Page 73 of 142

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 4:15 pm
by Andante
In post 1798, RH9 wrote:It is in my opinion, that voting numberQ will not cause much help to the game unless he is put near a potential elimination. I remember that it is usually when he is in danger of being hammered, that he responds to the push. At least in my experience from Open 835.
I mean, we have nothing from half the table, I'm down to sheep whoever/vote wherever (with the exception of voting a few) like, we have 4 total lines from Voyc and nothing good from datsi so I sr that slot for sure, N_M gave us nothing, and looking at the playerlist I couldn't tell you a thing some of the others have done

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 4:16 pm
by Andante
actually, I'm voting Voyc until I have a reason to unvote there
VOTE: Voyc

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 4:20 pm
by Alyssa The Lamb
that's always a great read to see from a game with >70 pages

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 4:24 pm
by RH9
Voyc does seem quite behind and be sheeping popular wagons for not much reason. I don't know if it's because she's actually too busy to read the game or if there's another reason. I have to admit that 4 posts is unusually less.

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 4:26 pm
by Alyssa The Lamb
never fear, I have a great solution to this

give me a minute

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 4:30 pm
by Alyssa The Lamb
VOTE: Enchant

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:00 pm
by MegAzumarill
In post 1778, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:Three and Andante are standing out to me in particular just off this information alone

MegAzumarill's vote on marcistar appears particularly awkward

The RH9 wagon today looks a bit odd with the player compositions pushing it

Enchant's vote somehow got moved twice when they only voted one in their ISO, very odd
I want some elaboration on this post.
(All 4 parts :P)

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:01 pm
by Three
In post 1799, RH9 wrote:
In post 1793, Three wrote:
In post 1790, RH9 wrote:
In post 1777, Harley Quinn wrote:
In post 1770, Three wrote:
@RH9:
Why aren't you voting Q?
+1

Yes, I guess that’s concerning me too. He says Q’s playing differently here but he’s not voting him or anyone, so it makes me wonder.
Because I don't go around voting people for acting 'different'.
In post 1791, RH9 wrote:numberQdifferent ≠ scum
Then why did you bring it up?
I brought it up so that HQ could notice the flaws in her logic that acting different to a previous towngame is a valid reason to vote somebody off.
That wasn't the impression I got at all, it looked like you were trying to scum case Q. But ok.

Who do you think is scum and who should be a priority vote?

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:04 pm
by Alyssa The Lamb
In post 1806, MegAzumarill wrote:
In post 1778, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:Three and Andante are standing out to me in particular just off this information alone

MegAzumarill's vote on marcistar appears particularly awkward

The RH9 wagon today looks a bit odd with the player compositions pushing it

Enchant's vote somehow got moved twice when they only voted one in their ISO, very odd
I want some elaboration on this post.
(All 4 parts :P)
1 was already explained

2 is because of your explanation, it looks really awkwardly placed there

3 was already explained

4 is a joke

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:08 pm
by MegAzumarill
I suppose for 1 I should rephrase how they are standing out to you rather than why.

For point 2 I don't really get what you mean. Marci responded to pressure with what looked like intentional jester tells which is very scummy imo.

For point three what information to you take away from the day start push and leaving.

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:09 pm
by MegAzumarill
Because my phrasing as always was inadequate before

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:10 pm
by Alyssa The Lamb
you're overestimating what I'm actually getting from these

that's more an icebreaker to get into the game at all than anything else

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:11 pm
by Alyssa The Lamb
I'd really just say that if there's dead weight slots, just say fuck it and get them out of the game

I'd frankly rather have to deal with killing all three scum over having to worry about which of the four or five slots doing nothing is the deadweight scum

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:12 pm
by MegAzumarill
Do you have a reason for suspecting Enchant over other lurkers or are you just going after some of the players that shy away from the limelight?

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:14 pm
by Alyssa The Lamb
lowest volume posting slot

I'm skipping Voyc since that slot at least has content whenever it posts

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:16 pm
by Dwlee99
I'm still wondering who voyc is

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:17 pm
by MegAzumarill
In post 1812, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:I'd really just say that if there's dead weight slots, just say fuck it and get them out of the game

I'd frankly rather have to deal with killing all three scum over having to worry about which of the four or five slots doing nothing is the deadweight scum
The problem with this is I find it unlikely all of the scum are hiding in the shadows.
I doubt scum would try to let town solve unimpeded and we win if we manage to get only two goons so I think considering the relatively few active players we have greater odds of hitting scum.

Not to mention it's easier to sort those slots so finding scum shouldn't be too bad if my assumption is correct.

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:19 pm
by Firebringer
hey alyssa the nerd joined the game. nice

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:25 pm
by Alyssa The Lamb
In post 1816, MegAzumarill wrote:
In post 1812, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:I'd really just say that if there's dead weight slots, just say fuck it and get them out of the game

I'd frankly rather have to deal with killing all three scum over having to worry about which of the four or five slots doing nothing is the deadweight scum
The problem with this is I find it unlikely all of the scum are hiding in the shadows.
I doubt scum would try to let town solve unimpeded and we win if we manage to get only two goons so I think considering the relatively few active players we have greater odds of hitting scum.

Not to mention it's easier to sort those slots so finding scum shouldn't be too bad if my assumption is correct.
okay

so why kick the can down the road

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:43 pm
by MegAzumarill
In post 1818, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:
In post 1816, MegAzumarill wrote:
In post 1812, Alyssa The Lamb wrote:I'd really just say that if there's dead weight slots, just say fuck it and get them out of the game

I'd frankly rather have to deal with killing all three scum over having to worry about which of the four or five slots doing nothing is the deadweight scum
The problem with this is I find it unlikely all of the scum are hiding in the shadows.
I doubt scum would try to let town solve unimpeded and we win if we manage to get only two goons so I think considering the relatively few active players we have greater odds of hitting scum.

Not to mention it's easier to sort those slots so finding scum shouldn't be too bad if my assumption is correct.
okay

so why kick the can down the road
Partially wanted to see how people (like you) would catch up before giving my own reasons.

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:44 pm
by Firebringer
i think megazumarill is town.
And RH9 why dont we push numberq towards elim here if that will get the best read

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:44 pm
by Firebringer
In post 1816, MegAzumarill wrote:The problem with this is I find it unlikely all of the scum are hiding in the shadows.
how many times u played scum before

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:46 pm
by MegAzumarill
In post 1821, Firebringer wrote:
In post 1816, MegAzumarill wrote:The problem with this is I find it unlikely all of the scum are hiding in the shadows.
how many times u played scum before
A handful on site, nothing else that would have anything close to the deadlines of forum mafia though.

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:47 pm
by Firebringer
okay well all the scum hidingi n shadows doing nothing is nothing unheard of, and when 90% of this game is basically doing that, it just increases odds of that being case.

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:49 pm
by MegAzumarill
In post 1823, Firebringer wrote:okay well all the scum hidingi n shadows doing nothing is nothing unheard of, and when 90% of this game is basically doing that, it just increases odds of that being case.
I don't doubt there is some scum that's lurking, I just don't think that ALL of the scum is lurking.