Mafiascum.net

Not a reaction to you actually
Maybe get over yourself?

In post 1774, Legends wrote:

In post 1772, Gamma Emerald wrote:

Unironically, scum!Gamma also reacted this way to me in a

different

game over a year ago which I'm assuming they don't remember.

Bleghfgf

Sorry, account slipped

hey GuiltyLion, im starting to be sus of you.
Why it feel like ur trying to hide behind dats this game?

I don't like where ur going 90% of the time this game.

In post 1752, Ydrasse wrote:i love being unreadable and inscrutable

We have one thing in common

In post 1775, Gamma Emerald wrote:Not a reaction to you actually
Maybe get over yourself?

You were rolling your eyes at...the votecount?

In post 1731, obscure wrote:lean mafia: ydresse, firebringer, deasvail

Okay ngl. This would be a pretty fun team

Firebringer is here to bail out Gamma or is just oblivious?

In post 1714, ConManMick wrote:

In post 1624, GuiltyLion wrote:although CMM I do want to know who those other people are still

OK I read back some and ISOd some folks
I think there's scum in:
Ari, marci, the eira slot, frog, firered
I need to read marci's iso because it was all incidental stuff from reading other folks'.
I think your push on FB is wrong but useful and I like your play.
My Datisi read I think is wrong for now and I'm gonna move my vote. Later stuff certainly appears to be working toward a solve. Page 28 interactions with FB aside but I thing ye all talked about that enough.
I thought also maybe skip and scamp had scum between them but then actually skitter's iso looked pretty good and I haven't looked at scamp properly yet.
HEMs early stuff I thought town and also VP but a few things struck me as off from both and I would like to look back properly at both.
I don't particularly think FB is town but I can wait for him to kick into gear for now and he's done enough that I am not auto scumreading so I don't want to vote there right now.
I am interested in seeing more of Xof's iso dives to see what kind of content is there
I will look at some stuff in the morning. I'm trying to just chuck down rough notes so I don't have to start fresh so I appreciate this is a bit halfhazard.

RN I like Datisi, Nero, and GL.

VOTE: Ari

I disagree heavily with this. I neither think his push on me was useful and I don't think he should believe it was. And I am not getting why you saw it useful.

Actually more i think about that post the more i don't like it. You better not be scum conman.

pedit frogster hey buddy how u doing. I don't care about gamma. But ur welcome to continue talking about them as much as you want. I am here to play, and if you poke me again I will poke harder back.

In post 1781, Frogsterking wrote:Firebringer is here to bail out Gamma or is just oblivious?

I am going to word this nicely.
But was this post made with the intention of trying to annoy me or just made without thinking?
I don't know.

I am going to calm down now because this post shouldn't have bugged me as much as it should and you probably didn't intend it to.

don't both answering last post. I have taken what the kids might call a chill pill.

In post 1779, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1775, Gamma Emerald wrote:Not a reaction to you actually
Maybe get over yourself?

You were rolling your eyes at...the votecount?

Yes
More specifically, it proving Nero’s poorly-constructed bluff as just that

In post 1784, Firebringer wrote:don't both answering last post. I have taken what the kids might call a chill pill.

Adderall

some quick bits on the new stuff:

- i think frogsterking is probably town
- im less decided on dannflor, he felt rather reactive tho ig thats to be expected when replacing into a slot and getting called scum right off the bat
- apart from the thing on dats, i didnt like conmanmicks 1714 bc it felt like he was just throwing out things to give the appearance of having opinions but with no visible reasoning its hard for me to believe a sub has that developed a view of the game, and it was all nonspecific
- i dont have any thoughts on obscure at this moment in time
- im still not seeing scum!gamma

In post 1787, scamper wrote:im still not seeing scum!gamma

What do you see when you read Gamma's iso and what do you think motivates Gamma in this game?

In post 1788, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1787, scamper wrote:im still not seeing scum!gamma

What do you see when you read Gamma's iso and what do you think motivates Gamma in this game?

i think shes hanging back and commenting/giving input on things that catch her attention. her analysis is brief but i can feel shes thinking abt things. shes not trying to take a big role or influence things too strongly and has been unbothered by pressure or the suggestion shes not doing enough.


i felt like she played fairly similarly in 2276 where i was scum and she was town. i dont think her playing in the background this game is scum-ai. even looking at the scum game from last year u mentioned, i would describe her play there as "performative" and i dont get the same feeling from her this game, at all.

Fire(s) and scamper Town leaned

Can't sleep so here have some word vomit
Marci- posts seem to just be cutesy one liners alluding to solving the game but not really demonstrating any intent to contribute.
Frog - posts read as that faux aggressive solver but arguments are just grasping at whatever in reach. Cagey reads - presumably because they are very rough and vague? - yet also acknowledging that I am using the thread "as a notebook" and being critical of that. I don't think these ideas align. Interested in Gamma and I because it's convenient.
Gamma- thought the questions were an effort to sort me and no offence given or taken, more was trying to see how you were thinking around sorting. Not very clear on this wagon (firered, irrelephant, Nero, frog) but not currently wanting to vote here myself. Haven't looked at the people voting here in depth. Liked Nero's start though, and the few posts I've read between.
Ari - similar to marci but more in-depth at least, lots of fluff about "I'm not nice" but nothing I really consider very town. Trying to push some narrative of sorting by highlighting rvs shitposts as sorting, doubt. Very weak claim.
Scamper - datisi-> largely agreed with HEMs 286 and 292, and Ausukas 288 and 290.
Later posts and a re-read makes me think I was wrong to jump just for these.
pls answer my question about irrelephant read. I also don't buy this "developed view" comment, I don't think anything I have presented is developed. This is a big game and I am trying to compartmentalise with some loose strokes to start, I don't think this is a justified comment but I want to be sure this isn't just more semantic conflict.
FB #1782 "useful" in that it drew out your contribution beyond the early "lolol I rolled scum" and got you engaged. I think then it tunnelled at needless length thus why I said I think it's wrong move, but that doesn't mean it wasn't worth the end result. You had some solid posts resulting from that, which made me feel good about your slot.

In post 1789, scamper wrote:

In post 1788, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1787, scamper wrote:im still not seeing scum!gamma

What do you see when you read Gamma's iso and what do you think motivates Gamma in this game?

i think shes hanging back and commenting/giving input on things that catch her attention. her analysis is brief but i can feel shes thinking abt things. shes not trying to take a big role or influence things too strongly and has been unbothered by pressure or the suggestion shes not doing enough.


i felt like she played fairly similarly in 2276 where i was scum and she was town. i dont think her playing in the background this game is scum-ai. even looking at the scum game from last year u mentioned, i would describe her play there as "performative" and i dont get the same feeling from her this game, at all.

Fair enough, do you have any thoughts on xo?

UNVOTE: Gamma

In post 1785, Gamma Emerald wrote:More specifically, it proving Nero’s poorly-constructed bluff as just that

this made me laugh HARD!

like it's so cringe that you are so proud of yourself that you thwarted my heinous plan to get you to claim b4 you are at L-1

*evil cackle*

In post 1793, ConManMick wrote:Can't sleep so here have some word vomit
Marci- posts seem to just be cutesy one liners alluding to solving the game but not really demonstrating any intent to contribute.
Frog - posts read as that faux aggressive solver but arguments are just grasping at whatever in reach. Cagey reads - presumably because they are very rough and vague? - yet also acknowledging that I am using the thread "as a notebook" and being critical of that. I don't think these ideas align. Interested in Gamma and I because it's convenient.

though on a more serious note I would like start consolidating or something b/c it's already 70 pages although I guess I wouldn't be surprised if we hit another 70. At least the deadline isn't frozen.

In post 1797, Nero Cain wrote:though on a more serious note I would like start consolidating or something b/c it's already 70 pages although I guess I wouldn't be surprised if we hit another 70. At least the deadline isn't frozen.

You mentioned Dease, VP, who all are you looking at?

for the amount of shit ive gotten recently im surprised there hasnt been a real wagon on me