Mafiascum.net

In post 1792, Faker wrote:

Spoiler: When skitter doesn't spend an hour on New Year's Day tracking through my disparate phone posts on Cakez

In post 1798, midwaybear wrote:It feels weird because most people in this game have received pressure. I think all townies go through suspicion at one point or another, so you sort of remaining on the fringes of that is weird. That part was sort of a gut thing so idk if I explain it too well.
Some takes were: Datisi early game was "cool", SA beetlejuicing was scummy. I know it is only two though...
I gave my reads yesterday. I think my most spicy read atm is that you are scum. Also, I read 1705
I don't read your quoted portion of SA's bigpost as backwards justification. Although I do agree that the reasons given weren't that scum-indicative (for IV), I think it is a reasonable belief to have as town. Ok, the stuff on IV later isn't too great either. I don't really understand why you called him out for his nsg section either.
It just seems to me that you can't really read SA based on his takes because he is perpetually behind. So I would read him based off his real-time interactions and, again, I don't think scum is that open about "beetlejuicing" which makes him a town lean for me.

In post 1801, innocentvillager wrote:VOTE: skitter

In post 1766, Mare wrote:My eyes were open to the crimes.

~

There've been things that Midway's said that I looked and thought, yeah, I've said/thought something like this before as town. What's the bad parts about him?

In post 1806, skitter30 wrote:

In post 1798, midwaybear wrote:It feels weird because most people in this game have received pressure. I think all townies go through suspicion at one point or another, so you sort of remaining on the fringes of that is weird. That part was sort of a gut thing so idk if I explain it too well.
Some takes were: Datisi early game was "cool", SA beetlejuicing was scummy. I know it is only two though...
I gave my reads yesterday. I think my most spicy read atm is that you are scum. Also, I read 1705
I don't read your quoted portion of SA's bigpost as backwards justification. Although I do agree that the reasons given weren't that scum-indicative (for IV), I think it is a reasonable belief to have as town. Ok, the stuff on IV later isn't too great either. I don't really understand why you called him out for his nsg section either.
It just seems to me that you can't really read SA based on his takes because he is perpetually behind. So I would read him based off his real-time interactions and, again, I don't think scum is that open about "beetlejuicing" which makes him a town lean for me.

ok so just to be clear about part of the reason i'm suspicious of SA:
- his real time interactions are utterly lacking as well, they're not something i can really read him off of
- i just (as in two weeks ago just) played a game with him (i.e. see ss's pyp from like two weeks ago), wherein he was significantly easier to read, had real time interactions, popped in occasionally with thoughts, had follow-through between his posts, had significant scumreads, etc, while also being behind and having the same work schedule, so i don't think he should be given a pass here for that at all
- here he's just utterly blah, and i know he can not be as town, so i'm finding it scummy
- like @dats thoughts on sa this game vs that game? same for cakez, pooky, ss, if he read that game, andante?
- the issue i'm taking with his iv read is that it's very flat and shallow, and is nitpicking on like three or four posts and ignoring his body of work. it looks like he's struggling to find reads and to find something to scumread people for

In post 1806, skitter30 wrote:he was significantly easier to read, had real time interactions, popped in occasionally with thoughts, had follow-through between his posts, had significant scumreads, etc, while also being behind and having the same work schedule, so i don't think he should be given a pass here for that at all

In post 1812, skitter30 wrote:That was a fast moving game too >.>

In post 1815, skitter30 wrote:I think i might be tunneled and annoyed and need to think abt this less
Or differently idk
UNVOTE:

In post 1816, innocentvillager wrote:tiger wanna vote midwaybear together with me?

In post 1817, Sleepless Assassin wrote:That feels just as out of nowhere as the vote itself did

In post 1818, Faker wrote:

In post 1815, skitter30 wrote:I think i might be tunneled and annoyed and need to think abt this less
Or differently idk
UNVOTE: