Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:31 am**

Votecount 1.11

Pretentious (5) - NorwegianboyEE, Nero Cain, muh316, Gamma Emerald, TheDuke
NorwegianboyEE (2) - Pretentious, Albert B. Rampage
innocentvillager (2) - DrippingGoofball, NoPowerOverMe
muh316 (1) - Tayl0r Swift
Umlaut (1) - innocentvillager
Glitch (1) - May

Not voting (5) - Non lmh, TheGoldenParadox, Umlaut, Guillotina, Glitch

(expired on 2020-11-29 10:00:00) remain until day end

With 17 players alive, it takes 9 to reach a majority.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:31 am**

In post 1819, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Late wagon Muh vote? Then why do you townread Pretentious?

Because you're scum and desperate to lynch him to end the day before the town starts waking up to all the shit you've really been up to.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:31 am**

In post 1822, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
In post 1820, NorwegianboyEE wrote:And do you townread muh ABR?
Muh is town.

Pretentious also voted Muh.
Why is he town?

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:33 am**

Pretentious voted him without reading BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT HE DOES.

How many times so I have to repeat that his fake hammer is NAI!?

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:34 am**

In post 1828, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Pretentious voted him without reading BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT HE DOES.

How many times so I have to repeat that his fake hammer is NAI!?

So you read him for meta.
Are you familiar with my meta? Why do you townread him for meta while not considering my meta?

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:35 am**

You're DONE in this town. Finished. Forget about leading your lurksack coasting scumbuddies, it's OVER FOR YOU.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:35 am**

In post 1830, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You're DONE in this town. Finished. Forget about leading your lurksack coasting scumbuddies, it's OVER FOR YOU.

You are very boring to talk to.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:36 am**

Fuck your self-meta. You are scum.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:38 am**

Again, why?

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:39 am**

You can keep this up all day. It doesn't make it true.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:39 am**

Trying to end the day without evidence by rushing elim on muh and pretentious.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:41 am**

In post 1835, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Trying to end the day without evidence by rushing elim on muh and pretentious.

If you look at my ISO you can see that i've clearly not rushed the vote on Pretentious, i've given him time to talk, discuss. Opportunities to debate. Now it's gone on for 20 pages, how exactly would i play this out differently if i'm town? Let him talk for 40 pages more?
And why is voting to end the day on an compromise elimination scummy?

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:42 am**

lol @ IV acting like I haven't already been calling him scum.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:43 am**

I'm haveing like a really hard time telling who is scum and who is just really bad town.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:43 am**

20 pages in 24h where we ran in circles, with 9 days left where we can push your lurksack scumbuddies and actually progress our reads.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:44 am**

In post 1838, Nero Cain wrote:I'm haveing like a really hard time telling who is scum and who is just really bad town.

Such as who?

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:45 am**

In post 1839, Albert B. Rampage wrote:20 pages in 24h where we ran in circles, with 9 days left where we can push your lurksack scumbuddies and actually progress our reads.

Is there any reason you seem to believe i have lurksack scumbuddies?
Because it seems brought up out of nowhere just like many of your previous points.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:46 am**

Call it a working theory.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:47 am**

In post 1837, Nero Cain wrote:lol @ IV acting like I haven't already been calling him scum.

i know you have, that's why it's funny lol

Nero Cain wrote:I'm haveing like a really hard time telling who is scum and who is just really bad town.

I'm not scum, so i must be really bad town

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:47 am**

It's very tiring to debate ABR because he consistently brings up theories that are presented as conclusive evidence, and just the fact that you're arguing against him means he can argue that you implicitly agree to his flawed premise just by entertaining and humoring the thought.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:49 am**

In post 1844, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It's very tiring to debate ABR because he consistently brings up theories that are presented as conclusive evidence, and just the fact that you're arguing against him means he can argue that you implicitly agree to his flawed premise just by entertaining and humoring the thought.

it's ok norway! i will whiteknight and defend you from the mean abr!

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:50 am**

In post 1845, innocentvillager wrote:
In post 1844, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It's very tiring to debate ABR because he consistently brings up theories that are presented as conclusive evidence, and just the fact that you're arguing against him means he can argue that you implicitly agree to his flawed premise just by entertaining and humoring the thought.
it's ok norway! i will whiteknight and defend you from the mean abr!

Is that sarcasm? I can defend myself just fine.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:50 am**

Your pushes have not been beneficial to town and people are starting to catch on.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:51 am**

not really sarcasm, more just lighthearted fun

im here for fun

f u n

and i do TR both of you so

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2020 3:52 am**

In post 1847, Albert B. Rampage wrote:people are starting to catch on.

Again, just you saying something doesn't make it true?
Anyway i'll stop feeding into your arguments now because we're just going in circles and it's not productive.

Mafiascum.net

Large Normal 230 - Game Over