Page 75 of 257
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:36 pm
by Zachstralkita
Varsoon wrote:
In post 1829, Titus wrote:We aren't masons. I fake claimed to save Dunn because he is frankly obvtown but crappy and needs to learn to play with others.
I don't regret it.
Now if there wasn't a double fucking standard regarding claims, I would be dead N1, scum would be lynched and ALL would be sorted.
Yet this group cannot do shit.
Varsoon wrote:
In post 1829, Titus wrote:We aren't masons. I fake claimed to save Dunn because he is frankly obvtown but crappy and needs to learn to play with others.
I don't regret it.
Now if there wasn't a double fucking standard regarding claims, I would be dead N1, scum would be lynched and ALL would be sorted.
Yet this group cannot do shit.
OOOOOH WHAM
BAM
THANK YOU MA'AAAAAM
OOOOOH WHAM
BAM
THANK YOU MA'AAAAAM
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:37 pm
by Wake1
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:37 pm
by Dunnstral
I think we're all town
Even if varsoon annoys me and doesn't read most of the game just to dunnel me
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:38 pm
by Titus
In post 1849, Varsoon wrote: In post 1838, Titus wrote:Dunn I am never reclaiming. This has gone on long enough. We know they are lying to but they will keep up their bullshit claim just to lynch you.
I'm bubbling with delightedness.
And questions!
How did you know Dunnstral would go along with the claim/why did you go along with it?
Do you have a role connection that allowed that leverage/bond so that it wasn't such a test-of-faith?
What do you think of Dunnstral?
Etc
etc
He is shit town.
I wanted us to scumhunt and not waste time on bullshit day one.
Dunn would go along BC he knew I am town.
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:38 pm
by Titus
This literally is the crappiest town group I have seen as town. Ever.
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:39 pm
by Wake1
I don't believe you two are Masons.
I don't believe your counterparts are either.
None of you are safe from the rope!
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:39 pm
by Dunnstral
I was scumhunting.
Wake is town
You're town
Zach is probably town
Transcend probably town
Varsoon is probably town
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:39 pm
by Zachstralkita
Varsoon, I almost let it go with that reaction test but we recovered quite nicely.
Titus wrote:This literally is the crappiest town group I have seen as town. Ever.
And YOU'RE part of it! Yippee!
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:39 pm
by Dunnstral
Wake you serious? He literally slipped like 4 times AND retracted and you still think they're masons?
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:40 pm
by Zachstralkita
Varsoon wrote:Wake, you're going to shoot Dunnstral four times?
Insane.
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:41 pm
by Titus
No. No one but me was and I was labamsted for it. Everyone else was dick measuring.
I rarely gambit but I wanted out and to play to wincon.
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:41 pm
by Dunnstral
Soooooo
can we get serious now
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:42 pm
by Titus
In post 1858, Dunnstral wrote:Wake you serious? He literally slipped like 4 times AND retracted and you still think they're masons?
Enough. Let scum handle it.
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:42 pm
by Dunnstral
Titus what do you think of implosion?
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:43 pm
by Wake1
At an advanced level, I would hate to think two Scum with Daytalkwould devise a plan to look as if they were Town Mason-gambitting Day 1 only to sow chaos and confusion and eventually end on a recant back to average non-cleared suspicion.
Time will answer that.
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:44 pm
by Airick10
Okay I read through about the first 8 pages and then started to black out. I'm now reading from 67 on up and trying to get back on track here. Mass chaos....
So I see Titus's fake claim. And also noted Zach's retraction on post 1684.
Exactly how am I to believe that your retraction was fake?
I assume Dunn is not a Mason, Dunn...care to confirm that? But from what I see from Varsoon, he is still claiming mason. Varsoon, am I wrong?
Still catching up
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:44 pm
by Wake1
In post 1858, Dunnstral wrote:Wake you serious? He literally slipped like 4 times AND retracted and you still think they're masons?
Review
1855.
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:45 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 1865, Airick10 wrote:Okay I read through about the first 8 pages and then started to black out. I'm now reading from 67 on up and trying to get back on track here. Mass chaos....
So I see Titus's fake claim. And also noted Zach's retraction on post 1684.
Exactly how am I to believe that your retraction was fake?
I assume Dunn is not a Mason, Dunn...care to confirm that? But from what I see from Varsoon, he is still claiming mason. Varsoon, am I wrong?
Still catching up
I recommend just not paying attention to any of the mason stuff in your read-through
No I'm not a mason
No, Varsoon/zach aren't either
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:46 pm
by Varsoon
To be fair, Titus, I did set you up for all'a dat.
Although this does bring me back to why you were chainsawing Dunnstral in the first place.
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:46 pm
by Dunnstral
Ok Wake
What are your post-mason reads, and who do you think deserves pressure? (Obviously lurkers but who's scummy aside from that)
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:49 pm
by Titus
In post 1868, Varsoon wrote:To be fair, Titus, I did set you up for all'a dat.
Although this does bring me back to why you were chainsawing Dunnstral in the first place.
Misrep. Dunn is town. I had to sort people going after him. That's not chainsawing.
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:52 pm
by Wake1
I need more wildfire.
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:52 pm
by Zachstralkita
See I knew something was fishy about that. Oh well.
VOTE: implosion
Time to get some real work done.
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 4:53 pm
by Dunnstral
WHY IS IMPLOSION MAFIA
Like I'd seriously consider voting him if somebody could actually give a case
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 5:02 pm
by Titus
Dunn/Zach you have between 650 to 800 posts between you, can you both cool it?