Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 9:35 am
(expired on 2015-12-30 14:30:00)
(Wed Dec 30 @ 2:30:00 PM ET)
(Wed Dec 30 @ 2:30:00 PM ET)
Page 75 of 138
(Wed Dec 30 @ 2:30:00 PM ET)
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 9:43 am
Mod I think Pistachion and Heat need some prods 
hopefully we can replace Pistachion this time!
/No Offense Pista but Your inactivity is not what we need atm
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 9:46 am
↑ Frozen Angel wrote:Mod I think Pistachion and Heat need some prods
hopefully we can replace Pistachion this time!
/No Offense Pista but Your inactivity is not what we need atm
The day isn't even 72 hours old yet. No prods until 72 hours into a day phase
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 9:49 am
ok we w8...
we w8...Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 10:10 am
I know something you don't titus. At least I think I do..
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 10:28 am
↑ Dwlee99 wrote:In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/X.php?p=7481317#p7481317]post 1793[/url], Davsto wrote:I have a scumread on pistach as well. Apparently I'm scum because I don't explicitly state every single one of my reads I get from a big post. The post took a while to make, surprisingly enough, and pistach wasn't one I remembered that much because I was really fucking tired.
Also, what is this post? Because I'm not townreading him, I get a snarky comment and a dirty look?In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=7479430#p7479430]post 1698[/url], Dwlee99 wrote:Oh, I'm not town, dave?
If you dont town read town you are scum.the dirty look and snarcky comment are for added effect
IIRC there was that one post that bugged me a little, enough for it to stand out to me to quote it. I can't get a decent townread from you.In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=7481942#p7481942]post 1842[/url], Dwlee99 wrote:^ he lists reasons I am town in his wall in the spoiler but doesnt conclude I am town ~~
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 10:37 am
↑ Davsto wrote:↑ Dwlee99 wrote:In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/X.php?p=7481317#p7481317]post 1793[/url], Davsto wrote:I have a scumread on pistach as well. Apparently I'm scum because I don't explicitly state every single one of my reads I get from a big post. The post took a while to make, surprisingly enough, and pistach wasn't one I remembered that much because I was really fucking tired.
Also, what is this post? Because I'm not townreading him, I get a snarky comment and a dirty look?In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=7479430#p7479430]post 1698[/url], Dwlee99 wrote:Oh, I'm not town, dave?
If you dont town read town you are scum.the dirty look and snarcky comment are for added effect
IIRC there was that one post that bugged me a little, enough for it to stand out to me to quote it. I can't get a decent townread from you.In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=7481942#p7481942]post 1842[/url], Dwlee99 wrote:^ he lists reasons I am town in his wall in the spoiler but doesnt conclude I am town ~~
Mhmmm totes.
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 10:59 am
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 11:22 am
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 11:24 am
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 12:11 pm
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 12:21 pm
Then I can be content not knowing for now. If we get townblock large enough for near certain victory, I will want you to say.
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 12:33 pm
Okay
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 12:34 pm
Oh to be clear, you don't have any sort of guilty on Dave correct?
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 12:40 pm
@mod V/LA through Sunday. Busy holiday weekend, sorry guys.
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 12:52 pm
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 4:49 pm
Why are people treating Titus as conf town when she is quite clearly uncomfortable. Wanting to lead a town is not townie for a player that likes being in control like Titus does. In fact if anything her insistence has me on edge, if she feels the need to force it, then she is feeling like it is important for her to win, which means that she feels pressure, which given the current situation only makes sense if she is scum.
Vote: Titus
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 5:05 pm
Hahahaha
The second sentence is a walking contradiction. :-p
The second sentence is a walking contradiction. :-p
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 6:06 pm
Elyse wrote:My 1v1 has nothing to do with AJ.
Also you're calling me scum for sticking with it but saying I'd look worse if I dropped it soooo lol
I'd say that both situations make you look pretty bad, and nitpicking this part just makes you look like you're trying to find some fault in drixx's argument. pretty scummy if you ask me
Dwlee99 wrote:I know something you don't titus. At least I think I do..
What was the point of this
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 7:40 pm
Oh my god if I wasn't 1v1ing Titus I would be voting Heat so fast.
That was terrible.
That was terrible.
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2015 8:17 pm
I know Titus said so already but damn. That is a big contradiction.
Jeez I dunno why someone that likes being in control would like to control and lead town.
Your whole argument falls flat cause it is flawed at its core.
Trying to a justify your vote much?
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2015 12:56 am
Tunnel anyone but titus, elyse. Join the dave wagon.
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2015 1:51 am
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2015 4:31 am
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2015 4:50 am