Mafiascum.net

Why did I check the thread before sleeping D:

In post 1822, DrippingGoofball wrote:Guess who is widely town read, but is in fact Scummy McScummerson?

LQ or Shrek based on the type of slot you're saying you targeted.

Also, I like the pirate addition to the profile pic

DGB I am on the edge of my seat

In post 1822, DrippingGoofball wrote:My action was successful but

Also I'm confused how you know this

Alright I read through D2 posts so far. I think the StD TMI reasoning is too weak to be a reason for a lim. I still think mega is just asking other people to read the game for them both to seem busy and so they have to provide minimal amount of their own thoughts. I'm gonna go through T3 and Norwee's ISOs and see what that turns up.

DGB - any day now on that guilty

And yeah, just tell us who, there are several widely-townread slots. Ambiguity helps nobody here, the mafia knows you're likely an investigative anyways now.

In post 1818, KittyTacky wrote:T3 was a push by town as far as I can read it. He self-destructed is all. Any scum on the wagon just followed along.

In post 1828, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1822, DrippingGoofball wrote:My action was successful but

Also I'm confused how you know this

Straight from the mod.

In post 1830, KittyTacky wrote:And yeah, just tell us who, there are several widely-townread slots. Ambiguity helps nobody here, the mafia knows you're likely an investigative anyways now.

That sounds like something scum would say.

Are you also a checker? That isn't how NRG works on loyal.

NAR*

In post 1832, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1830, KittyTacky wrote:And yeah, just tell us who, there are several widely-townread slots. Ambiguity helps nobody here, the mafia knows you're likely an investigative anyways now.

That sounds like something scum would say.

Wanting the town to get more unambiguous info is scummy?

Kitty -- on 1835

In post 1833, Dwlee99 wrote:Are you also a checker? That isn't how NRG works on loyal.

Okay either there was a mod mistake, DGB omitted part of its role name, or DGB is straight up faking it. I'll refrain from voting it just now in case it's the first but

Dwlee99 wrote:Kitty -- on 1835

What does this mean?

1835 was bad posting

In post 1833, Dwlee99 wrote:Are you also a checker? That isn't how NRG works on loyal.

I received no acknowledgement of my action, I thought the mod might have made a mistake, so I asked.

You remind me of scum!MathBlade casting doubt on my cop-guilty result in another game. Are you scum, Dwlee?

In post 1838, Dwlee99 wrote:1835 was bad posting

How so? DGB accused me, I defended myself. In what way is town getting more info on a result when someone is being shady bad?

LOL no surprise, KittyTacky is scum.

In post 1839, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1833, Dwlee99 wrote:Are you also a checker? That isn't how NRG works on loyal.

I received no acknowledgement of my action, I thought the mod might have made a mistake, so I asked.

You remind me of scum!MathBlade casting doubt on my cop-guilty result in another game. Are you scum, Dwlee?

So the mod accidentally spoiled that your action was successful to you?

DrippingGoofball wrote:LOL no surprise, KittyTacky is scum.

Seriously, how am I scum?

I'm not the one claiming investigative and then being shifty about my results. I don't see any town motivation in doing that.

DIE SCUM DIE

In post 1844, DrippingGoofball wrote:DIE SCUM DIE

I still don't see who you actually targeted. Honestly this reads more like scum getting mad at a botched fakeclaim getting exposed.
VOTE: DGB

In post 1809, Nero Cain wrote:I mean I guess in a way you could make the argument that if he was scum that fake claim a meta gulity to try to get gamma killed over himself then he wouldn't have withdrawn but gamma was town reading him for meta scum reading and I think that's bunk. I DK about you and std though.

In post 1810, Nero Cain wrote:Someone remind me to meta scum read someone since it's a town tell

It’s the way he did it that was towny
He seemed to legitimately believe he had some smoking gun on me.

DGB’s play rn seems logical
And I also think it might be Shrek who is the guilty

In post 1839, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1833, Dwlee99 wrote:Are you also a checker? That isn't how NRG works on loyal.

I received no acknowledgement of my action, I thought the mod might have made a mistake, so I asked.

You remind me of scum!MathBlade casting doubt on my cop-guilty result in another game. Are you scum, Dwlee?

The mod can't tell you if your action succeeded, only if it was received.

I'm not "casting doubt" I'm getting clarification because the way you described it is not how it works. If you knew your action succeeded it goes to a hard guilty instead of a soft guilty (cause the action could have been roleblocked)

In post 1602, Dwlee99 wrote:Stop self-hammering if you're town ffs.

T3 has done this in the past. I have said it but nobody listened to me.

In post 1605, Nero Cain wrote:Pretty ez to have correct reads when u know everyone's alignment

LoL. Very true!

In post 1606, Dwlee99 wrote:I'd say that not reading the context and jumping to conclusions on random stuff is scummy but I see town do it a lot

Your slot was reading scum. Did you read the day 1 so far?

In post 1608, Save The Dragons wrote:VOTE: gamma

I agree! But let's jump the guns already! I want to study this day a bit longer!