Mafiascum.net

In post 1787, Titus wrote:

In post 1780, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1778, Titus wrote:Math, can you link the Parker game? I can't. Driving.

Sorry I am not sure which game you mean

And please don’t mafia and drive
It can wait a few hours

The one where I was a loyal jailkeeper and thought I was crumbing every single PR. Not Mafia was scum and missed a kill.

In post 1755, MathBlade wrote:I know you use aggression and emotion to get people on your side

In post 1787, Titus wrote:

In post 1780, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1778, Titus wrote:Math, can you link the Parker game? I can't. Driving.

Sorry I am not sure which game you mean

And please don’t mafia and drive
It can wait a few hours

The one where I was a loyal jailkeeper and thought I was crumbing every single PR. Not Mafia was scum and missed a kill.

In post 1797, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1746, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1741, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1738, MathBlade wrote:If you don’t understand my point then why are you continually asserting it’s wrong?

because the point is lost yet you're barking up a storm about how this is supposed to mean something

The point
Implosion asked about something that didn’t happen
I called him out
He then said Bella said she talked about my timer
Which is like not true?
Then called himself right

Like I feel like I am in the twilight zone with how much gas there is

bella thought your timer was the deadline for the game
that's what implosion was talking about when you said he "slipped"

In post 1803, MathBlade wrote:I still think he is scum though.

In post 1801, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1755, MathBlade wrote:I know you use aggression and emotion to get people on your side

how does this remotely resemble HQ's pay this game?

In post 1803, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1797, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1746, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1741, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1738, MathBlade wrote:If you don’t understand my point then why are you continually asserting it’s wrong?

because the point is lost yet you're barking up a storm about how this is supposed to mean something

The point
Implosion asked about something that didn’t happen
I called him out
He then said Bella said she talked about my timer
Which is like not true?
Then called himself right

Like I feel like I am in the twilight zone with how much gas there is

bella thought your timer was the deadline for the game
that's what implosion was talking about when you said he "slipped"

Yeah and I already apologized for misunderstanding implosions misunderstanding/miscopy/whatever you want to call it.

I still think he is scum though.

In post 1805, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1803, MathBlade wrote:I still think he is scum though.

why?? feels like you're sticking to a debunked read out of stubbornness rn

In post 1788, humaneatingmonkey wrote:uhhh.. im not disinterested in my own death. maybe before my surgery because i didn't know how long I'll be knocked out for and i didn't have the focus to fight my death (+ i didn't really want to hold the game, so IMO if d1 will flip town, there's no one better). but now im confident i can feel better and actually play this game soon. i'm more pointing out that scum would have switched after my claim because it's more advantageous for them to run up another slot and get another claim. it's basic d1 scum strat. so im kinda reconsidering if i'm still right that there's scum in my wagon. i could see that there's at least one so that the option doesn't fade away.

In post 1808, MathBlade wrote:Because he waffles everywhere and hasn’t had a concrete read

In post 1809, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1788, humaneatingmonkey wrote:uhhh.. im not disinterested in my own death. maybe before my surgery because i didn't know how long I'll be knocked out for and i didn't have the focus to fight my death (+ i didn't really want to hold the game, so IMO if d1 will flip town, there's no one better). but now im confident i can feel better and actually play this game soon. i'm more pointing out that scum would have switched after my claim because it's more advantageous for them to run up another slot and get another claim. it's basic d1 scum strat. so im kinda reconsidering if i'm still right that there's scum in my wagon. i could see that there's at least one so that the option doesn't fade away.

I look forward to seeing your grand re-entry

In post 1810, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1808, MathBlade wrote:Because he waffles everywhere and hasn’t had a concrete read

dunno if this is true
the other part is a fair call-out tbh, I think there's like 90% shot implo had some rationale to it tho

In post 1812, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1810, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1808, MathBlade wrote:Because he waffles everywhere and hasn’t had a concrete read

dunno if this is true
the other part is a fair call-out tbh, I think there's like 90% shot implo had some rationale to it tho

What do you think it is?

In post 1813, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1812, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1810, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1808, MathBlade wrote:Because he waffles everywhere and hasn’t had a concrete read

dunno if this is true
the other part is a fair call-out tbh, I think there's like 90% shot implo had some rationale to it tho

What do you think it is?

something based on knowing his own alignment probably
can't really extrapolate beyond that

In post 1806, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1801, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1755, MathBlade wrote:I know you use aggression and emotion to get people on your side

how does this remotely resemble HQ's pay this game?

HQ is using aggression and loaded words in her BS push of me.

It’s something she did a lot of in (game with her main) that I am infinitely familiar with her scum game there in that game.

I just can’t explain how without outing her. So I would rather not be believed than that.

In post 1819, MathBlade wrote:You’re obviously not or you’d agree with me you were loud and emotional in that game. It was tense all the way around.