Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2014 9:39 pm
Bite me
why would I do this? I don't really have three names.In post 1823, zMuffinMan wrote:give me three names for scum nacho
Why does having reads you disagree with make him scummy?In post 1824, zMuffinMan wrote:if bert is so obvtown then why do all his reads suck?nacho wrote:I dunno why Muffin thinks you are scum and it boggles the mind that he could be reading obvtown as scum for this long
So he might b scum
and if you think i'm scum, why are you voting my neighbour and not me?
IK is scum???In post 1832, zMuffinMan wrote:ok. that's cool. i don't really give a shit. you were claiming you didn't know why i thought bert could be scum; i just told you.
now give me your reads
you either didn't read or you have comprehension issues. it's not the fact that he buddied me; it's the fact that it was awkward as fuck and didn't make any sense. did you read the early game? he was bringing up a single past game, going on about how my reads there were good, etc and none of it made any sense in this game; there was no reason for him to bring it up or talk about it as much as he didnacho wrote:-He was buddying you. How is this a scumtell?
ok. you're generalising my issue here but whatever. what do you like about his reads?nacho wrote:-His reads feel manufactured. his reads feel genuine to me!
thoughts on where you stand with every player. strength of the reads is important as well.nacho wrote:IK is scum???
i analyse motivation. scum motivation for bert is that it gives him something to talk about and it's designed to get me on his side. town motivation is ?????? <- it's awkward because i can't see the town motivation for itnacho wrote:Why does something not making sense translate into it being scummy?
normally i wouldn't care but i think there's a decent chance you're scum here and i want to have something i can hold you against when your reads change. for example, i still have no idea what the fuck you were doing at the start of this day phase and why you were voting goodfather and asking people to sheep you, and i *think* your read there has changed but you've not really mentioned it at all. same for every other fucking read you've given.nacho wrote:Also why is me giving you a reads list so important to you?
Nacho has no comprehension issues, and I have no learning disabilities. Only visual/physical discomfort and nothing else broIn post 1835, zMuffinMan wrote:you either didn't read or you have comprehension issues. it's not the fact that he buddied me; it's the fact that it was awkward as fuck and didn't make any sense. did you read the early game? he was bringing up a single past game, going on about how my reads there were good, etc and none of it made any sense in this game; there was no reason for him to bring it up or talk about it as much as he didnacho wrote:-He was buddying you. How is this a scumtell?
ok. you're generalising my issue here but whatever. what do you like about his reads?nacho wrote:-His reads feel manufactured. his reads feel genuine to me!
thoughts on where you stand with every player. strength of the reads is important as well.nacho wrote:IK is scum???
i ask whether you have a learning disability because this shows you're either retarded or you weren't reading what i was writing. i don't care whether you've done "controversial" things like vote hopping - the issue is that all of your reads were going with the flow of the game (they changed only in line with how other players were thinking) and nothing you were saying about people was going against the grain in any way. this isn't a scum tell, per se, but it is one of the reasons i think the way you were approaching reads wasn't genuinebert wrote:Lack of controversy???
and again, another thing that points to you being either retarded or not reading properly. i was clearly reading the game D1, but if you were to ask me about stuff that happened D1, i could give you, at best, a skimmed-the-thread answer. i was chronicling most of my thoughts on the game D1 in my neighbourhood, too. what the fuck kind of response is this? roflbert wrote:Why did I flip flop so much on D1? Oh wait you haven't been reading the game right?? You can still change your tune
retarded or not readingbert wrote:Buddying??? Lmao not a scumtell
retarded or not readingbert wrote:Not making sense, fake??? Bullshit fluff for scumtells. Post something real
nobody asked me for my reads, i am asking nacho, though. retarded or not readingbert wrote:As for asking Nacho for reads lists and strengths of reads and reasons, look in the mirror lol!!!
Town motivation isn't something that's so clearly defined as "it's advantageous for me to do this as town and this I'm doing it": scum motivation is generally easier to explain because playing scum brings a much more conscious thought process with it. Bert's motivation for buddying up with you as scum is probably more along the lines of trying to mimic his town meta. As for why he does it as town, fuck if I know but his title is based on him bringing up random fucking games and making random fucking comparisons to them so you picking on that because you don't see the town motivation behind that is invalid because it's happened so many times before when he was town. Why do you think Bert would be concerned about manipulating you when you probably won't have much swing in determining whether to lynch him or not?In post 1838, zMuffinMan wrote:i analyse motivation. scum motivation for bert is that it gives him something to talk about and it's designed to get me on his side. town motivation is ?????? <- it's awkward because i can't see the town motivation for itnacho wrote:Why does something not making sense translate into it being scummy?
normally i wouldn't care but i think there's a decent chance you're scum here and i want to have something i can hold you against when your reads change. for example, i still have no idea what the fuck you were doing at the start of this day phase and why you were voting goodfather and asking people to sheep you, and i *think* your read there has changed but you've not really mentioned it at all. same for every other fucking read you've given.nacho wrote:Also why is me giving you a reads list so important to you?
Also, I understand you get this way sometimes, but please don't be a giant dick to Bert who doesn't deserve it and probably is one of the nicest people who play this game.In post 1844, zMuffinMan wrote:actually, i should be saying "retarded AND possibly not reading"
there is nothing you can say that will convince me you are not retarded
There's nothing you've done to convince me your play hasn't been chickendungIn post 1844, zMuffinMan wrote:actually, i should be saying "retarded AND possibly not reading"
there is nothing you can say that will convince me you are not retarded
I put that in all my posts at the same day.In post 1843, zMuffinMan wrote:oh, and before i forget, another thing i didn't like about bert was the awkward response to my vote on him (a la "HEY IF YOU PUT ME AT L-1 I MIGHT SELF HAMMER SO DON'T DO THAT!!") - really out of place at that time, and also really out of place if he was being genuine about improving his game