Mafiascum.net

In post 1795, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1794, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1790, MathBlade wrote:So since Pooky thought switching from BGC to greeting despite it 4 and 4 and both being town in that world.

That doesn’t add up to me.

Okay: what if Pooky!scum prefers to keep town!BGC and town!frog in the game so they can clash? That would line up with Kitty being the nightkill as well.

Then based on the VCs Pooky stays on Malcolm and never swaps to BGC.

Source 1.5 and 1.6

>_<

So Pooky + BGC makes more sense?

@Titus

I swear I am dumb. Who did you investigate please?

I know you said we would see it on death but I can’t find it.

In post 1798, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1795, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1794, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1790, MathBlade wrote:So since Pooky thought switching from BGC to greeting despite it 4 and 4 and both being town in that world.

That doesn’t add up to me.

Okay: what if Pooky!scum prefers to keep town!BGC and town!frog in the game so they can clash? That would line up with Kitty being the nightkill as well.

Then based on the VCs Pooky stays on Malcolm and never swaps to BGC.

Source 1.5 and 1.6

>_<

So Pooky + BGC makes more sense?

If you have to force Pooky then yeah Pooky + BGC makes more sense

That at least has a narrative of fake vote, forced bus, off to greeting but that’s tenuous. But less tenuous than your proposed team.

I would rather than force people, ask questions

Why did Greeting die after split wagons?
Why did Kitty die?

My answers 1) Because scum wagon
And 2) Because Kitty was right

I feel make a lot more sense.

In post 1757, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I followed Titus last night and she performed an investigative action

I'm assuming she got some kind of inno on Frogster cuz she said this:

In post 1588, Titus wrote:

In post 1585, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1582, MathBlade wrote:Why are you so against me trying to lead coordination?

If you're you have no idea what you're doing right now

+1 I have like 95% certainty on Frogsterking town.

Which really makes sense only if you're TPR and you're crumbing your night 1 inno - therefore she should be town.

If you're Town, why did you claim all this instead of trying to talk you're way out?

In post 1802, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1757, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I followed Titus last night and she performed an investigative action

I'm assuming she got some kind of inno on Frogster cuz she said this:

In post 1588, Titus wrote:

In post 1585, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1582, MathBlade wrote:Why are you so against me trying to lead coordination?

If you're you have no idea what you're doing right now

+1 I have like 95% certainty on Frogsterking town.

Which really makes sense only if you're TPR and you're crumbing your night 1 inno - therefore she should be town.

If you're Town, why did you claim all this instead of trying to talk you're way out?

I kinda think if anyone is scum of the pairing it’s Titus tbh.

I have a reason for this but I want Titus to give her result.

+why did you follow Titus?

In post 1804, Frogsterking wrote:+why did you follow Titus?

Could be both actually. Both works too,

In post 1803, MathBlade wrote:I kinda think if anyone is scum of the pairing it’s Titus tbh.

I have a reason for this but I want Titus to give her result.

Why does it feel like you're trying to out all the roles?

I feel like I'm being lied to.

Mainly I think Titus if town would have a hard inno.

But if she’s faking at having not having a hard inno to survive I want her to out her target.

In post 1808, MathBlade wrote:Mainly I think Titus if town would have a hard inno.

But if she’s faking at having not having a hard inno to survive I want her to out her target.

Ok.

In post 1806, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1803, MathBlade wrote:I kinda think if anyone is scum of the pairing it’s Titus tbh.

I have a reason for this but I want Titus to give her result.

Why does it feel like you're trying to out all the roles?

Because I think there’s a well crafted manipulation going on and I want to break it open to be useful.

If three powerful investigation roles exist then we can ensure maximum information before death.

(Yes I am invest but voyeur sucks without being able to actually find where people are investing)
So I literally have to roll the dice

The less dice I have to roll the better off we are.

In post 1808, MathBlade wrote:Mainly I think Titus if town would have a hard inno.

But if she’s faking at having not having a hard inno to survive I want her to out her target.

My role, for the most part, precludes hard innos.

I'll give my full thoughts once I get into my hotel.

I think, regardless of Pooky's alignment, that he did investigate me.

In post 1813, Titus wrote:

In post 1808, MathBlade wrote:Mainly I think Titus if town would have a hard inno.

But if she’s faking at having not having a hard inno to survive I want her to out her target.

My role, for the most part, precludes hard innos.

Then you have the world’s most contradictory crumbs.

In post 1815, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1813, Titus wrote:

In post 1808, MathBlade wrote:Mainly I think Titus if town would have a hard inno.

But if she’s faking at having not having a hard inno to survive I want her to out her target.

My role, for the most part, precludes hard innos.

Then you have the world’s most contradictory crumbs.

You have the wrong crumbs.

Definitely looking forward to that explanation for sure.

In post 1817, MathBlade wrote:Definitely looking forward to that explanation for sure.

Great. You can get it when I flip. Crumbs are role dependent and I have no desire to claim.

Since you already claimed, do you care to share your result? Or are you content crumbing?

In post 1818, Titus wrote:

In post 1817, MathBlade wrote:Definitely looking forward to that explanation for sure.

Great. You can get it when I flip. Crumbs are role dependent and I have no desire to claim.

Since you already claimed, do you care to share your result? Or are you content crumbing?

Already did.

Cape had no one visit them.

In post 1819, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1818, Titus wrote:

In post 1817, MathBlade wrote:Definitely looking forward to that explanation for sure.

Great. You can get it when I flip. Crumbs are role dependent and I have no desire to claim.

Since you already claimed, do you care to share your result? Or are you content crumbing?

Already did.

Cape had no one visit them.

I did not visit Cape, so no contradiction.

If I have to get it after your flip I am okay flipping you now since your claim contradicts your crumbs.

I’d rather work together to form a plan to confirm invests and who is truth telling and not.

I’d like to maybe have all invests gather on you and you visit someone

Pooky says who you visited and I report how many visited you,

Win win

I have 95% confidence on Frogsterking because of my read of him. That was my read yesterday as well, so I don't get why any of you thought that was a crumb.

My read comes from recognizing him in the anon game. Could I be wrong? Sure, but I don't think I am.