Mafiascum.net

Cres, Alex, Eira.
Preferably Eira

I don't think it's a good idea when protective or investigative claims telegraph their targets because it helps scum build a roadmap for how to act at night.

In post 1801, Crescent wrote:I don't think it's a good idea when protective or investigative claims telegraph their targets because it helps scum build a roadmap for how to act at night.

^

In post 1800, gibus wrote:Cres, Alex, Eira.
Preferably Eira

Personally I'd prefer Alex over Eira, especially if BBT flips Red. Eira was a lot more of a non-factor today than on day 1.

But this is the point, different people would have different priorities.

Whoever among you is town, be it one of you or both of you, should just follow their heart so scum doesn't know who you're targeting.

Well in the case of two Protectives Targeting the same person it just garuntees they can't die. Sure I have a chance to die if they RB Gibus so my BG takes effect but we garuntee it otherwise.

We can have me and Gibus agree in general to be on the three of you or something.

... making this plan was more of a way to help garuntee we can be held accountable for our actions. But if you want me to just Protect who I think I should I'll trust it then.

IMO I think it's best to not announce who you are targeting given the likelihood of a roleblocker.

In post 1805, Elsa Jay wrote:... making this plan was more of a way to help garuntee we can be held accountable for our actions. But if you want me to just Protect who I think I should I'll trust it then.

It's kind of impossible to hold you "accountable" for your claimed actions anyway.

If one of you is scum, the one who's town presumably just gets blocked (Though, Gibus' claim is why we are insinuating RB in the first place..), and the one who's scum claims they visited the wrong person. Only an actual no kill has significant meaning, and a no kill is much less likely if scum knows who the town is planning to target.

That wagon on me sure was fast.

I have to go to work soon, too. You probably shouldn't elim me

Oh speaking of kills I have an important question about how the game is run here and it's late and I don't feel like finding the one page in the Wiki that might answer this.

Is the scum kill compulsory, or can scum elect not to kill anyone? I know on MafiaUniverse scum is forced to kill every night. Where I primarily come from, scum can voluntarily elect not to kill anyone as a means to mess with the game.

They can elect not to kill

Huh. That's not the answer I expected, actually. Good to know.

You should unvote me now.

In post 1500, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:35 hours is not a lot of time considering there are 10 people to act/post/vote cohesively.

What ends up happening is a ridiculous flash wagon and then town end up losing for taking so damn long on every single elim.

You don't need to take up every second of every Day.

Oh, the irony.

You already had 2 votes (and had them for a while) and then you got 2 more votes and no one wants to vote the other guy with votes.

That's... Not a flash wagon. NM would be a flash wagon.

Anyway it's past 2am I'm cutting myself off.

Sure because I looked highly likely to be elimmed just 12 hours ago, right?

In post 1800, gibus wrote:Cres, Alex, Eira.
Preferably Eira

all imma say is keep ur options open

ok don't see vc maybe i'll make one. 7 1/2 hours left so i got till..... 4 pm ? so y'all gonna hear from me.

Vivax(2) BBT(4) btw soz

In post 1785, Elsa Jay wrote:Corwin I think we're outnumbered here?

Are we gonna quick launch so Toffee doesn't have a chance to claim or are we just gonna pray it'll be scum lying about it and not another town PR?

In post 1792, Elsa Jay wrote:I just know NotMaf is somehow watching and ready to hammer now. I feel it in my bones. But yeah you convinced me to vote there.

We need someone else to vote tho. I don't wanna give him the satisfaction of a hammer. And deprive people like Gera from responding I guess.

UNVOTE:

In post 1795, Elsa Jay wrote:Actually with 9 hours left and me about to fall asleep I don't trust y'all to actually vote it in time without my vote on it. I'm off to bed. See ya either tomorrow or day 3.

VOTE: Toffee

Sorry you replaced into a scum slot dude. I know the feeling.

In post 1796, gibus wrote:UNVOTE:

all i'm gonna say is this progression on page 73 makes me feel way better about gibus.

page 72

In post 1819, Eiralox wrote:Vivax(2) BBT(4) btw soz

You forgot to take me off Vivax when you put me on BBT. Vivax(1).

1st UNVOTE:

In post 1620, Crescent wrote:Did Gera just really put together an argument on Gibus quoting like 8 posts only for Gibus to say "Nah"

yep

In post 1624, gibus wrote:town combined doctor checker

oh FFS....

In post 1646, Elsa Jay wrote:Considering I'm a [Redacted]-Enabler Bodyguard, you should probably not vote me either.

How we get two people ready to claim Protectives day 2 is the miracles of RNG.

ok....

[For my memory, claims i can remember then are Elsa - bodyguard with extra
Gibus - doctor checker]

i have no reason to not accept these claims right now. they will get sorted out in due time.

In post 1664, Alexcellent wrote:VOTE: BBT prefer this over Vivax.

Alex is very quick to get new wagons going

going to post this now so people can see i am reading, will carry on then

Vivax (1): Not_Mafia
BlueBloodedToffee (4): Alexcellent, Crsecent, Corwinoid, Elsa Jay
gibus (1): geraintm
Crescent (1): Vivax
geraintm (1): BlueBloodedToffee

Not voting (1): Eiralox, gibus

With 10 alive, it takes 6 to launch.


i thank dat's right