Page 74 of 92
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 7:37 am
by BananaCucho
You would confirm me as not having the "Sin" trait
I could still be 3p if they dont have that trait
Just wanna point that out before someone else does lol
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 7:38 am
by NorwegianboyEE
So mafia will have to decide whether to kill in clerics or kill Banana if we do that. Either way, i'm liking that as a plan.
...Also they could be mafia that doesn't die when they don't have corruption. But this was about checking Jackel's: "Banana has sin trait" theory anyway.
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 7:38 am
by BananaCucho
Also, as long as I don't die, it'll confirm you guys can remove corruption
If only if only there was a way to prevent myself dying tonight
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 7:39 am
by BananaCucho
RIP Jackelgator meme btw
Baa baa JackelSheep have you any wool
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 7:40 am
by NorwegianboyEE
If Porkens flip scum i think we should just target one of Jackel/Starbuck tho.
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 7:55 am
by BananaCucho
I had a thought about Starbucks claim - if they are scum, they may be telling some truth about one aspect of their role - specifically if they aren't on the wagon at EOD they gain corruption. Could be the opposite, that they actually lose corruption, or could be that by being on the wagon gains them corruption
I just had a thought that their claim actually could make sense as a survivor type 3p role, but 3p likely has a night kill so I doubt it a bit
Anyway, if we are going for a vig shot to clear/kill someone, it makes more sense to target Jackel IMO. As long as scum doesn't have a way to pile 2 corruption onto them, they should either be cleared or die (assuming Porkens flips scum so you target them instead of me), and even if scum has a way to throw that much corruption at someone, other people don't receive corruption instead and we can fish that out
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:42 am
by redtea
Jackel if Porkens flips maf, sure.
How do you feel about D&D if town though?
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:48 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 174, Porkens wrote: In post 18, androgybee wrote:This is a hard claim.
Everyone in this game has the following post restriction,
must be said using the following code. Otherwise we will automatically lower your corruption level at night. Please do not make me hurt you I would be very sad if I did.
Code: Select all
[color=#8080BF][b]Corruption[/b][/color]
~Bee
So the fakeclaim was that if we don’t format corruption in that way, our corruption level goes
VOTE: down and RR was
avoiding
that. And that is townread why?
This might be the most town-indicative thing from Porkens tho.
UNVOTE:
Like i've gotta consider if scum!Porkens would shade their partner's gambit in that position.
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:51 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 1831, redtea wrote:
Jackel if Porkens flips maf, sure.
How do you feel about D&D if town though?
My read on D/D right now is that if Porkens is town then they are likely scum. I don't think Catboi would be scum with D/D.
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:52 am
by redtea
Don't think I mentioned this because originally Bell asked and I arrived post-flip, so I didn't bother
but not tracking a maf-read (or at least a previous-town but now-suspicious read) D1 is pretty sus.
More defensible if alignment/role cop (if they wanted to check out a town-lean instead), but as tracker? Nah.
Also I don't have them voted anymore VOTE: Porkens
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:53 am
by redtea
Not saying you're wrong there Norwe
but with one maf down, would they not be worth eliminating for the info if nothing else?
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:53 am
by NorwegianboyEE
@Porkens
Do you usually buss your teammates when playing as mafia? What strategies do you employ as scum?
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:55 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In the townblock, D/D has been cruising the most i feel. Catboi has been showing a solving attitude consistently though. And their playstyle gives me more townpings than scumpings.
Like i'm seriously worried about D/D having been scum-coasting most of the game right now.
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:57 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Post
192 is casting doubts on people's TR's on Radical Rat, which seem less partner equity unless they have been planning to buss each other from the start.
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:00 am
by NorwegianboyEE
I re-read day 1 and i'm not sure i wanna wagon porkens anymore.
:/
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:06 am
by BananaCucho
In post 1838, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Post
192 is casting doubts on people's TR's on Radical Rat, which seem less partner equity unless they have been planning to buss each other from the start.
Sure. But I asked Porkens why they didn't follow up on that or actually scum read Bell
Porkens never puts Bells in their scum reads or POE pool or votes them
Just you/DD/Catboi, and votes Bee
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:08 am
by BananaCucho
So a callout that early when nobody (except scum) knows that scum actually want corruption (instead of possibly having a higher threshold) feels TMI to me, and also no follow up or scum read, even townreading Bell before day end
I reward no.townpoints for it
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:11 am
by NorwegianboyEE
@Banana
Who do you think would be a likely teammate to scum!Porkens and scum!D/D respectively?
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:12 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Btw i'm assuming 3 scum and no third party.
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:14 am
by BananaCucho
Not sure. I don't really like doing pre-flip associations tbh, you end up with situations such as Porkens thinking you/Joey are a team, then a continued death tunnel on you for 2 weeks
I'm more interested in who could be teammates with Bell
Btw I'm willing to listen to any arguments considering DD. I did say I wanted to go ISO them, but I keep getting distracted with other things that come to thought lol
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:19 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Eh ok.
That's the thing though, they were really not seriously pushed by anyone, and somehow they kept being left out of the discussion. So it's really hard to pinpoint exactly who'd be scum from their flip since we didn't really wagon them, we just got a lucky lolshot in on them.
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:24 am
by BananaCucho
lmao and what a lucky shot. Bell was in prime position to waltz into the end
Who brought up that Bell basically avoided Jackel?
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:29 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 1604, catboi wrote:Bell was basically indifferent on porkens/starbuck while barely mentioning jackel. That is probably where we should be looking.
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:30 am
by NorwegianboyEE
VOTE: Jackel98
For the sake of a counterwagon.
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2020 10:30 am
by BananaCucho
I'm good with this
You must know however, that my tin foil hat stuff is buzzing like crazy right now lmao