Mafiascum.net

In post 1814, Blade Dancer wrote:Ircher (5): Netflix and Chill, Bell, Polar Bear Express, Dr Easy Bake

Hmmmmm we have a double-voter.

In post 1273, Double the Trouble wrote:

In post 1234, pichu wrote:

In post 1227, Double the Trouble wrote:i may be town because I'm 100% not in my scum meta and I'm displaying more blue traits then red
but NOT YOU MISSY, If you don't keep scumreading me and being paranoid of me I will not feed the polar bears fish for a week

what's the meta difference?

Oh this
Scum!Ali is a bit more agenda heavy and pushes their agenda through, and is generally a bit more controlling
Town!Ali is way more passive

scum Ali here then, as Dunnstral points out.

In post 1282, Solstice wrote:i think the BM case has solid reasoning

i also think it is not correct

~mist

eh? run that past me again? you're half right anyway

In post 1297, pichu wrote:VOTE: Ircher just in case it's a hammer
ok back here
VOTE: Double Trouble

can u 2 go back to voting me?[/quote]

Alisae scum here surely...?

page 52 - belated wagon on Ircher because he suspected Ydrasse. Comes a bit out of nowhere but grows quickly. If he ever flips scum, defo scum in the page 52 crew.

In post 1328, Double the Trouble wrote:

In post 1319, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:so after consulting for a long time with my ace team of mason friends we have come up with this POE-4;

we will eliminate someone from this list today:

Double Trouble
Ircher
Battle Mage
Dunnstral

Pls don't put anyone within 2 votes of being elim'd I'd like to do some final heart-heart talk with the victim first thanks!

honestly I feel like you should be able to recognize that this is my town game :/

nice AtE

In post 1369, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 1340, Spiffeh wrote:Out of this list of four BattleMage is the one I'd want eliminated the most

Dunnstral and Ircher I would fight against and Double the Trouble I'd need to be thoroughly convinced

Well Battlemage hasn't really done anything yet, so it would be more of a shot in the dark, in my opinion

Double Trouble comes off looking pretty bad, in my opinion, and is a good sanity elim

townpoints for Dunnstral. I still increasingly like Spiffeh even though he wants me dead.

In post 1374, Netflix and Chill wrote:I support Double/Ircher eliminations.

I would compromise on Battle Mage, but wouldn't really be happy about it unless it flipped scum.

I don't think Dunn is scum.

I jive ok with these reads - showing some genuine progression.

In post 1381, Creature wrote:Been barely having time for this game and tomorrow will probably be even worse

So far unhappy with the current gamestate

odd to see Creature popping up again to complain about gamestate when they haven't been doing much themselves.

In post 1826, Battle Mage wrote:page 52 - belated wagon on Ircher because he suspected Ydrasse. Comes a bit out of nowhere but grows quickly. If he ever flips scum, defo scum in the page 52 crew.

why is scum in that page if ircher is scum

In post 1387, Netflix and Chill wrote:This is a weird surge of effort coming from Creature. Considering he's not in the pool of potential lynches, I'm inclined to think it's town?

what effort??

In post 1390, Dunnstral wrote:Why are you reading from the first page, now?

this was in relation to Creature. A valid question, never answered.

In post 1400, Bell wrote:e-3 give or take 1.

this attempt to give Ircher wagon a new lease of life. doesn't vibe well if Ircher-town.

In post 1828, Not Known 15 wrote:

In post 1826, Battle Mage wrote:page 52 - belated wagon on Ircher because he suspected Ydrasse. Comes a bit out of nowhere but grows quickly. If he ever flips scum, defo scum in the page 52 crew.

why is scum in that page if ircher is scum

The pace the wagon grew based on nothing new happening, suggests to me at least 1 scum getting their distancing chips in early, just in case.

PS: get an avi dude....

In post 1821, Battle Mage wrote:in my limited experience of Alisae...this strikes me as odd.

what limited experience?
You don't know my experiences with DEB.

In post 1826, Battle Mage wrote:scum Ali here then, as Dunnstral points out.

passive does not mean not spam post and I'm not sure how that conclusion is being driven but also you haven't even encountered a scum!Ali so how the fuck would you know the difference between the two?

In post 1830, Battle Mage wrote:
PS: get an avi dude....

Er... You of all players here shouldn't say that.

In post 1776, Battle Mage wrote:I think Norwee-Alisae is probably scum. Hard to believe 2 such capable players, 1 of whom has lots of experience with me, would both be scumreading me here.

have you read ur own title?
You come across as the kind of player that would try to soft something for towncred.

Also mastina is very convincing tbh its quite unusual.

In post 1446, Not Known 15 wrote:VOTE: Double the Trouble
I have played with Norwegianboy in the past.
This isn't town. This is scum drowning the thread with distracting and spammy posts.

this came a bit out of nowhere, and i didn't even realise you existed in the first 50 pages.

In post 1448, Double the Trouble wrote:Show me these spammy posts?

- Norwee

pfft lol

In post 1485, Toogeloo wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Ircher
His quote text walls are full of IioA. They are looking busy, but it's super fluffy.

I'm not a huge fan of having to come back to 27 pages that are mostly shit posts by players like pichu and the hydras. It demotivates me (and possibly others) to read everything we missed and try and sieve through for actual substance.

My experiences with Creaturescum remind me of the fat kid in dodgeball. I don't think he's someone Flav would actually "choose" to recruit for his scum team.

Toogeloo-san giving me all those townfeels again.

In post 1541, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 1319, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:so after consulting for a long time with my ace team of mason friends we have come up with this POE-4;

we will eliminate someone from this list today:

Double Trouble
Ircher
Battle Mage
Dunnstral

Pls don't put anyone within 2 votes of being elim'd I'd like to do some final heart-heart talk with the victim first thanks!

In post 1539, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:btw I am very happy with how the POE-4 is going - you guys are all doing a great job

if you aren't voting for someone in the POE-4 you should do so and have a reason preferably.

every1 already voting in the POE-4 pls give me your top SR and top TR in the POE-4 with reasons thanks.

DT
BM
Dunn
Ircher

I think. Ali isn't hyperposting and controlling stuff, Ircher has weird reads.

not the best take on Alisae in my book.

my real time thoughts are:

Not me
Not Dunnstral
Ircher only if we had to, but on balance he's still pretty neutral for me.
DT - happily, although there's probably relatively low-content + high ability people I'd rather elim

In post 1835, Battle Mage wrote:pfft lol

That's what I thought too, but Norwee didn't spam at all(all their posts have to do with reads and such). It's Alisae who's the culprit there.

In post 1834, Double the Trouble wrote:

In post 1776, Battle Mage wrote:I think Norwee-Alisae is probably scum. Hard to believe 2 such capable players, 1 of whom has lots of experience with me, would both be scumreading me here.

have you read ur own title?
You come across as the kind of player that would try to soft something for towncred.

Also mastina is very convincing tbh its quite unusual.

sorry, i should introduce myself:

Hi Alisae, I'm Battle Mage.

My title is from like 2010 - when I used to get mis-elimmed all the time.

I had a 10 year hiatus.

Since returning at the start of 2020, I have only been mis-elimmed once, and have not been mis-elimmed in my last 34 consecutive completed games (although that may be about to end here of course haha!)

if you're claiming to find mastina convincing when I've already debunked her case on me, I think we're going to struggle to have productive conversations.

In post 1833, Not Known 15 wrote:

In post 1830, Battle Mage wrote:
PS: get an avi dude....

Er... You of all players here shouldn't say that.

i was joking dude, but also it is confusing having another no avi player

In post 1837, Battle Mage wrote:My title is from like 2010 - when I used to get mis-elimmed all the time.

oh
maybe I misjudged

still though, I don't see why I would trust my own ability to read when when I can trust norwee and mastina

I thought the title came from your scumplay not because you were mis-elim'd a lot
I shoulda done my research

In post 1832, Double the Trouble wrote:

In post 1826, Battle Mage wrote:scum Ali here then, as Dunnstral points out.

passive does not mean not spam post and I'm not sure how that conclusion is being driven but also you haven't even encountered a scum!Ali so how the fuck would you know the difference between the two?

lol no need for the over-defensiveness dude - as I said in the original quote, I observed that using Dunnstral's assessment of your meta, you're playing to your scum meta here. It's nothing to do with my meta on you.

In post 1838, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1833, Not Known 15 wrote:

In post 1830, Battle Mage wrote:
PS: get an avi dude....

Er... You of all players here shouldn't say that.

i was joking dude, but also it is confusing having another no avi player

have u met cerberus v666
he used to not have an avatar a lot.
tbh im used to it and I think not having an avatar has its own style to it so I respect it.

In post 1811, Double the Trouble wrote:And I think it was possible that mastina could have been bussing battle mage, and I was going to take steps to find that out
But now I can’t because now its known that I thought it could be a possibility
Thank you norwee

Ey no problem buddy.
Just give me a call if you want me to spill more of your secrets again.

- Norwee

In post 1841, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1832, Double the Trouble wrote:

In post 1826, Battle Mage wrote:scum Ali here then, as Dunnstral points out.

passive does not mean not spam post and I'm not sure how that conclusion is being driven but also you haven't even encountered a scum!Ali so how the fuck would you know the difference between the two?

lol no need for the over-defensiveness dude - as I said in the original quote, I observed that using Dunnstral's assessment of your meta, you're playing to your scum meta here. It's nothing to do with my meta on you.

and how would you know that

You know what? I think I want Double the Trouble dead today.
1) BM softed pr. theres a big possibility he'll be cleared/guiltied overnight and we'll be set and fine tomorrow without the risk of mislimmed a pr day 1. There really is no rush and if he's softing pr, we shouldn't be risking mislimming a pr. The activity argument is kind of damning but I've been criticized of not posting enough in town games before so idk how much weight I wanna put in it. I believe Mastina is passionate and believes in this read but I am not that convinced and I think theres plenty of time to sort this slot and maybe his night action can clear him, etc.
2) Double looks terrible. Each head has thrown shade and then the moment someone criticizes, the other heads like "eyyooo I don't agree with it so alls good"
3) Ircher wagon is dying and he is STILL one of my main SRs
4) Dunn is not happening today and
hold up I gtg.

In post 1839, Double the Trouble wrote:

In post 1837, Battle Mage wrote:My title is from like 2010 - when I used to get mis-elimmed all the time.

oh
maybe I misjudged

still though, I don't see why I would trust my own ability to read when when I can trust norwee and mastina

this is my 3rd game with mastina this year.

in all 3 games, she decided i was scum at the beginning and did little else other than tunnel me for the duration.

In 1 game I was scum, in the other 2 town (incl. this one).

I don't consider her read on me to be genuine, it's just what mastina does. Hence as I said to Norwee, I don't think it's scummy for her as she does it consistently as town. But it's also not something one should put any stock in.

Norwee has played several games with me. I think it's fair to say his record of reading me is pretty hit and miss.

In post 1844, Double the Trouble wrote:

In post 1841, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1832, Double the Trouble wrote:

In post 1826, Battle Mage wrote:scum Ali here then, as Dunnstral points out.

passive does not mean not spam post and I'm not sure how that conclusion is being driven but also you haven't even encountered a scum!Ali so how the fuck would you know the difference between the two?

lol no need for the over-defensiveness dude - as I said in the original quote, I observed that using Dunnstral's assessment of your meta, you're playing to your scum meta here. It's nothing to do with my meta on you.

and how would you know that

haha i wouldnt! I merely made an observation based on Dunnstral's assessment.

Can I ask why you're challenging me on the validity of Dunnstral's meta, rather than challenging him? or alternatively, can you show me where you did challenge him?

In post 1846, Battle Mage wrote:Norwee has played several games with me. I think it's fair to say his record of reading me is pretty hit and miss.

I can see that but ik norwee is town and its honestly better than nothing. Also I would feel bad if I couldn't trust my partner.
I also just generally don't really like ur softing.

In post 1845, Polar Bear Express wrote:You know what? I think I want Double the Trouble dead today.

Is this Gloria or Noraa?