Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2017 6:40 am
This kinda sucks cuz I was just getting into the game
In post 1846, havingfitz wrote:Reading comprehension fail on my part. Disregard my question/s to CK.In post 1835, Ramcius wrote:he listed 5 names, why you asked just about me? And since you didn't understood, he was sarcastic over LoX claim
22 minutes. You gonna vote Vifam?In post 1853, CommKnight wrote:In post 1846, havingfitz wrote:Reading comprehension fail on my part. Disregard my question/s to CK.In post 1835, Ramcius wrote:he listed 5 names, why you asked just about me? And since you didn't understood, he was sarcastic over LoX claim
Also Ramcius read it right too. So Vifam and Ramcius can read what I'm saying.
Which brings back to the question, why were you looking at Ramcius in general? I listed Vifam on it too whom claimed VT and Tywin....
You responding to my questions is why you became a TR after I had originally SR you. I assume you just didn't see my OP so didn't know, but I like that you've responded to everything asked of you thus far, so I take your name off the quoted list.In post 1825, PeregrineV wrote:Shitty reaction to a wagon on him.In post 1753, Tywin Lannister wrote:Hey look, the second person to actually acknowledge this fact. I was the first, and yet I still never got responses from people like Vifam, PereginV, Nero, and to a smaller extend Havingfitz (although fitz atleast said "gut" as a reason). I asked them all why they joined the wagon, what their reasons for their naked sheep votes were, and what case/specific part of the case they agree with/are sheeping. No response. It was just ignored completely. The only one to even acknowledge what I posted (aside from Havingfitz) was Kyouko, who interestingly was the person who all these people sheeped in the first place.
Playing hangman to show he doesn't care if he's lynched.
Getting mad the wagon on him didn't evaporate faster.
Getting mad when being called out on bad play.
Etc.
Nope, you gonna vote LoX?In post 1854, PeregrineV wrote:22 minutes. You gonna vote Vifam?In post 1853, CommKnight wrote:In post 1846, havingfitz wrote:Reading comprehension fail on my part. Disregard my question/s to CK.In post 1835, Ramcius wrote:he listed 5 names, why you asked just about me? And since you didn't understood, he was sarcastic over LoX claim
Also Ramcius read it right too. So Vifam and Ramcius can read what I'm saying.
Which brings back to the question, why were you looking at Ramcius in general? I listed Vifam on it too whom claimed VT and Tywin....
Hell no. You can rolecop her for juicy goodness.In post 1856, CommKnight wrote:Nope, you gonna vote LoX?In post 1854, PeregrineV wrote:22 minutes. You gonna vote Vifam?In post 1853, CommKnight wrote:In post 1846, havingfitz wrote:Reading comprehension fail on my part. Disregard my question/s to CK.In post 1835, Ramcius wrote:he listed 5 names, why you asked just about me? And since you didn't understood, he was sarcastic over LoX claim
Also Ramcius read it right too. So Vifam and Ramcius can read what I'm saying.
Which brings back to the question, why were you looking at Ramcius in general? I listed Vifam on it too whom claimed VT and Tywin....
Any other reads besides one of me/LoX being scum? Other SRs? TRs? Anything else to add?In post 1852, Vifam wrote:Although it's kinda my fault for not being more active but w/e
In post 1864, D3f3nd3r wrote:I'm awaiting a clarification on someone's action, the day will begin once I receive that clarification.