Batshitness is correlated with townieness for mollie I think. You have to invert your read.
But I don't see scum mollie much.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 5:44 am
by Iecerint
In post 1824, Your New Gay Overlords wrote:There's a whole slew of people with less posts than the fucking moderator and that's kinda bothersome.
Nuwen has the same number of posts
as a dead player
. Uh.
Eagle/Pie/Axxle/Cheery are also light on content as well.
I dislike lurking as I feel it's a safe way for scum to hide. Axxle kind of disappeared when the wagon on him happened and whattyaknow it died down.
Nuwen has few posts and some scumminess I think, but her actual posts are pretty content-y.
Axxle I stopped liking because of Nah.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:01 am
by Your New Gay Overlords
Yeah that's my thought on Nuwen. She's lacking in quantity but I kind of don't mind her few posts she has? Pie seems to have a big issue with it but idk
Funny thing is I think the two players I have almost no opinion on at this point are Cheery & EagleKit
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:03 am
by A Simple Math Problem
I dont have any hilarious funny jokez to post here.
Deadline: April 3rd @ 3PM Commune Time
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:09 am
by Untrod Tripod
Me calling for your lynch is backing down now? Okay sugartits whatever you say
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:29 am
by Iecerint
In post 1827, Your New Gay Overlords wrote:Funny thing is I think the two players I have almost no opinion on at this point are Cheery & EagleKit
Yep.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:35 am
by Your New Gay Overlords
In post 1829, Untrod Tripod wrote:Me calling for your lynch is backing down now? Okay sugartits whatever you say
In post 1804, Ythan wrote:Show me the shitty mafia theory and I will consider voting Iec.
shitty theory =/= scum
Show me the shitty mafia theory.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:12 am
by Ythan
or I will consider voting you, I should have added.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:13 am
by Ythan
In post 1809, Untrod Tripod wrote:And waffles claimed a one shot hider but begged the vig not to shoot them tonight because "we might get killed". That claim sucks and you're buying it for some reason and calling me scummy for not assuming confirmed town based on their claim.
This is a good point.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:15 am
by Ythan
Wherein Ethan responds as he reads along.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:20 am
by pirate mollie
wow its almost like when I first brought up multi-ball that I said a possiblity of 2 teams or scum team + sk or a number of indies before triforce claimed and then flipped or something its almost as if some1 is taking what I said out of context!
but mebbe I am just batshit crazy and am imagining it.
so glad every1 also read the posts where I said for like 2 game days that ut was likely scum cos of the focus on indies to the exclusion of scumhunting but it is super kewl that every1 is catching on to him!
and yaye! ty iceyrent <3 for finally thinking about cheery and eaglekit and I am being sincere cos they have lurked around the edges cheery especially looks really bad and those 2 have been bugging me. I am probably going to vote ut I just want to a little time to sort the murkier reads which is why I dunno am trying to engage them????
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:33 am
by Iecerint
In post 1837, pirate mollie wrote:<3 for finally thinking about cheery and eaglekit and I am being sincere cos they have lurked around the edges cheery especially looks really bad and those 2 have been bugging me. I am probably going to vote ut I just want to a little time to sort the murkier reads which is why I dunno am trying to engage them????
Given this, I'm a little surprised that you voted cheerydog right after his post about Nuwen. Can you clarify why you voted him in that post?
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:34 am
by Faraday
In post 470, pirate mollie wrote:also I am just going to open it up that in my role pm (I freaking hate doing this) there was a hint that this game might be multi-factional which explains why I have so few town reads.
ah yes "out of context"
(survivor =/= multi faction, they're an annoyance that's it - your win condition or role Pm doesn't actually imply anything,was the point as I just showed by linking to a similar win condition in another game with ONE SCUM FACTION)
sorry you can't read/accept you're wrong? my bad for expecting you to be able to xoxoxoxxoxo please don't respond to this as I might accidentally read it.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:35 am
by Faraday
is mollie's game plan to suspect everyone in the game so she can proclaim herself a mad genuins @ endgame and like quote posts and say she nailed the scum cos lol
In post 470, pirate mollie wrote:also I am just going to open it up that in my role pm (I freaking hate doing this) there was a hint that this game might be multi-factional which explains why I have so few town reads.
ah yes "out of context"
(survivor =/= multi faction, they're an annoyance that's it - your win condition or role Pm doesn't actually imply anything,was the point as I just showed by linking to a similar win condition in another game with ONE SCUM FACTION)
sorry you can't read/accept you're wrong? my bad for expecting you to be able to xoxoxoxxoxo please don't respond to this as I might accidentally read it.
In post 1840, Faraday wrote:is mollie's game plan to suspect everyone in the game so she can proclaim herself a mad genuins @ endgame and like quote posts and say she nailed the scum cos lol
In post 1837, pirate mollie wrote:<3 for finally thinking about cheery and eaglekit and I am being sincere cos they have lurked around the edges cheery especially looks really bad and those 2 have been bugging me. I am probably going to vote ut I just want to a little time to sort the murkier reads which is why I dunno am trying to engage them????
Given this, I'm a little surprised that you voted cheerydog right after his post about Nuwen. Can you clarify why you voted him in that post?
I was trying to get an interactive dialogue going to sort him out. it wasn't for that 1 post it was body of work and his is very weak and I am telling you cheery is capable of so much more. I thought he would have gotten more reactive but I am unsure cos the meta might be a bit outdated. interaction is primarily what I base most of my reads on altho sometimes I can them off of other things. cheery is some1 I need more interaction with so I can get a better feel. so far he feels wrong but it seems weird to go from "yeah mollie waffles is scum!" to "oh wait its mollie just kidding!" and axxle did it too that is thing that pisses me off about that whole fiasco is that it gave scum room to hide and I am thinking at least a couple of them are using it as a smokescreen to plug up the game and get away with not scumhunting.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:44 am
by Iecerint
Gotcha.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:17 pm
by Cheery Dog
In post 1812, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:
Also, love that no one is considering the possibility of ythan being a scum vig. Like his play makes no sense for town, but whatevs.
I don't consider it worth paying that much attention to him yet, while I consider it's still a possibility, the scum who are most definity scum are much better to focus on.
In post 1824, Your New Gay Overlords wrote:There's a whole slew of people with less posts than the fucking moderator and that's kinda bothersome.
Nuwen has the same number of posts
as a dead player
. Uh.
Eagle/Pie/Axxle/Cheery are also light on content as well.
I dislike lurking as I feel it's a safe way for scum to hide. Axxle kind of disappeared when the wagon on him happened and whattyaknow it died down.
The moderators a hydra, they have double the posting time frame of me. Also I'm still in the wrong fucking timezone, you're not likely to get me becoming one of the highest posters.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:32 pm
by Iecerint
In post 1845, Cheery Dog wrote:I don't consider it worth paying that much attention to him yet, while I consider it's still a possibility, the scum who are most definity scum are much better to focus on.
In post 1845, Cheery Dog wrote:I don't consider it worth paying that much attention to him yet, while I consider it's still a possibility, the scum who are most definity scum are much better to focus on.
Good thinking! So, who are they?
In this case, I believe Nuwen & Mollie.
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 12:56 pm
by Iecerint
Mollie has already explained that the reason for her inference was the "All threats to the town language," implying multiple threats (since found out to be standard AP modding language regardless of scumteam set-up). This is also in the sample town PM.
However, when you voted for Mollie, you used the above logic as the basis for it. So, do you think it's unlikely that Mollie could infer that, or do you think she is scum for other reasons, too?
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:00 pm
by Cheery Dog
There's also the other post of mine you didn't read where I voted Nuwen.
