That is not true though. Examples would be bugs dropping, shelly becoming a townread, redados now giving off town vibes with the sudden defense of me, suspicious of the players giving a townread on Saudade since I do not believe town would have that read, I can kind of buy Mundivores explanation but Plus still has not explained his meta read yet, trying to solve your slot as well since you are trying to push me and now at the moment leaning more towards overeager town but unsure about your scumrange so want to read scumgame
duppin cannot point to specific posts that make him scumread him. after being pressed for an extended period duppin pointed to one post where there was a decent level of engagement with a slot he says he scumreads. one post.
i didn't link to one post? i linked to several and I pointed out that i had interacted with both of the players i called out, you kept saying i couldnt and that i didnt explain any of my reads and so on, i told you that you could just ISO me, you then said I was deflecting and whatnot lol. also this is just a bad read in general since reads dont have to be based on a specific post per say eg UNOwen is pushing on redados not for what he is doing but for what he does not think he is doing. In fact and this is quite ironic it comes across as you pushing on me not for what I have said but for what you believe i havent said. That was obviously just an example, read can also be based on overall tone and whatever and as for redados i clearly pointed out the posts though.
duppin's vote has been parked on a slot who is inactive for irl reasons and has since done almost nothing to solve.
vote has been parked true that is fair criticism but if he had showed up after his v/la then this would never have been an issue, nonetheless you dont have to vote on someone to try to solve their slot, i am definitely trying to solve other slots and have been getting townreads.
duppin is very wishy-washy in reads, and seems capable basically of stating a townread-ish, but cant justify scumreads. that sort of inability to scumhunt is generally a sign that the person is scum, since scum have difficulty scumhunting.
i have justified all of my scumreads, you are free to explain exactly what part of my logic it is that you disagree with if you want to discuss that. I do not think i am very wishy-washy in my reads either, but i am not going to say stuff like someone is 90% scum on day 1 when i can't even bother to ISO them to be honest.
when pressed to produce content and reads, duppin points exclusively to posts he has already made, which suggests that duppin is unable to engage critically with the game and that he is concerned with not contradicting himself. if his scumreads were genuine he would be able to give off-the-cuff reads and be more spontaneous.
not really? I explained my reads to noora when asked and then you asked me about reads that i had previously given and i pointed out that these were already explained so you could just iso them. I don't think there is anything that suggests i am unable to engage critically with the game I also dont see how you conclude that this would mean i would be concered with not contradicting myself, not like it would be difficult for me to just repeat my previous reads.
all of these are things that are not only anti-town and bad, but more than likely come from a scum mindset. theres no genuine scumhunting. if hes town he really needs to step it up, but the way hes been attempting to deflect my pressure suggests that he isnt engaging with me in good faith.
you can complain about my playstyle if you wish to do so, but let's go over it:
first of all as i mentioned when i attempted to push a policy lynch on Jester, there is a big difference between something being anti-town and somethign being scummy. So let's start with anti town, you can argue that me trying to policy lynch Jester based on nothing but the selfvote is anti town in case Jester is town, you can also argue that me keeping my vote on Saudade is anti town in the sense that he is missing so the vote itself is useless as long as he is V/LA. However you have failed to explain why you think my vote on Saudade is scummy and why it is "more likely to come from a scum mindset".
What do you believe my motivation for scum would be to keep my vote parked on him?
As for scumhunting there certainly is. I am not going to do a "lol this guy is 90% scum omg vote why is everyone ignoring me" day 1 no, but if you do not believe I am trying to solve slots then it is what it is, you can be bothered with my playstyle and I can call yours out for being bad as well, difference is i am not convinced yours is coming from a scum perspective.
You claim I am deflecting as I said earlier I will gladly challenge that claim, so please point out where you think I am deflecting? I am also baffled that you keep claiming that I have not been engaging you when I have acknowledged and responded to every single question.
and then theres the fact that no one has been willing to move their vote or get on board. if a townie is really really insistent on pressuring another town slot, usually scum are willing to hop on the wagon and see where it goes, because they dont have to lead the wagon and the fight is TvT. since i expressed my scumread on duppin a counterwagon has formed on me, but no one has moved to vote duppin. what does that tell you?
okay this is actually a really bad WIFOM read. First of all it is weird for you to expect scum to immediately jump in on a tvt wagon also it's rather funny how you on one hand are saying it's weird that scum would not jump in on a tvt yet also calling people out for voting on you - or does that read only apply if they side with you?
Also and this is just a general tip, if you want to call out wagons then name names. If you think I am scum, then who do you think my partners are that voted on you? What makes you believe it makes more sense for them to vote on you if they were partners with me rather than just jumping on of the current wagons?