Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2019 2:46 am
The Kop wagon supports at least one of [A50, Datisi, LUV] being scum.
The Kop wagon supports at least one of [A50, Datisi, LUV] being scum.
And the Emp wagon implies at least one scum in [Luca, Datisi, me]
Did you ever post what this was?In post 1156, Datisi wrote:Mhm, I'm starting to reconsider it too. Especially since I've noticed something that is either 9000 IQ scum!Luca play or genuine Town. Or maybe I'm just being an idiot.
If this truly was a slip or not is less important now, since I don't think Luca's scum. But would be nice if I were right on that.In post 1131, Luca Blight wrote:@ Datisi: I’ve only skimmed the recent pages, but it’s just a feeling I got from your interaction with Icon. I will try and review it later.
You’re a player that has divided opinion, therefore it would naturally be an informative Lynch. Mine would be also for the same reason, but the difference is that you have claimed VT and I haven’t(claimed VT), and I feel like I’ve done nothing to warrant being lynched on D1, but then perhaps I’m biased on that.
Yeah, sure, lemme just reread parts of D2 real quick. Can I ask you the same (if you ever gave a read on me) and to explain this?In post 1783, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:No because I don’t think that’s why they were killed. This wasn’t an obvious night kill so scum either killed them because they thought they were PR,to protect a partner, or to frame a townie. Alisae was playing really aggressive and loudly for scum to think she was a PR so I’m much more confident in the last two.
Why? You were so confident in A50/Datisi. From Town!Klick pov, what does it matter which one of us gets lynched first? In 1820 you said it doesn't feel right. In 1823 you're already back on the A50/Datisi train. But why not lynch A50, when others have already said they're willing to do so?In post 1824, Klick wrote:I kinda want to lynch Datisi today.
If you think anything I say or do will help you're far off base. Both Tchill & Icon have decided I should be lynched and there's no way to change that. ANYTHING I say or do will be seen as a scum move by me. Suppose I suddenly decided to effort. "That's scum him trying to get out of the nooze". Suppose I stayed the way I am. "That's scum him giving up". There is no way I'm getting out of this, and even if I somehow managed to escape the lynch today I am the designated lynch tomorrow. Too much trouble for no gain at all.In post 1835, Luca Blight wrote:If you are Town then I’ll be really disappointed. I can understand feeling out of sync in a game, but if you’re not even going to try then what’s the point? You’re just letting the rest of us down, as there is no way to really distinguish whether you scum who has given up or Town who is not bothered. There is so much info now and the game is there for the taking, and here you are saying ‘Lynch me as I’m out of sync’? I’m sorry but that is pathetic.
Apologies if I portrayed a large amount of confidence, I didn't mean to when I said this:In post 1836, Datisi wrote:You were so confident in A50/Datisi. From Town!Klick pov, what does it matter which one of us gets lynched first?
In post 1799, Klick wrote:Is it A50/Datisi then?
1823 doesn't do anything to express I'm 'back on the A50/Datisi train'. Show me where you got that impression.
Because I'm starting to think he could be town.But why not lynch A50, when others have already said they're willing to do so?
Way to shift the goalpost - I don't think anyone has specifically agreed to that. I'm here to lynch scum regardless of how active/helpful anyone here is.Pretty much everyone's agreed to bet the game that there's at least one scum in A50/LUV. Why not go through lynching them first then?
OK. fair enough. I sincerely apologize for defending you and I promise not to do that ever again.In post 1841, Tchill13 wrote:All you've done is complain that you don't know what's going on or complain that you can't do anything at this point.
And you went out of your way to call me someone that's mislynched early all the time and provided one game of evidence.
You decided to call someone out on that and then play like this in the same game?
In post 1842, Klick wrote:1823 doesn't do anything to express I'm 'back on the A50/Datisi train'. Show me where you got that impression.
You said you don't think it's Tchill/LUV/you, and Icon's referred to as what he claims. That leaves me, A50 and Luca.In post 1823, Klick wrote:I'm going back to the eternal question: what scumteam actually decides to kill Alisae over Icon last night?
Knowing what we know now, scum probably don't have much power themselvesconsidering all we have is Loyal Mailman.They could probably reasonably assume town didn't have much power. I don't think the immediate assumption is that we have a protective with a Cop claim.
Datisi/A50 both noticed and reacted to the claim. Luca claims to have noticed but didn't give any indication of that until D2 (but tbf I do think he noticed - I think he's the type to have read through the whole thread as either alignment). LUV didn't acknowledge the claim yesterday. Tchill actively claims to have not seen it.
But then Alisae's strong townreads wereTchill/LUV/myself. I really don't think they choose to kill her.
People wanna lynch him, mind explaining why?In post 1842, Klick wrote:Because I'm starting to think he could be town.But why not lynch A50, when others have already said they're willing to do so?
By my readslist and what I wrote I think to be the team, I thought it was obvious that this was a rhetorical question.In post 1842, Klick wrote:Way to shift the goalpost - I don't think anyone has specifically agreed to that. I'm here to lynch scum regardless of how active/helpful anyone here is.Pretty much everyone's agreed to bet the game that there's at least one scum in A50/LUV. Why not go through lynching them first then?
I'm also amused by the fact that you throw this out and then immediately go against it by voting me.
Who does this post help?In post 1844, Almost50 wrote:OK. fair enough. I sincerely apologize for defending you and I promise not to do that ever again.In post 1841, Tchill13 wrote:All you've done is complain that you don't know what's going on or complain that you can't do anything at this point.
And you went out of your way to call me someone that's mislynched early all the time and provided one game of evidence.
You decided to call someone out on that and then play like this in the same game?