Posted: Thu May 28, 2020 2:55 pm
Battle Tested... That's what we call it now?
At this point, Gibus has joined FormerFish in voting for Brass herald (Wavesarc), and FormerFish decides to hop off the wagon onto Freddie:
Since then, three more people have joined Gibus in voting for Wavesarc, and FormerFish decides to return to the wagon and hammer:In post 932, Formerfish wrote:VOTE: Freddie
We aren't lynching Tux today unless someone builds a fucking scotus level brief against them and destroys the view I have of that slot on review.
Copy was bleeding town.
And ending back on Brassherald again, here:
He then reiterates his Brassherald (Wavesarc) vote here (this was not a vote movement, his vote was already on him):
Much later, after FormerFish has started the wagon that will eventually mislynch Wavesarc, Gibus rejoins as the second vote on the wagon:In post 166, gibus wrote:VOTE: brassheraldIn post 153, gibus wrote:Quicksolve: brass, lilith, formerfish
In post 768, gibus wrote:Do not scumread me for this please, but I'm going to sheep Fish and Nauci and change my vote in 3 posts.
VOTE: brassherald (wavesarc)
I agree. Sorry for missing that part, Blair.In post 1747, Nauci wrote:But we (I, but I believe Osuka agreed) settled on votato being definitely town regardless of Freddie's alignment because it would be insane of him to throw away his generally town read status to quintuple down on defending Freddie for any reason other than genuinely town reading her because of IRL meta knowledgeIn post 1721, gibus wrote:Wavesarc, Fred and CopyKat were the main wagons of D1.In post 1716, Blair wrote:Greetings!
I was promised panadas.
88% of living players in this game are replacements. This presents a unique challenge! I'll review the thread over the next 24 hours.
Gibus, as the sole remainder of the original playlist, can I trouble you for a tl;dr?
Votato was scumread by lilith and waves for not pushing his scumreads.
Fred claimed even though someone else got hammered. FF, osuka, lilith speculated that this was scummy. Votato was very confident that it came from a town mindset, which made others think that votato could flip scum if Fred flipped town/Fred could flip scum if votato flipped scum.
Did you exclude this from your summary because you disagree... Or?
He is a new enough player that he has no completed games yet. Arguments based on, "We all know this would be an unforced error as scum," don't apply very well to new players.In post 1803, Nauci wrote:Do you think that scum!Gibus would really make post 768? IDK if it's a newbie game thing, but half of the players in this game have made wildly LAMIST posts that I can barely fathom to the point I no longer know what to make of the whole genre
I don't. I suggested you were fixated on Brassherald because you voted for him over and over again throughout the phase - reducing my analysis to a single RVS vote as you have done here seems disingenuous, yes?In post 1804, gibus wrote:Why do you think town is less likely to RVS vote an eventual D1 lynch?
Say more about this. The implication here is that you believe it should ("affect [my] theory") - explain what parts of your interaction should affect my theory and why.In post 1805, gibus wrote:Also what do you think of my interaction with Fish? Does it affect your theory?
You said, "sus out the players who seemed to mysteriously "forsee" the Day 1 mislynch" and pointed to my RVS vote as scumtell, which implies that scum is likelier (than town) to RVS vote an eventual D1 lynch. Or am I misinterpreting this?In post 1807, Blair wrote:I don't. I suggested you were fixated on Brassherald because you voted for him over and over again throughout the phase - reducing my analysis to a single RVS vote as you have done here seems disingenuous, yes?In post 1804, gibus wrote:Why do you think town is less likely to RVS vote an eventual D1 lynch?
I was the only player here who scumread Fish (apart from votato, who never made his case clear), when he was being strongly townread by others.Say more about this. The implication here is that you believe it should ("affect [my] theory") - explain what parts of your interaction should affect my theory and why.In post 1805, gibus wrote:Also what do you think of my interaction with Fish? Does it affect your theory?
You're misunderstanding. I said I "usually" look for that - but if you read the rest of that statement, I said, "something else," had caught my attention. i.e. This is outside of that formula.In post 1809, gibus wrote:You said, "sus out the players who seemed to mysteriously "forsee" the Day 1 mislynch" and pointed to my RVS vote as scumtell, which implies that scum is likelier (than town) to RVS vote an eventual D1 lynch. Or am I misinterpreting this?
Yeah, a lot more, but it all boils down to, "There were some very strange circumstances surrounding Wavesarc's mislynch wagon and FormerFish happens to be the main driver of those dynamics," which I won't reiterate here because I outlined them in the post you're referencing.In post 1810, gibus wrote:Also I don't seen any case on FF other than "he hammered waves without much reason". Do you have anything more?
Why Nauci?In post 1811, Battle Mage wrote:just checking in to say you're all doing well - Nauci is the lynch today. Gibus is giving me some little townpings.
I don't 'get' this. Why is it likely for Gibus to have wanted to mislynch Wavesarc from the start, vs that being a real read that formed?In post 1802, Blair wrote:Gibus
Gibus casts what is ostensibly an RVS vote for Brassherald (Wavesarc) as the first in a series of 9 rapid-fire votes over the course of his next 13 consecutive posts, beginning here:And ending back on Brassherald again, here:He then reiterates his Brassherald (Wavesarc) vote here (this was not a vote movement, his vote was already on him):Much later, after FormerFish has started the wagon that will eventually mislynch Wavesarc, Gibus rejoins as the second vote on the wagon:In post 166, gibus wrote:VOTE: brassheraldIn post 153, gibus wrote:Quicksolve: brass, lilith, formerfishIn post 768, gibus wrote:Do not scumread me for this please, but I'm going to sheep Fish and Nauci and change my vote in 3 posts.
VOTE: brassherald (wavesarc)
Now we editorialize:
It seemsextremelyarrogant of me to suggest a solve so early in the game, but here's what may have happened:
Gibus made up his mind from early in the game that he was gunning for Brassherald (Wavesarc). I won't pretend to read his mind and guess why, but the fact that he was is more than evident.
FormerFish started a wagon on Brassherald (Wavesarc) and Gibus jumped on board. As it became more evident that Wavesarc was not going to get any townier and he became a more and more viable lynch, FormerFish blinked first. The fact that he jumped back in to hammer without much rhyme or reason suggests that FormerFish didn't mind lynching Wavesarc, he just didn't like seeing his name right next to Gibus in the vote count.
Theory:
FormerFish/Gibus Scum team?
VOTE: Gibus
I'll start here because Gibus is still here to talk to us about the above. We'll have more to talk to FormerFish's replacement about after he reacts to his partner's tragic lynching today.
Hark! Let us commence our steadfast march toward a glorious town victory!
I don't really work that way (I don't typically have hard reads on anyone, rather I develop "If/Then" reads based on how likely I consider certain interpretations of particular events), but I will attempt to satisfy your request. If I had to represent my current impression of the gamestate as a formal read list, it would be:Tuxedo Mask wrote:If everyone is caught up, could I get a read list from the replacements? Sorry, everything is a bit up in the air at the moment. So I'd appreciate being able to pin down where people stand specifically, and not just how they feel about certain major moments.
That part was an observation, not an opinion. You should ask Gibus why he was tunneling Brassherald/Wavesarc the entire phase, instead of asking me why he was likely to do so - unless I am misunderstanding the question?Dunnstral wrote:I don't 'get' this. Why is it likely for Gibus to have wanted to mislynch Wavesarc from the start, vs that being a real read that formed?
It was - but the part you asked me to clarify was a factual observation, not an interpretation.Dunnstral wrote:I thought it was a case
This appears to be lean-scum? I don't actually see a null section.
In the post you initially responded to, I outlined Gibus' vote movements as they related to Brassherald on Day 1, and it seemed apparent to me that Gibus' vote returned to Brassherald again and again, more than any other player. If you disagree, say so and provide evidence, instead of asking vague questions without acknowledging the posts and vote history I have already provided in the post you quoted.In post 1822, Dunnstral wrote:I don't get how it is a factual observation - has Gibus admitted to it?
You're saying that he wanted to lynch Wave from the start of the game - it looks like they disagreed with you above.