"titus came in forming alliances" ≠ "titus resisted alliances up until now, 200-odd posts later"
In post 1823, Persivul wrote:2. you seemed fine with
being in my "alliance", why are you making it sound like it was a bad thing taht Titus did it?
Again, what is scum!pers's motivation to poke the bear? You quote my post, then pick at the details while avoiding what's really important. In your case, I don't know if that's scummy or confbias.
what is anyone's motivation to poke the bear? town-ness. or wanting to be seen as town. but... what is scum-persivul's motivation to want to be seen as town? shit, idk man, you tell me.
as far as me picking at the details instead of avoiding what's really important:
1. well,
this, for one
2. what "important" stuff did i miss? seems like a pissing match between you and someone else again.
with regards to "
idk if thats scummy or confbias"
1.
....déjà vu; ... a pattern of shade throwing and ad hominem i deduce, qui-gon.
2.
and it's pretty easy to see: if you
Actually Care About Reading ISOs, like you do for ETL, you SHOULD DEFINITELY be reading mine,
if you don't know if i'm "
scummy or confbiased" or "
a fucking idiot", and
ESPECIALLY
after you
asked me to comment on ETL, and I prompted you to "
read my ISO"
so:
if you HAD iso'd me, you should probably have seen that my
previously solid town read (including me
inviting you to my vote block)
gradually devolved into scummy based entirely on
your scummy posts.... including
encouraging people to vote for you.
which leads me to:
3.
according to
His Majesty the King, apparently i'm
NOT
a "
fucking idiot".
so... you think i'm "scummy or confbiased" then? well, you
also should know
i'm not confbiased based on a) the aforementioned strong town read i had on you devolving due to scumminess galore, and b)
my total 180 on titus (hint: that shit's also in my iso).
therefore,
you should think i'm scum.
but you've only ever just done the really wishwashy weasely "you're either dumb or scum" thing which basically is scum shorthand for
"HEY EVERYONE. DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO THIS OPINION"
which is essentially the archetype of ad hominem.
in essence you're talking to me like i'm town, BUT you're throwing shade on me, and you're pandering to wide audiences with your backhanded accusations/ad hominem attacks of me, instead of bringing up things which would imply one way or the other, you've just stated that i'm scum or stupid multiple times, as if saying something enough times will make it true (another favorite scum tactic).
also
, your false dichotomy 1v1 of you vs. magna as the scum in the neighborhood, which, as town, you shouldn't have had.
also also
wik
, you've fallen to one of my favorite scum tells: the "
this is what i would have done as scum" tell. townies don't need to do that shit, and doing it implies "i am aware of what HYPOTHETICAL scum me would do, and i am NOT DOING THAT". just doesn't feel natural for a townie to say it, especially the way you said it. talking about yourself in the third person as scum!pers as if distancing from that, doesn't help your case. it damns you more.
also also also
, (not that i need to scrape the bottom of the barrel, but) in hindsight, i feel that your activity levels are more indicative of scum than town, given the limited meta i have on you —
recently (scum), and also as town, which was
a year ago, as you were
so quick to mention.
also also also also
, (since i'm on a roll here), generally speaking, i just don't think you're striking the proper tone with people on your wagon. that feels scummy too.
hence
boom son, you ded
pew pew pew
put that shit in your pipe and smoke it
