Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2021 12:29 am
Why did I check the thread before sleeping D:
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
LQ or Shrek based on the type of slot you're saying you targeted.In post 1822, DrippingGoofball wrote:Guess who is widely town read, but is in fact Scummy McScummerson?
Also I'm confused how you know thisIn post 1822, DrippingGoofball wrote:My action was successful but
In post 1818, KittyTacky wrote:T3 was a push by town as far as I can read it. He self-destructed is all. Any scum on the wagon just followed along.
Straight from the mod.In post 1828, Dwlee99 wrote:Also I'm confused how you know thisIn post 1822, DrippingGoofball wrote:My action was successful but
That sounds like something scum would say.In post 1830, KittyTacky wrote:And yeah, just tell us who, there are several widely-townread slots. Ambiguity helps nobody here, the mafia knows you're likely an investigative anyways now.
Wanting the town to get more unambiguous info is scummy?In post 1832, DrippingGoofball wrote:That sounds like something scum would say.In post 1830, KittyTacky wrote:And yeah, just tell us who, there are several widely-townread slots. Ambiguity helps nobody here, the mafia knows you're likely an investigative anyways now.
Okay either there was a mod mistake, DGB omitted part of its role name, or DGB is straight up faking it. I'll refrain from voting it just now in case it's the first butIn post 1833, Dwlee99 wrote:Are you also a checker? That isn't how NRG works on loyal.
What does this mean?Dwlee99 wrote:Kitty -- on 1835
I received no acknowledgement of my action, I thought the mod might have made a mistake, so I asked.In post 1833, Dwlee99 wrote:Are you also a checker? That isn't how NRG works on loyal.
How so? DGB accused me, I defended myself. In what way is town getting more info on a result when someone is being shady bad?In post 1838, Dwlee99 wrote:1835 was bad posting
So the mod accidentally spoiled that your action was successful to you?In post 1839, DrippingGoofball wrote:I received no acknowledgement of my action, I thought the mod might have made a mistake, so I asked.In post 1833, Dwlee99 wrote:Are you also a checker? That isn't how NRG works on loyal.
You remind me of scum!MathBlade casting doubt on my cop-guilty result in another game. Are you scum, Dwlee?
Seriously, how am I scum?DrippingGoofball wrote:LOL no surprise, KittyTacky is scum.
I still don't see who you actually targeted. Honestly this reads more like scum getting mad at a botched fakeclaim getting exposed.In post 1844, DrippingGoofball wrote:DIE SCUM DIE
In post 1809, Nero Cain wrote:I mean I guess in a way you could make the argument that if he was scum that fake claim a meta gulity to try to get gamma killed over himself then he wouldn't have withdrawn but gamma was town reading him for meta scum reading and I think that's bunk. I DK about you and std though.
It’s the way he did it that was townyIn post 1810, Nero Cain wrote:Someone remind me to meta scum read someone since it's a town tell
The mod can't tell you if your action succeeded, only if it was received.In post 1839, DrippingGoofball wrote:I received no acknowledgement of my action, I thought the mod might have made a mistake, so I asked.In post 1833, Dwlee99 wrote:Are you also a checker? That isn't how NRG works on loyal.
You remind me of scum!MathBlade casting doubt on my cop-guilty result in another game. Are you scum, Dwlee?
T3 has done this in the past. I have said it but nobody listened to me.In post 1602, Dwlee99 wrote:Stop self-hammering if you're town ffs.
LoL. Very true!In post 1605, Nero Cain wrote:Pretty ez to have correct reads when u know everyone's alignment
Your slot was reading scum. Did you read the day 1 so far?In post 1606, Dwlee99 wrote:I'd say that not reading the context and jumping to conclusions on random stuff is scummy but I see town do it a lot
I agree! But let's jump the guns already! I want to study this day a bit longer!