Mafiascum.net

After all that effort to refine my read last night, I don't even get a hello.

- looks at playerlist
- looks at what i have to read
oh dear god

Don't bother Saki. It's just all fluff, trust me I read it

In post 1852, Mutleyddmc wrote:Don't bother Saki. It's just all fluff, trust me I read it

I think I'm going to /suicide.
-V

I will go and place my vote now.

VOTE: Rach Marie

*Considers going back to scumreading ftl*
*Decides not to because then he'd have to kick someone off his perfect scumteam*

Saki? Spammy? We've seen worse.



-MS

In post 1844, Faster Than Light wrote:

In post 1843, TiphaineDeath wrote:hi, I've been moving in to college, will have less time with classes starting again, I still exist though, sorry that looks scummy ftl.

Dude, it's cool.
I've been moving in, taking a GTA practicum, I know no one here, my room-mates (2 of 3 have never lived in America before) just moved in, and I've gone to a couple of parties and never gotten to sleep before 1 AM every morning--and I have to wake up at 7 AM for this class. In the next two weeks, I'm going to be teaching college, taking Graduate courses, and balancing the rest of this shit.
Look how much I've posted.
There are no excuses.

pretty unfair thing to say to be honest

mollie re: bro.

I think there is a massive difference between rw bro and this bro and it's kinda making me nervous about him. if you look at rw bro he vote reasonably early on nacho despite having weak day one reads and in this thread he had much stronger reads but took alot longer to vote.

he was more useful with his vote in rw i think but not cautious because he declared intent to hammer KA fairly early on in the day there too.

too summarize: it looks pretty different to RWBro to me and Im gonna add him as a cautious scumread for it. this may be chalked down to RW being a completely different group of players though, whereas there is more familiarity in this game

^that was a good post

^that wasn't

UNVOTE:

andy as much as i thoroughly enjoyed drunk you, can we chat when you are sober? just pull over on your way to the airport or something, yeah?

rach dearest

I think you may be town but I wanna know what you are doing with your vote cos all I see is "sheeping mollie/Jiffy" in your iso and it scares me

In post 1690, RachMarie wrote:oh look at that, peeps were pushing skull and bam turns out he is replacing out? What is with going after low hanging fruit eh? How about we catch real scum instead?

why are you directing traffic away from the replacement

In post 1858, Mac wrote:mollie re: bro.

I think there is a massive difference between rw bro and this bro and it's kinda making me nervous about him. if you look at rw bro he vote reasonably early on nacho despite having weak day one reads and in this thread he had much stronger reads but took alot longer to vote.

he was more useful with his vote in rw i think but not cautious because he declared intent to hammer KA fairly early on in the day there too.

too summarize: it looks pretty different to RWBro to me and Im gonna add him as a cautious scumread for it. this may be chalked down to RW being a completely different group of players though, whereas there is more familiarity in this game

mollie <3 mac

thank you.

In post 1861, Mac wrote:UNVOTE:

andy as much as i thoroughly enjoyed drunk you, can we chat when you are sober? just pull over on your way to the airport or something, yeah?

IAWTP

In post 1846, Andrius wrote:mollie
i don't understand
you cant play with my heart like this
am i dead to you or am i not dead to you
i am fine either way as MY HEART WILLLLLLLLLL GO ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNN but srs I have a couple cards to play etc so if I go I won't be going silently into that good night etc

anywho
i am drunk again
however i cant be drunk tomorrow as i have to drive us to the airport to pick up mina so maybe there will be reading then?


congrats on college, TD!
METAL SONIC DONT YOU CALL THAT ATE. THATS CALLED BEING DRTUNK

I am not the one who is playing with someone's heart here! I unvoted you and I would like to hear more from you.

you get 1 pass from me with this aTe. if you turn out to be scum you will probably have to deal with my paranoia forever.

Mutt your vote is shit

:L

In post 1864, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:

In post 1858, Mac wrote:mollie re: bro.

I think there is a massive difference between rw bro and this bro and it's kinda making me nervous about him. if you look at rw bro he vote reasonably early on nacho despite having weak day one reads and in this thread he had much stronger reads but took alot longer to vote.

he was more useful with his vote in rw i think but not cautious because he declared intent to hammer KA fairly early on in the day there too.

too summarize: it looks pretty different to RWBro to me and Im gonna add him as a cautious scumread for it. this may be chalked down to RW being a completely different group of players though, whereas there is more familiarity in this game

mollie <3 mac

thank you.

sorry it took so long. how does that compare with what you are thinking?

In post 1866, notscience wrote:Mutt your vote is shit

:L

Your role is shit. Be scum soon please

that deserves a gif^

syryana take honors pls

Where is Syry and CAbd

;-;

In post 1867, Mac wrote:

In post 1864, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:

In post 1858, Mac wrote:mollie re: bro.

I think there is a massive difference between rw bro and this bro and it's kinda making me nervous about him. if you look at rw bro he vote reasonably early on nacho despite having weak day one reads and in this thread he had much stronger reads but took alot longer to vote.

he was more useful with his vote in rw i think but not cautious because he declared intent to hammer KA fairly early on in the day there too.

too summarize: it looks pretty different to RWBro to me and Im gonna add him as a cautious scumread for it. this may be chalked down to RW being a completely different group of players though, whereas there is more familiarity in this game

mollie <3 mac

thank you.

sorry it took so long. how does that compare with what you are thinking?

it is different but I see where you are coming from. he is firm in my sure possibly scummy pile then.

Okay, I'm back. Sleep schedule is now officially adjusted for college.

I know a player who drunk posts a lot on my off site and I've found it to be more scummy the more it's done. Almost an excuse to post often and get words in that you more or less can't take seriously. Because how do you type accurately when you're truly drunk? One, you shouldn't even be playing mafia at that point, but two, truly drunk people are rarely that coherent.

Unfortunately, it seems that my second choice has lost at least half the voice pushing that wagon. Mutt, calling the first 75 pages fluff is rather unintelligible. Realistically, it's anything but fluff. This game is getting out of focus, and we need to start drawing a consensus here now. Cases have become less prevalent, and the last few pages are mostly spam. Just take Mutley's and NS' recent interaction for example. We need to avoid this unintelligible garbage which isn't even close to scum hunting.

B&B, do you still believe Andrius is the right lynch, or are you willing to test the theory mastin and I have on Rach? I still think the Rach lynch gives us the most reward for the lowest risk. Or at least you have to assure me you'll look into Rachscum/Malascum tomorrow for me.

GiF and I don't want to lynch Rach today.

Rach is town, sorry we're not gonna lynch her.