Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 4:29 am
well, uhm, offer still stands but farside more or less made the case I was going to make.
Page 74 of 96
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 4:33 am
so to be clear, neither of you have anything substantial at all
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 4:46 am
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:so to be clear, neither of you have anything substantial at all
Oh I missed the good case and reasoning you had.
Oh that is right you don't make any case this far and throw shit at people who do.
The town reason for that is what?
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 4:58 am
I know I am town and you are making a shit case on town.
Why wouldn't I point that out?
Why wouldn't I point that out?
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 5:17 am
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:I know I am town and you are making a shit case on town.
Why wouldn't I point that out?
farside22 wrote:↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:so to be clear, neither of you have anything substantial at all
Oh I missed the good case and reasoning you had.
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 5:27 am
You're not thinking straight if you think the burden of proof is on the person being accused when there is no substantial evidence to even respond to.
Can you prove to me there aren't lizard in the center of the earth?
Can you prove to me there aren't lizard in the center of the earth?
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 6:06 am
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:You're not thinking straight if you think the burden of proof is on the person being accused when there is no substantial evidence to even respond to.
Can you prove to me there aren't lizard in the center of the earth?
Somehow reading this I think of Johnny cockran saying if the glove don't fit you must acquit.
Yet, you haven't made a case on why you think myko is scum, like I said, or why you think csa is scum.
Or shit about why anyone is scum that is
new
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:09 am
Farside your main case on AK is that he's scumreading people he's not voting for, right?
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:10 am
↑ SABBATHonSABBATH wrote:Farside your main case on AK is that he's scumreading people he's not voting for, right?
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:17 am
↑ Flubbernugget wrote:↑ SABBATHonSABBATH wrote:Farside your main case on AK is that he's scumreading people he's not voting for, right?
That was in regards to reck.
Pretty much opportunistic today for whom he'd vote for. No new reason why he's voting csa.
Day 2 was him agreeing with csa, now calling csa scum again, reasons are because?
In short his reads/reasoning is not fluid and shows no thought process to whom is scum.
If you want links to his games where he shows forward thinking, let me know.
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:31 am
you remember when I opened day 2 with a case where I said I was 85% sure csareo was scum?
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:33 am
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:you remember when I opened day 2 with a case where I said I was 85% sure csareo was scum?
That was a case built with multiple quotes that explained next to nothing and tied a player that is town with csa
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:40 am
And you're tying me (a player that is town) to scum. How is that any better?
Plus, I said I was only 65% sure they were BOTH scum.
Plus, I said I was only 65% sure they were BOTH scum.
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:01 am
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:And you're tying me (a player that is town) to scum. How is that any better?
Plus, I said I was only 65% sure they were BOTH scum.
You are tying me to csa so....?
Your points/rebuttal is pretty weak right now.
All it is, simply is you saying the case is weak, you providing no case and then just bitching.
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:38 am
Okay I agree with Farside's case on Reck but still don't get her case on AK.
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:45 pm
↑ Flubbernugget wrote:Okay I agree with Farside's case on Reck but still don't get her case on AK.
Walk me through what you are missing?
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 2:19 pm
Used wifom to make TSO look scummy?
Btw I had no idea what the fuck was going on with TSO's soft claim either. Although I understand what happened now.
Btw I had no idea what the fuck was going on with TSO's soft claim either. Although I understand what happened now.
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:26 pm
My theory is the same. Myko and Anatole are scum, if and only if reckoner and TSO weren't hardbussing mafiassk.
Based purely on physical non associative tells, I'm scum reading flubber, but that's pretty light.
Based purely on physical non associative tells, I'm scum reading flubber, but that's pretty light.
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:30 pm
what is a physical tell
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 4:06 pm
↑ Flubbernugget wrote:Used wifom to make TSO look scummy?
Btw I had no idea what the fuck was going on with TSO's soft claim either. Although I understand what happened now.
Anatole in one post says he didn't get what was going on, the wants a full claim with the idea if a CC.
The says tso could be scum still with no CC.
Used post 1638 as wifom
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:23 pm
You know more than me, please expand.
↑ Flubbernugget wrote:↑ SABBATHonSABBATH wrote:Farside your main case on AK is that he's scumreading people he's not voting for, right?
Dude. WTF.
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:36 am
Dude calm your tits I'm still trying to figure out what she's saying.
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:38 am
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:41 am
Would anybody like to try and convince me to stop scum-tunneling Myko/Reck?
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 1:56 am
Not particulary. You could try to understand farsides case once more. It's not hard.
TSO softclaims a guilty of sorts on SSK, anatole's buddy. Anatole hops on, it's SSK after all, you let him go.
Then, csareo comes in and casts doubt on TSO's claim. It doesn't look good. Anatole hops off, "csareo is making sense".
Then, when town figures out they do want to follow TSO, anatole knows he needs to be back in his good looking early bussing spot: he's on again.
That unvote is opportunistic scum play. That's where you catch anatole, not in the hundreds of posts asking questions and setting things up. Like I complained earlier on, anatole has a defensive playstyle this game. It aims to explain every action they do, doesn't focus on outplaying scum, finding them. This was a point where there's an action he tries to explain, but does it wishy washy: he stepped out. His "csareo was kind of making good points", but him not joining him in voting TSO, for example, is a weak play that he's trying to avoid here when we pushed him on it, he's got only weak excuses. This is the point where he shows his intentions, this was the crack in his armor.
TSO softclaims a guilty of sorts on SSK, anatole's buddy. Anatole hops on, it's SSK after all, you let him go.
Then, csareo comes in and casts doubt on TSO's claim. It doesn't look good. Anatole hops off, "csareo is making sense".
Then, when town figures out they do want to follow TSO, anatole knows he needs to be back in his good looking early bussing spot: he's on again.
That unvote is opportunistic scum play. That's where you catch anatole, not in the hundreds of posts asking questions and setting things up. Like I complained earlier on, anatole has a defensive playstyle this game. It aims to explain every action they do, doesn't focus on outplaying scum, finding them. This was a point where there's an action he tries to explain, but does it wishy washy: he stepped out. His "csareo was kind of making good points", but him not joining him in voting TSO, for example, is a weak play that he's trying to avoid here when we pushed him on it, he's got only weak excuses. This is the point where he shows his intentions, this was the crack in his armor.