Slaughter Hour: The Grand Debut! | Fin

[petapan]

Galron looks bad but my worry is that scum are bamboozling us and it's just a red herring

sabotage there is optimal regardless of the target's alignment (and it is INCREDIBLY annoying to think about) but irrelevant i'm looking purely in terms of day 1

[ulyana]

are we just hoping for the benefit mostly?

I think I'm going to vote spare because it seems to me Gamma is just town. Is that what you're questioning?

i,

why gamma just town?

like ? no consideration to sabotage then ope pooky dead inevitable felt hmm

[ulyana]

I don't really understand the language that the benefit occurs after the game. I'm not sure how that helps. Do we get cake and ice cream or something?

for next event i assumed when i read it

[Dwlee99]

Also, Akarin was killed in amogus for being active and TRed. Aside from me, Pooky was the most active player, and even aside from the fact I was the one in the seat, I wasn't really that widely TRed at the time that call was made. Aside from that no one came really within striking distance of my post count.

So you thought I may have killed Pooky because I read a game where someone was killed for what you think is a similar reason to why you think scum killed Pooky here? Moonlogic 100. I didn't read the scum chat, I didn't read the whole game, I skimmed some pages where they talked about their tasks and I looked at some of the role pms. You are vastly overestimating how much I read there

[Dwlee99]

Also I'm just glad gamma didn't murder me and I think scum him probably would kill me there cause it would have been an easy sell. "Dwlee LAMIST+dumbtell entrance die"

[Galron]

If I'm looking at it from a personal pov, the sabotage was done to set me up. That's the first thing I thought when I saw that pooky died instead of me. But we don't know what the saboteurs knew -- if they knew that when they pulled the trigger, pooky would die and I wouldn't. I think if Gamma were scum he would have said no to the sabotage if that were known. Unless this is some kind of big brain play. I guess since I'm limbait that could be the case. But Gamma chose to vote me, who is limbait, instead of anyone else. Would scum!gamma do that?

[Galron]

I don't really understand the language that the benefit occurs after the game. I'm not sure how that helps. Do we get cake and ice cream or something?

for next event i assumed when i read it

Mm yes. That makes more sense.

[Galron]

Really, scum in that situation would be better served to kill someone in the middle of the pack I would think.

[Gamma Emerald]

@ulyana

: I feel like the questioning you've been doing doesn't reflect so well in light of what the throne has been revealed to do. It feels like you've been trying to parse out feelings from people to determine who'd be a good choice for the chair. Can you explain your motives a bit?

@Saber

: I get how you thought my play was erratic in a way that felt tactical, but I can probably point to a few games where I've made sharp turns at critical moments as town. What I think I'm most interested in is your reads in general, because aside from your reads on me and Galron, those don't feel exactly clear rn. I've at least sussed out from your ISO that you TR Taly and ulyana.

@Dunnstral

: can you talk about why you've responded to certain things that you did and when you did so? I think that's the greatest bother for me about you currently.

@peta

: Let's take this from the top. I'm going to try to be more rational about being questioned. Do you still want answers to 359? Are there any other posts of yours you feel I've overlooked?

[SirCakez]

Ok I'm just gonna ignore the sabotage then because of huge WIFOM

[petapan]

no, gamma, i think the game has moved past me needing answers to something i asked 1400 posts ago that you already answered

[Galron]

When we get flips that may up the WIFOM.

[SirCakez]

Spare

whatever I'm fine with this

[SirCakez]

if Gamma is scum here he is playing a really good game

[Galron]

VOTE: spare

I would like to hear more of ulyana's thoughts on this.

[Gamma Emerald]

no, gamma, i think the game has moved past me needing answers to something i asked 1400 posts ago that you already answered

I don't recall ever answering the first half
you felt reactive by the virtue of your posts mostly being responses to others, and I felt like that was indicative of trying to ride the waves rather than wanting to make them. That might have just been playstyle, but either way I feel like later on you progressed past being reactive.

[Galron]

I think we're at -2.

[petapan]

no more votes until everyone has had a chance to post thanks

[ulyana]

@ulyana

: I feel like the questioning you've been doing doesn't reflect so well in light of what the throne has been revealed to do. It feels like you've been trying to parse out feelings from people to determine who'd be a good choice for the chair. Can you explain your motives a bit?

@Saber

: I get how you thought my play was erratic in a way that felt tactical, but I can probably point to a few games where I've made sharp turns at critical moments as town. What I think I'm most interested in is your reads in general, because aside from your reads on me and Galron, those don't feel exactly clear rn. I've at least sussed out from your ISO that you TR Taly and ulyana.

@Dunnstral

: can you talk about why you've responded to certain things that you did and when you did so? I think that's the greatest bother for me about you currently.

@peta

: Let's take this from the top. I'm going to try to be more rational about being questioned. Do you still want answers to 359? Are there any other posts of yours you feel I've overlooked?

?? my motives are to find the baddies talking about something the baddies possibly informed about a good way to possibly identify like ……

[Gamma Emerald]

Also, Akarin was killed in amogus for being active and TRed. Aside from me, Pooky was the most active player, and even aside from the fact I was the one in the seat, I wasn't really that widely TRed at the time that call was made. Aside from that no one came really within striking distance of my post count.

So you thought I may have killed Pooky because I read a game where someone was killed for what you think is a similar reason to why you think scum killed Pooky here? Moonlogic 100. I didn't read the scum chat, I didn't read the whole game, I skimmed some pages where they talked about their tasks and I looked at some of the role pms. You are vastly overestimating how much I read there

ngl I believe this
and agreed with peta, I'd like the ability to interface with the people I've called out towards

[Gamma Emerald]

@ulyana

: I feel like the questioning you've been doing doesn't reflect so well in light of what the throne has been revealed to do. It feels like you've been trying to parse out feelings from people to determine who'd be a good choice for the chair. Can you explain your motives a bit?

@Saber

: I get how you thought my play was erratic in a way that felt tactical, but I can probably point to a few games where I've made sharp turns at critical moments as town. What I think I'm most interested in is your reads in general, because aside from your reads on me and Galron, those don't feel exactly clear rn. I've at least sussed out from your ISO that you TR Taly and ulyana.

@Dunnstral

: can you talk about why you've responded to certain things that you did and when you did so? I think that's the greatest bother for me about you currently.

@peta

: Let's take this from the top. I'm going to try to be more rational about being questioned. Do you still want answers to 359? Are there any other posts of yours you feel I've overlooked?

?? my motives are to find the baddies talking about something the baddies possibly informed about a good way to possibly identify like ……

so your intent was to see who took something in a wrong direction that suggested extra knowledge? That feels reasonable if my reading is right

[petapan]

no, gamma, i think the game has moved past me needing answers to something i asked 1400 posts ago that you already answered

I don't recall ever answering the first half
you felt reactive by the virtue of your posts mostly being responses to others, and I felt like that was indicative of trying to ride the waves rather than wanting to make them. That might have just been playstyle, but either way I feel like later on you progressed past being reactive.

you did in 486

these feels reasonably consistent with each other though so that's good

[ulyana]

@ulyana

: I feel like the questioning you've been doing doesn't reflect so well in light of what the throne has been revealed to do. It feels like you've been trying to parse out feelings from people to determine who'd be a good choice for the chair. Can you explain your motives a bit?

@Saber

: I get how you thought my play was erratic in a way that felt tactical, but I can probably point to a few games where I've made sharp turns at critical moments as town. What I think I'm most interested in is your reads in general, because aside from your reads on me and Galron, those don't feel exactly clear rn. I've at least sussed out from your ISO that you TR Taly and ulyana.

@Dunnstral

: can you talk about why you've responded to certain things that you did and when you did so? I think that's the greatest bother for me about you currently.

@peta

: Let's take this from the top. I'm going to try to be more rational about being questioned. Do you still want answers to 359? Are there any other posts of yours you feel I've overlooked?

?? my motives are to find the baddies talking about something the baddies possibly informed about a good way to possibly identify like ……

so your intent was to see who took something in a wrong direction that suggested extra knowledge? That feels reasonable if my reading is right

where did you think my thoughts with regards to prism pooky taly came from ???

[ulyana]

@ulyana

: I feel like the questioning you've been doing doesn't reflect so well in light of what the throne has been revealed to do. It feels like you've been trying to parse out feelings from people to determine who'd be a good choice for the chair. Can you explain your motives a bit?

@Saber

: I get how you thought my play was erratic in a way that felt tactical, but I can probably point to a few games where I've made sharp turns at critical moments as town. What I think I'm most interested in is your reads in general, because aside from your reads on me and Galron, those don't feel exactly clear rn. I've at least sussed out from your ISO that you TR Taly and ulyana.

@Dunnstral

: can you talk about why you've responded to certain things that you did and when you did so? I think that's the greatest bother for me about you currently.

@peta

: Let's take this from the top. I'm going to try to be more rational about being questioned. Do you still want answers to 359? Are there any other posts of yours you feel I've overlooked?

?? my motives are to find the baddies talking about something the baddies possibly informed about a good way to possibly identify like ……

so your intent was to see who took something in a wrong direction that suggested extra knowledge? That feels reasonable if my reading is right

where did you think my thoughts with regards to prism pooky taly came from ???

early game i mean

[ulyana]

like can you explain what you were doing kinda absurd here