Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 6:18 pm
I was doing important shit yesterday for 30 minutes.
Let's do wayne tomorrow
Vote BRO today
Let's do wayne tomorrow
Vote BRO today
I was doing important shit yesterday for 30 minutes.
Go back and look at pie's post.In post 1849, zMuffinMan wrote:you seem fine with itmorph wrote:I'm the one in this hydra who hates policy lynches. Me. ffery.
i don't actually see what's so wrong with his recent posts that warrants a last-minute policy lynchmorph wrote:Are you thinking that Wayne's pulling a last minute crazy thing to keep BRO in the game one night?
explain it to me like you think i'm dumb (if you don't already)
noIn post 1850, thenewearth wrote:I was doing important shit yesterday for 30 minutes.
Let's do wayne tomorrow
Vote BRO today
I'm not seeing it as a policy lynch. I want to lynch scum and only scum. I'm seeing it as a scumslip followed by trolling.In post 1849, zMuffinMan wrote:you seem fine with itmorph wrote:I'm the one in this hydra who hates policy lynches. Me. ffery.
It's probably just paranoia, because wayne's slip didn't look intentional and it looked like he didn't even get what the fuzz was about at first. It seems suicidal to win condition to risk another team member to draw the lynch instead. And I can't really imagine a scum PR so valuable as to make losing probably 2/3 of the team by day 2 worth it.i don't actually see what's so wrong with his recent posts that warrants a last-minute policy lynchmorph wrote:Are you thinking that Wayne's pulling a last minute crazy thing to keep BRO in the game one night?
explain it to me like you think i'm dumb (if you don't already)
i did. it's the sort of thing i probably would have skipped over or not bothered correcting so i don't see the issuemorph wrote:Go back and look at pie's post
have youmorph wrote:I think wayne is scum here that fumbled his claim
what does this even mean?ghost wrote:*Saying he claimed Night 2 infinite shot Watcher after Varsoon claimed superdoc. This wouldn't have been a hard thing to check as either alignment, but he doubles down on what can only seem like a lie. I'm saying Town would of been more likely to not be glib.
he wasn't counter-claiming? did i miss something here?gp wrote:*The 'oh, oh, it was maybe a gambit' walk back. If you're going to counterclaim BRO, counterclaim BRO; don't do both claim it was a gambit and then seemingly want BRO lynched.
what does this even mean?ghosty wrote:*Partially setup spec: if it's potentially fatal to claim a role in this game, such a thing might be symmetrical.
what does this even mean?ghostly pingu wrote:*Wayne's role oddly has more reason to draw Var's attention and considering the timing of both posts..
Just think of me as K at the World FairIn post 1867, zMuffinMan wrote:why are you trying to get lynched
Why would I fakeclaim flavor-cop over a more powerful or more common role?In post 1766, Ghostly Penguin wrote:The shitty thing about this is BRO is pretty fucking clever and unless he's been asleep the last fucking Day, he could figure out that that'd be a pretty safe role claim.
lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIn post 1782, pieguyn wrote:no
I mean responding to how you claimed watcher, but then didn't correct me when I said you're cop.
is no one seeing how wayne blatantly lied
Hawt.In post 1784, borkjerfkin wrote:/in?In post 1781, Ghostly Penguin wrote:spank my ass until it's blue, call me Sally, and tie me up for kinky fun times'
In post 1822, zMuffinMan wrote:he claimed a fucking flavour cop in a game where flavour claiming is not a good idea. how is that a town role?
Where does it say that it's objectively bad? All I see is that there's a risk to flavor claiming (ie, that itIn post 2, borkjerfkin wrote:>>>Important: There are eyes and ears everywhere. Flavor Claim at your own risk in this game.<<<
Would there be an anti-scummy to nom this for if this were the case?In post 1826, pieguyn wrote:wayne, BRO, TNE scumteam of the year 2013?
Why would he do that when he can lurk the pressure away?In post 1835, pieguyn wrote:TNE get the fuck in here and post something
In post 1849, zMuffinMan wrote:i don't actually see what's so wrong with his recent posts that warrants a last-minute policy lynch
explain it to me like you think i'm dumb (if you don't already)
Reading's hard, let's deathtunnel on a shit case because I'm incapable of forming reads or being a dynamic player.In post 1782, pieguyn wrote:no
I mean responding to how you claimed watcher, but then didn't correct me when I said you're cop.
is no one seeing how wayne blatantly lied
"Let me flagrantly ignore the fact that my scumreads should work in some vaguely-constructed narrative as a mechanism to get pressure off me."In post 1850, thenewearth wrote:I was doing important shit yesterday for 30 minutes.
Let's do wayne tomorrow
Vote BRO today