Mafiascum.net

In post 1773, Bell wrote:It’s haphazard and the placement of two PoE lists is confusing for no discernible reason.

haphazard? i think most scum are in the top group but there might be one in the lower group. idk what's confusing about that

No. We should kill fire, because if they’re scum there’s plenty of associations to go through as well. Everybody has asked about fire.
Also, I don’t really know what you’re talking about in how what you wrote makes a lot of sense to you. At minimum two players get killed if fire is scum.

And sure, they could talk themselves out of their elimination. But that’s true for any reasonably active player that tries not to get killed.

In post 1774, fireisredsir wrote:andres posts that he's catching up: 1491
frog starts pressuring him: 1507

frog's entire premise is wrong

this will be the only engagement i have with this subject

Hey look the outted scum is actively discouraging us from improving our ability to sort andres.

In post 1776, Bell wrote: At minimum two players get killed if fire is scum.

?

frog has still given a total of 0 reasons why he thinks im scum

In post 1778, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1776, Bell wrote: At minimum two players get killed if fire is scum.

?

Did someone claim masons with fire?

In post 1778, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1776, Bell wrote: At minimum two players get killed if fire is scum.

?

I’m phone posting and there is some wild autocorrecting going on.
Meant cleared there.

@fire, um. You should probably look at your own post again and think about why someone would think it’s strange given the information you provided.

In post 1722, fireisredsir wrote:as long as the theatre involves ignoring frog and not engaging with him anymore bc he is trying to hero solve day 1 and it is clearly warping his perspective and making him useless

this post is bad

VOTE: fire

In post 1781, Bell wrote:@fire, um. You should probably look at your own post again and think about why someone would think it’s strange given the information you provided.

uhh you're gonna have to spell it out for me. i don't know why someone would think it was strange

In post 1784, Andante wrote:VOTE: Mistyx

hello

In post 1781, Bell wrote:I’m phone posting and there is some wild autocorrecting going on.
Meant cleared there.

Cleared as in a couple widely townread players are moderately more likely to be town? And this rules out andres wagon as being strong for town?

wrt andres i feel like posts like 1543, 1559, and 1594 come off as more theory than solving in a way i think is scum indicative

his last two posts are pretty towny though

so i'd rather he follow up on his posts and go from there

I think Bell is scum defending andres. And I'm not opposed to Mist vote I'll hammer fire if they get to e-1.

dont hammer i literally just got here

In post 1787, Mistyx wrote:wrt andres i feel like posts like 1543, 1559, and 1594 come off as more theory than solving in a way i think is scum indicative

his last two posts are pretty towny though

so i'd rather he follow up on his posts and go from there

why is it towny when andres shades frog and doesn't want to interact with him but it's scummy when i do it

is it cause im the leading wagon opposite yours

bell's posts have good vibes

In post 1767, fireisredsir wrote:so 3 scum most likely in:
[tweet, menalque]

Why are these 7 players separated by 3 lines?

[dwlee, strange]

Why is Dwlee in the middle of this list when you think Dwlee is scum and seem to have indicated you were pretty strongly scum them?

[andres, mala, enchant]

Why is Andres grouped with Mala and Enchant, one of these is not like the others.

and then like maybe 1 of:
[csf, bell]

Once again why are there 4 players 2 separate lines. Why are there two separate PoE lists

[vp, andante]

an 11 person poe woohooo that's so useful

I hope this helps explain my confusion.

@Frogster,

In post 1790, fireisredsir wrote:

In post 1787, Mistyx wrote:wrt andres i feel like posts like 1543, 1559, and 1594 come off as more theory than solving in a way i think is scum indicative

his last two posts are pretty towny though

so i'd rather he follow up on his posts and go from there

why is it towny when andres shades frog and doesn't want to interact with him but it's scummy when i do it

is it cause im the leading wagon opposite yours

cuz andres was being forward about it instead of indirect

In post 1791, Mistyx wrote:bell's posts have good vibes

Nah Bell's scum

In post 1794, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1791, Mistyx wrote:bell's posts have good vibes

Nah Bell's scum

nah bell town

Mist if you're catching up now can you give an opinion on Ceph's slot? I made a post about Ceph too this afternoon

@bell

- they're loosely grouped by how likely i think they're scum. scummiest at the top. the two separate poe chunks are a wider gap in likelihood. i feel like this should be pretty obvious???

- dwlee isn't in the top group cause my gutread isn't as strong as it is for the top two. their positioning looks pretty scummy tho so they get in the 2nd group.

- andres mala and enchant are all in the "they were pretty absent for a while or still are and haven't really done anything towny but also i don't specifically scumread their play" group. which one isn't like the others? they are in the same mental bucket for me

In post 1796, Frogsterking wrote:Mist if you're catching up now can you give an opinion on Ceph's slot? I made a post about Ceph too this afternoon

ceph is town

i remember now that some people do their readlists with scummiest at the bottom. is that why you were confused?