Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2019 1:46 pm
oops
I don't have to out anything. L8's slot alignment is completely independent of mine and completely independent of the quality of my read on you.In post 1826, Gentleman 5 wrote:P-Edit: Then you better out your reason that L8 is town beyond a doubt.
Whoa okay G6 you have quite that strong a read on G5?In post 1824, Gentleman 6 wrote:In post 1823, Gentleman 6 wrote:L4, if I leave the dance (proof that I'm town) can you leave the dance after?
In your perspective, is losing 3 townies for 1 scum optimal.In post 1827, Gentleman 6 wrote:L4, if I leave the dance (proof that I'm town) can you leave the dance after?
It's significantly more optimal than not really having any way to get you lynched because everyone's townreading you for no reason.In post 1832, Gentleman 5 wrote:In your perspective, is losing 3 townies for 1 scum optimal.
Id actually wouldnt mind if L4 takes that deal if L5 flips town.
I think youre town but L8 isnt.In post 1828, Gentleman 6 wrote:I don't have to out anything. L8's slot alignment is completely independent of mine and completely independent of the quality of my read on you.In post 1826, Gentleman 5 wrote:P-Edit: Then you better out your reason that L8 is town beyond a doubt.
You're trying to hide behind shading a slot that's not even mine to discredit my read on you.
I'm stepping out for just a but - will you be around in maybe half an hour?In post 1831, Gentleman 4 wrote:I understand; Thank you, Lady 2. Her ISO straight (while I will admit I skimmed at least part of it) doesn't look as solid on her read of Lady 5 as I remembered - I can definitely see where you're coming from now. I'm not really sure how this affects my read on her, but I'll keep it in mind and it does hold weight.
Do you have time to talk about the game with me for a bit?
I don't know that anyone has explicitly said they're town reading Gentleman 5, trying to make the argument that no one is willing to lynch him while we're not yet out of Pre-Dance (and threatening to kill other players in the process) is preposterous and absurd.In post 1833, Gentleman 6 wrote:It's significantly more optimal than not really having any way to get you lynched because everyone's townreading you for no reason.In post 1832, Gentleman 5 wrote:In your perspective, is losing 3 townies for 1 scum optimal.
Id actually wouldnt mind if L4 takes that deal if L5 flips town.
Yes.In post 1837, Lady 2 wrote:I'm stepping out for just a but - will you be around in maybe half an hour?In post 1831, Gentleman 4 wrote:I understand; Thank you, Lady 2. Her ISO straight (while I will admit I skimmed at least part of it) doesn't look as solid on her read of Lady 5 as I remembered - I can definitely see where you're coming from now. I'm not really sure how this affects my read on her, but I'll keep it in mind and it does hold weight.
Do you have time to talk about the game with me for a bit?
I really dont want to townhunt today, Ive said that before.In post 1835, Gentleman 6 wrote:Man, I'd really have to just quote his entire ISO because it's a comprehensive read that doesn't hold as much weight unless you look at the entire body of work and the lack of townreads and the amount of shade fired out.
See you then!In post 1839, Gentleman 4 wrote:Yes.In post 1837, Lady 2 wrote:I'm stepping out for just a but - will you be around in maybe half an hour?In post 1831, Gentleman 4 wrote:I understand; Thank you, Lady 2. Her ISO straight (while I will admit I skimmed at least part of it) doesn't look as solid on her read of Lady 5 as I remembered - I can definitely see where you're coming from now. I'm not really sure how this affects my read on her, but I'll keep it in mind and it does hold weight.
Do you have time to talk about the game with me for a bit?
You don't think without quoting his entire ISO you could give me a sample of what you're talking about?In post 1835, Gentleman 6 wrote:Man, I'd really have to just quote his entire ISO because it's a comprehensive read that doesn't hold as much weight unless you look at the entire body of work and the lack of townreads and the amount of shade fired out.
Lady 8 has a man already, so pointing fingers at her currently is contrary to the reason behind scum hunting in the ladies in the first place.In post 1840, Gentleman 5 wrote:I really dont want to townhunt today, Ive said that before.In post 1835, Gentleman 6 wrote:Man, I'd really have to just quote his entire ISO because it's a comprehensive read that doesn't hold as much weight unless you look at the entire body of work and the lack of townreads and the amount of shade fired out.
We can only remove a lady this phase, hence why Ive been focusing L8.
L6 did, L4 did, there might be a couple others idk.In post 1838, Gentleman 4 wrote:I don't know that anyone has explicitly said they're town reading Gentleman 5, trying to make the argument that no one is willing to lynch him while we're not yet out of Pre-Dance (and threatening to kill other players in the process) is preposterous and absurd.In post 1833, Gentleman 6 wrote:It's significantly more optimal than not really having any way to get you lynched because everyone's townreading you for no reason.In post 1832, Gentleman 5 wrote:In your perspective, is losing 3 townies for 1 scum optimal.
Id actually wouldnt mind if L4 takes that deal if L5 flips town.
I mean I’ve been getting some scummy vibes from him too but also Town vibes as well.In post 1811, Gentleman 6 wrote:Yeah like
I'm not... spectacularly sure on L7. She's playing a very scum motivated game. Is it possible that she's town being weird? Sure I guess.
But gentleman 5 is mafia
That I can agree with you there.In post 1812, Gentleman 6 wrote:but like he and L7 have been running around playing interference calling people scummy for objectively towny posting and basically preventing anyone from getting townread.