In post 1709, Drone wrote:What makes me doubt Titus is a backup is the fact that there is no neighbourizer. But I'm not taking the risk. We have a JOAT.
Why do you doubt that neighbor could be a modifier added to a universal backup?
@mod
-- Hypothetical question that you may not be able to answer: Are modifiers (if they exist) applied randomly (like roles) or would they be mod-assigned to specific roles as part of the setup?
Gimme a sec to get back to you on whether I can answer this.
In post 1709, Drone wrote:What makes me doubt Titus is a backup is the fact that there is no neighbourizer. But I'm not taking the risk. We have a JOAT.
Why do you doubt that neighbor could be a modifier added to a universal backup?
@mod
-- Hypothetical question that you may not be able to answer: Are modifiers (if they exist) applied randomly (like roles) or would they be mod-assigned to specific roles as part of the setup?
Gimme a sec to get back to you on whether I can answer this.
The setup was reviewed for normalcy and balance. This includes all roles and any modifiers that may or may not exist.
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 5:10 pm
by Impoetic
Can titus not imitate her town meta as scum? Can you elaborate on how she's played to her town meta that you think doesn't apply to her scumgame? and what shenanigans? i literally only defended myself from random accusations and made a few random posts with initial thoughts. The things TTTT mentioned were way back at daystart. Are you saying you, along with drone and TTTT, only just noticed something scummy about them now? Be more specific about why it's scummy, since TTTT has yet to retaliate to anything I've said about it.
In fact, be more specific about everything.
Why is lurking and being AFK scummy? I don't think antitown and scum are one and the same.
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 5:11 pm
by Impoetic
that was all @sesq, I missed some posts since then. Sorry, I keep forgetting to preview.
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 5:13 pm
by Titus
Still waiting on any reason for a townread Drone.
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 5:22 pm
by Sesq
In post 1832, Impoetic wrote:that was all @sesq, I missed some posts since then. Sorry, I keep forgetting to preview.
I was thinking that my point of titus's meta wasnt very good after posting it, but idk. I don't really see scum there, just weird town. but rask is lurking, and her former slot was also a lurker/barely did anything. gerry is obv
In post 1832, Impoetic wrote:that was all @sesq, I missed some posts since then. Sorry, I keep forgetting to preview.
I was thinking that my point of titus's meta wasnt very good after posting it, but idk. I don't really see scum there, just weird town. but rask is lurking, and her former slot was also a lurker/barely did anything. gerry is obv
Which one's weird town?
And I just don't understand why lurking is inherently scummy. In my experience -- which is admittedly minimal -- town is just as likely to lurk as scum. Like, in an ideal world, maaaybe that wouldn't be true, but
I don't think it's really that much more optimal for scum than town and I don't think that's what generally goes through your mind as scum (at least not if you're anything like me; I understand some people take a more strategic approach). I think scum are generally more involved than VTs? And have a more urgent motivation to not get lynched by PoE/lurk. It might be antitown for people to lurk overall, hence the ideal world comment, but yeah. I don't see how it's inherent that lurking=scummy, and I feel like that's a really easy way to write off an FoS and not put pressure on yourself for it.
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 6:16 pm
by gerryoat
In post 1809, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Fine I'll spill, I'm actually a 2-shot follower. Didn't want to give it away but you guys won't leave things alone.
rofl
In post 1811, Sesq wrote:I really don't trust role stuff as
a) really, anything can happen
b) it's based off people's unbacked claims
gerry, your defense is terrible. Actually defend yourself with logic or i'm voting you
rofl you're garbage dude. do you need mentoring? I will mentor you in finding mafia, if need be.
In post 1809, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Fine I'll spill, I'm actually a 2-shot follower. Didn't want to give it away but you guys won't leave things alone.
Is this one of those things where you keep returning results and we find out you're actually a seventy five shot something or other?
But no this is the real deal.
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 6:20 pm
by gerryoat
UNVOTE: Lil Uzi
Probably still mafia for the bad claim and then the bad next claim. But I'll unvote for now.
If it's not obvious I was the counter wagon to RB. and people are trying to do it again. I don't get how people can be so bad in games when it should be obvious I'm town.
It's a wonder that you miraculously suggest a plan that has us not lynch you or Drone, and lines you up to kill your vocal critics. Coincidence? You expect me to buy that?
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 8:12 pm
by shannon
In post 1832, Impoetic wrote:that was all @sesq, I missed some posts since then. Sorry, I keep forgetting to preview.
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 8:13 pm
by shannon
Not sure how that happened, ignore 1842. What I meant to do is:
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 8:13 pm
by shannon
In post 1833, Titus wrote:Still waiting on any reason for a townread Drone.
In post 1795, Drone wrote:If we successfully lynch scum today, there's absolutely no way we're lynching Titus tomorrow, unless guilty by someone. (if any)
Agreed. If we get scum today, especially if that scum is someone Titus scum reads, she's town tomorrow.
That's not what I said, and where I'm heading at..
In post 1802, gerryoat wrote:Hey guys, can we think logically? Why would there be a
1 shot
tracker in a game with a JOAT.
Why would Lil Uzi out right away when there was no votes on him, and he didn't need to claim. It's not like he had a useful report, he had nothing.
This is indeed something I agree with.
In post 1809, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Fine I'll spill, I'm actually a 2-shot follower. Didn't want to give it away but you guys won't leave things alone.
From one shot to two shot, from tracker to follower cause we don't leave things alone?
Man you're scummy as fuck, how can you be left alone? You're the one leaving us alone.
Can we talk reads now?
That's the worst thing you can say, if you're town.
VOTE: Raskolnikov
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 8:25 pm
by Lil Uzi Vert
In post 1565, Titus wrote:Drone said nothing since I subbed in. So he took no stance. I don't ISO for ancient history. He avoided the thread entirely during the wagon.
Titus, this is your case on Drone. The majority of us have tossed it out the window because you kept referring to Day 1 as ancient history. If you can give me another reason on why I should vote Drone, please do.
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 8:27 pm
by Lil Uzi Vert
Drone, how does your vote on end up on Rask there?
