Mafiascum.net

I actually don't even remember, it was probably the way he handled his read on me

that Brigitte is the only player i'm really getting positive feedback here from... and i'm voting her.
no matter which thing it is i must be doing something wrong.

I can be negative if you prefer.

In post 1821, Chara wrote:

In post 1818, skitter30 wrote:so i guess for me with chara if they're town i think it'll click eventually so i guess i'm kinda just waiting to see when/if that'll happen

if you have the time for it, i'd love if you read one of my very recent scumgames. it's okay if you don't like cold meta, though.

you could link it and if i have time i'll look at it, but no promises since things are kinda busy this week
i look at cold meta as more of a secondary source of forming reads, so like i'll use it to try to supplemant what i'm thinking but i don't *base* reads on it usually

UNVOTE:
this might be dumb to do but i'm just going to make sure i'm not overlooking a bunch of things here and being less lazy.

pedit: i wonder if i should just treat Brigitte like Elsa.

In post 1829, Chara wrote:UNVOTE:
this might be dumb to do but i'm just going to make sure i'm not overlooking a bunch of things here and being less lazy.

pedit: i wonder if i should just treat Brigitte like Elsa.

I feel like I should be insulted by this.....who is Elsa?

don't be insulted. Elsa trolls and is hard to read because of it is basically the point. but i can sometimes of tell what he's going for so maybe i should be trying harder with you.

In post 1828, skitter30 wrote:you could link it and if i have time i'll look at it, but no promises since things are kinda busy this week

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=77288

most recent one if you want it. it's fine if you don't have the time/can't get anything out of it.
i think it's me doing something wrong here since it's multiple players, and i'm townreading them.

i think that Flubber's reads are rather controversial, that he's genuinely frustrated, and that even though his thought process isn't entirely transparent to me with his conclusions i'm still not seeing where the scum part is. weird isn't scum.

In post 1831, Chara wrote:don't be insulted. Elsa trolls and is hard to read because of it is basically the point. but i can sometimes

sort

of tell what he's going for so maybe i should be trying harder with you.

I mean I troll, but I don't think I am hard to read here. I guess looking at the vote count that doesn't really matchup with reality or w/e.

I am in a weird funk with this game and don't have scumreads so I think its harder to see where my motivations are lately because I really have no clue what I am doing anymore with my biggest scumread gone and even the other ones I was making just disappearing. I have no scumreads and I know I probably being pocketed but i kind of refuse to recheck my townreads at this point of the game for paranoia.

So I am left in void of motivation to do anything and the few slots unsorted I could just lynch and if scum, cool! If not maybe will give me motivation to start reaccessing.

@Brigitte Why is your vote still on the tictac slot?

Oh, I didn't see your most recent post.

In post 1833, Chara wrote:i think that Flubber's reads are rather controversial, that he's genuinely frustrated, and that even though his thought process isn't entirely transparent to me with his conclusions i'm still not seeing where the scum part is. weird isn't scum.

This is like 99% people fighting back and forth in high volume, coming to their own conclusion, and having the reasoning peppered in it all. So if I make a single post summarizing someone's play, it gets lost in the shuffle.

And yes, it is insanely frustrating, and probabaly why my reads are "controversial" too.

In post 1751, Nimueh wrote:@NMSA, You can read us as both scummy without linking us, you know.

That's what I've been doing.

my dog has suddenly taken a turn for the worse out of nowhere so if i have to put her down tomorrow im not gonna be in a great headspace for a bit.

I've agonized over this for a while, and usually I'm really against replacing out, but I think it's just bad for me to try to play with a person that refuses to engage with me whatsoever.

well

ok

I'll just wait on the new slots to get caught up and see who joins the enter slot I guess

In post 1840, Enter wrote:I've agonized over this for a while, and usually I'm really against replacing out, but I think it's just bad for me to try to play with a person that refuses to engage with me whatsoever.

@mod please replace me

Please reconsider. I really don’t want you to replace out.

In post 1844, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1840, Enter wrote:I've agonized over this for a while, and usually I'm really against replacing out, but I think it's just bad for me to try to play with a person that refuses to engage with me whatsoever.

@mod please replace me

Please reconsider. I really don’t want you to replace out.

Look, I’d rather replace out than you. if there’s no other way. Please don’t do this. :/

In post 1845, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1844, Nimueh wrote:

In post 1840, Enter wrote:I've agonized over this for a while, and usually I'm really against replacing out, but I think it's just bad for me to try to play with a person that refuses to engage with me whatsoever.

@mod please replace me

Please reconsider. I really don’t want you to replace out.

Look, I’d rather replace out than you. if there’s no other way. Please don’t do this. :/

I honestly would rather be mislynched than have anyone replace out over me. I really was sick, now that I’m feeling a bit better, I think you should give this another chance.

In post 1754, Chara wrote:i don't love the vote either. obviously i don't know you but i'm agreeing with Ank that you look more like town than scum and skitter's case on you just seems to be gut based about you seeming flat.
it just doesn't feel right. especially with both me and Ankamius giving reasons for you to be town that skitter doesn't seem to have engaged with.

Ankamius is one of the few people who can read me correctly and yeah, I don’t understand why she’s not taking either yours or Ank’s cases into account.

In post 1756, Chara wrote:

In post 1751, Nimueh wrote:@NMSA, You can read us as both scummy without linking us, you know.

In post 1752, Brigitte wrote:That is what he has been saying...

i mean... yes. i don't get what your issue is, Nim. nmsa never said you're scum together because of a link, he just said he was reading you both as scum.

He said I was bussing Brigitte.

I apologize. I would feel much worse for asking to replace out and then saying "nevermind," than I would just replacing out.