Mafiascum.net

In post 1810, Looker wrote:What were davesaz's timestamps for?

In post 1810, Looker wrote:VOTE: TiphaineDeath Why focus on the latter half of IKS's wagon instead of the earlier half? Why are we targeting IKS's wagon at all?

In post 1830, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:774 - 777 doesn't look like an S/S interaction though - can you explain how you are reading it as S/S?

In post 1785, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 1773, a2rudeboy wrote:NPOM- is it a deliberate tactic to post 3 or 4 short posts in a row, usually not quoting what you are referring to, in order to screw up any iso reads?

BEF/Pooky- was the dayvig/daydoc serious, or just Bantz?

if BEF is a dayvig then I'm a daydoc

if BEF is not a dayvig then I guess I could still be a daydoc?

In post 1826, davesaz wrote:

In post 1810, Looker wrote:VOTE: TiphaineDeath Why focus on the latter half of IKS's wagon instead of the earlier half? Why are we targeting IKS's wagon at all?

Does the vote go with the comment?

In post 1836, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Kuribo isn't playing this game is he?

In post 1838, a2rudeboy wrote:Lavender- You don't need a reads list. And if it is the same as your last one, it's not worth much anyways.

In post 1734, davesaz wrote:Why would scum bus before a claim, especially when there was a seemingly valid counter to work with?
Possibly more importantly, what do you think about people who switched from NPOM vs. people who hadn't voted NPOM?

My thoughts: any new bussing (if any) is after claim, and probably not the first 1-2 after claim. Pre-claim bussing (if any) should be much earlier in the wagon before it got real, and people who had laid a foundation to not vote NPOM.

In post 1739, Bambi Jay wrote:Decaf is probably good. If I'm scum and we're close to deadline I put more faith in nobody waking up early enough to hammer. She was the only one who posted in those last hours.

No point killing your buddy if you can do a no shred day and literally nobody can call you out for not hammering.

In post 1755, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:

In post 606, DrippingGoofball wrote:That does it.

VOTE: I Keep Siteflaking

In post 738, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 726, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I am not really liking galron.
AlsoVOTE: unvote
I should stop hopping and make an actual contribution.
I don't like Icerint's list because it has a lot of town reads I feel like for this early in the day. pedit Coincidentally, now that I am looking at that list, slot's looker npom are reads I have a hard time with are listed as scum.

VOTE: WaltertheDunce10

In post 823, DrippingGoofball wrote:Just vote Siteflake. You'll immediately feel better.

In post 1385, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1354, Iecerint wrote:NB: If NPOM flips scum, I would be REALLY suspicious of DGB. It's VERY UNUSUAL for her to ignore someone who protects someone for outguessing flavor on D1. Her avoidance of NPOM all day is out of character for her.

Way to make me feel real self-conscious about this, Iecerint!

VOTE: NPOM

In post 1386, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1381, Titus wrote:VOTE: iks

There's a counter. I am ok with him dying.

IKS is scum too.

In post 1388, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1387, Almost50 wrote:

In post 1386, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1381, Titus wrote:VOTE: iks

There's a counter. I am ok with him dying.

IKS is scum too.

If both are scum reads to you, why join the smaller wagon? Asking for a friend.

Iecerint's case was convincing.

I will switch if necessary.

In post 1418, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1401, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I don't intend to claim at all at least not today.

CLAIM STALL DETECTED

VOTE: NPOM

In post 1683, DrippingGoofball wrote:I believe AKS' claim. I don't know if it's scum or town, though. But I am willing to wait and see.

Starbuck is town.

In post 1698, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1696, I Keep Siteflaking wrote:Town mislynching my top townread is simply not happening. Any other questions?

I might have to switch my vote to you for this post.

In post 1704, DrippingGoofball wrote:Here is a list of people that aren't voting for scum NPOM:

BrightEyedFish
TiphaineDeath
Bambi Jay
Titus
Looker
pisskop
davesaz
I Keep Siteflaking
PookyTheMagicalBear
Gamma Emerald
a2rudeboy
Almost50

aka my vig list

In post 1707, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1705, Titus wrote:Why are you defending him?

I just threatened to swing my vote back on him, if I'm defending him I'm not doing a good job.

Goofball seems to vote without a clear thought process. Also lack of quotes makes it hard to tell. Interesting to note while voting for Walter thae reply to someone was vote for iks. The claim stall is a bit weird. Other than that believes npom is scum. Considers to vote iks for that post on refusing to vote for npom. Neutral feeling
I am curious goofball if you believed both were scum why did you believe people who voted for other than npom deserve to be vigged?
pedit Do you mind pointing to where chkflip says that?

In post 1794, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:yup

we got a lot of useful information out of the lynch

I believe in Democracy and the American way. Vigilantism is dangerous.