Mafiascum.net

In post 1771, Trojan Horses wrote:

In post 1768, mastina wrote:One of your heads explicitly said they'd be willing to fake Nancy posting?

Please quote! I didn't say that, and I highly doubt the other head did.

In post 1437, Trojan Horses wrote:To NSG: I was referring to Nancy in this post.
She's unable to get herself to post right now due to a few reasons.

If she was able to, I'd absolutely be making her post if we were scum.

What does the bolded mean if not "I'd be making her posts if we were scum"?

aw, i kind of liked bernadetta.

In post 1735, RadiantCowbells wrote:i decided it would be remiss not to quote this

i think that thor thought (still thinks?) you're a girl as well

In post 1763, mastina wrote:northsidegal's lackluster content shows that she's not invested in this game

for no reason other than what can only be said to be her alignment

.

i'm interested to hear this. i won't deny that i'm not particularly invested in this game, but i would say the lustre of my content is about as equal as is warranted by the content of the game. so what is it that makes it that i be scum because of not being invested? that is, why is being scum the only possible result of not being particularly invested? i could easily cite you towngames where i lacked investment much more than here, but i think we both know that.

In post 1780, Trojan Horses wrote:

In post 1775, RadiantCowbells wrote:bitmap you mastina vecna

Haven't I and Mastina been pushing her much earlier?

I've been pushing her for the whole fucking game nonstop yes.

i am not talking to anyone in that group of 4 any further btw

i know one of them is town in my game but i dont really care

firebringer and mastina are both confirmed scum both associatively and based on individual play: i am going to place my vote now

VOTE: nothelping

In post 1800, mastina wrote:What does the bolded mean if not "I'd be making her posts if we were scum"?

Ohh, that way - sorry, I misinterpreted.
I said I'd make her post, not make her posts As in get her to post.

In post 1794, RadiantCowbells wrote:mastina is confirmed scum in the other game

.

In post 1802, mastina wrote:

In post 1780, Trojan Horses wrote:

In post 1775, RadiantCowbells wrote:bitmap you mastina vecna

Haven't I and Mastina been pushing her much earlier?

I've been pushing her for the whole fucking game nonstop yes.

actually

you were pretty content to lurk your ass off back when town wasnt really doing anything

it wasnt until i started explicitly accusing you that you redoubled your pushes on me and nsg

you call people outed scum for saying theyll be back later when bernadetta (who is in fact gif btw) clearly said they had RL stuff going on that was delaying their catching up

you used the same rationale to push amrun

rl stuff is not alignment indicative and you dont believe that it is

you also arent stupid or arrogant enough to push the readslist that you are, you are 100% aware of how quickly town 100% loses a game if you are wrong on a player that is essentially impossible to read because I am 100% not wrong on NSG

RC, you're willing to take BoP on a Mastina lynch?

In post 1798, RadiantCowbells wrote:

In post 1784, We are not helping wrote:

In post 1775, RadiantCowbells wrote:bitmap you mastina vecna

Then maybe NSG shouldn't literally dip for 2 days, ignore this game, and post excessively in other games she's in. Especially when a bunch of players in this game played in Team Mafia.

-bitmap

??????

the time period that she wasnt posting in this game she didnt post anywhere else either

https://forum.mafiascum.net/search.php? ... 8&sr=posts

if you mean early game? its not exactly out of character for her not to post much in the early phases of any game.

I mean when she did her whole into + the fuck bbmolla thing and then dipped for 2 days while posting in other games.

I literally played Team Mafia with you guys and you think it's weird that I think "hey, maybe something could be off but I'm not entirely sure yet"?

-bitmap

if thats what it takes to kill mastina sure lets do it

Game's finally getting fun! ^_^

In post 1803, RadiantCowbells wrote:firebringer and mastina are both confirmed scum both associatively and based on individual play:

what a plot twist.

I cant wait for the rest of the season

~fire

In post 1736, Trojan Horses wrote:

In post 1732, SirCakez wrote:I feel you're just using this interaction to attempt to make me look bad though

Isn't that a good sign?

Define good sign

In post 1740, mastina wrote:

In post 1644, SirCakez wrote:Mastina were you scum?

No. I'm town.

Mastina this stupid rolecard stuff you're pulling should make it obvious why other people are SRing you.

In post 1805, mastina wrote:

In post 1794, RadiantCowbells wrote:mastina is confirmed scum in the other game

HOLD RC TO THIS AND POWERFUCKING LYNCH HIM WHEN I FLIP TOWN

.

Why? This is just RC's personality.
Mastina you're completely derailed here

In post 1770, RadiantCowbells wrote:firebringer hydra isnt stupid enough to push on nsg without my consent when they have me as town and her content really does not justify pushing on her.

its like u don't even know me.

~fire

In post 1801, northsidegal wrote:i'm interested to hear this. i won't deny that i'm not particularly invested in this game, but i would say the lustre of my content is about as equal as is warranted by the content of the game. so what is it that makes it that i

must

be scum because of not being invested? that is, why is being scum the only possible result of not being particularly invested? i could easily cite you towngames where i lacked investment much more than here, but i think we both know that.

There's no good reason to not be invested in this game.
While the game did stall due to many slots being in need of replacement, nothing--literally nothing--warranted this game being one which wasn't worth investing in. Quite the opposite, there's a metric fuckload of shit which makes this game heavily worthy of getting invested in. It's interesting, it's engaging, it's got a ton of good players, it had a good environment where people were being lighthearted, and yet serious enough to have reasonably strong scumhunting.

This game had an energy about it that made it worth playing--and while that energy right now has faded greatly in many ways, it has never truly disappeared altogether. Plus, you have shown a track record; you've been, provably, disengaged and disinterested in being scum, whereas you've shown, proven, you have a track record of being engaged and interested as town, and sitewide have shown that you're active elsewhere far, far more than here.

A lack of interest, right now, in this game, unwarranted, randomly, compared to sitewide having plenty of interest.

It's enough.

firebringer too stupid that he wouldn't do X.

should only be said sarcastingly.

come on folks, this is fire 101



~fire

Mastina why are you only showing up now that there's real lynch pressure on you? You've been sorta absent from the game for a while.

Like nsg has been disengaged for ages
Why only pull this out now?

I'm going to stop posting tonight because you know it's time to stop playing mafia when you agree with mastina.

-bitmap

In post 1816, SirCakez wrote:Mastina why are you only showing up now that there's real lynch pressure on you? You've been sorta absent from the game for a while.

Before I sleep, this is good post.

-bitmap

In post 1744, mastina wrote:

In post 1648, Vecna wrote:Really odd that people just now speedhammered Mastina with so many replacements coming in.

Yes well they're fucking morons, so.

I wish I could say 'fucking scum', but like.
Wonderwall's the only scum on my wagon since nsg is off and the only other possible scum slot is Amrun's who isn't voting me so like.

It's not scum.

So it's fucking morons.

at least now ur actually trying to imitate ur town game.
kind of late for that, don't u think?

~fire

In post 1803, RadiantCowbells wrote:firebringer and mastina are both confirmed scum both associatively and based on individual play: i am going to place my vote now

Ah yes.
Firebringer the one in his hydra insisting that this is scumastina is my scumbuddy.

Clearly a valid narrative.





...

Yeah, this is bullshit and RC KNOWS it is bullshit because he fucking knows Firebringer and me to the extent that he fucking knows that we're not scumbuddies.

The narrative that we're both scum is one which is inherently, purely, manipulative.
Meant to manipulate players into selling a narrative, with no thought as to whether that narrative holds up.

In post 1814, mastina wrote:A lack of interest, right now, in this game, unwarranted, randomly, compared to sitewide having plenty of interest.

It's enough.

you keep stating this but its blatantly untrue given her posting history which is public information.

firebringer also claimed the same thing.

Generally mastinas posts last two pages have been really bad
Especially the role card thing
I know she's smarter than that
And just buckets of AtE
I am no longer opposed to this lynch

In post 1778, Shuichi Saihara wrote:This feels like it's on the road to toxicity.

Please stop claiming for no reason.

so can I no longer clim scum?

~fire