this is to Jingle. i'm so good at readable posting.In post 1847, Chara wrote:why would town Bujaber have that reaction? he's not actually reading himself. that sort of lack of self-awareness is something i find towny, personally.
So thats what you meant then?In post 1842, Chara wrote:scummy:
NicoRobin
TPFKAP
Thor665
Malakittens
Gamma Emerald
northsidegal
players i doubt are scum: Rational, Chickadee, Jingle, McMenno, Flicker
paranoia pile: Toogeloo, Cheeky, BuJaber?, Nancy Drew Shogunate
special tier: Elsa Jay
it would be nice if all or most of the scum were in the pile that's left.
oh. i'm sorry, i don't really remember. if Yoshi said i was then i was, he had no reason to lie, if he didn't say i was specifically then i probably wasn't.In post 1851, CheekyTeeky wrote:Team Mafia - Yoshi scumread me and I assumed you were helping him.
In post 1850, Chara wrote:come to think of it i haven't actually read nsg for alignment. i've just been agreeing or disagreeing with things said about her. sorry nsg, i'll actually look at you now.
In post 247, northsidegal wrote:i think flicker is scum for a very underwhelming opening and a lack of content where i would expect content to be. 63 is essentially RVS at a point beyond when real reads could already have begun to form. she has to be asked specifically about reads by tw before saying anything, and even then i don't think there's much. a lot of the rest of what she's had has been simple straightforward explanations (inherently NAI content wise) or just asking people for reads (gets townread a lot more than it probably should).
In post 314, northsidegal wrote:this is where your line of thinking and mine diverged. whereas you didn't see it as a scumtell, i saw it as a minor one (after checking flicker's previous games).In post 309, the worst wrote:is this a blanket scumtell esp. on an inexperienced player? imo no, it's a newbtell and not a scumtell. ergo I prodded her to produce actual content on how she's reading the game rather than RVSing ( again newer players love rvs)
In post 1047, northsidegal wrote:I can say right now thatevery singlepost Flicker made -today- was either IIOA (in the strict sense of the acronym) or pretty much entirely empty questioning. Look through her ISO if you don't believe me.
Yeah I’m kinda boredIn post 1843, Chara wrote:actually there is really no reason Jingle couldn't be scum, but he gets to be there because charisma and i'm too tired to think more about it. maybe in 2 game days or so.
Gamma's being boring, which in my experience means he's a) bored, or b) not town.
In post 1860, northsidegal wrote:1. i don't think that's a very good reason to be scumreading me.
2. i haven't gone through and made some team-mafia-esque massive wallcase on her, no. i literally cannot remember the last time i did that for a scumreadexceptin team mafia. i just don't really do it that often, so i'm not sure why it's something that you expect from town me. that's not to say that i haven't given reasons for why i scumread flicker - i certainly have:In post 247, northsidegal wrote:i think flicker is scum for a very underwhelming opening and a lack of content where i would expect content to be. 63 is essentially RVS at a point beyond when real reads could already have begun to form. she has to be asked specifically about reads by tw before saying anything, and even then i don't think there's much. a lot of the rest of what she's had has been simple straightforward explanations (inherently NAI content wise) or just asking people for reads (gets townread a lot more than it probably should).In post 314, northsidegal wrote:this is where your line of thinking and mine diverged. whereas you didn't see it as a scumtell, i saw it as a minor one (after checking flicker's previous games).In post 309, the worst wrote:is this a blanket scumtell esp. on an inexperienced player? imo no, it's a newbtell and not a scumtell. ergo I prodded her to produce actual content on how she's reading the game rather than RVSing ( again newer players love rvs)In post 1047, northsidegal wrote:I can say right now thatevery singlepost Flicker made -today- was either IIOA (in the strict sense of the acronym) or pretty much entirely empty questioning. Look through her ISO if you don't believe me.
In post 1040, CheekyTeeky wrote:NSG can you case flicker please?
So why didn't you say you don't do cases much anymore rather than go to the length you did explain why casing her was a bad idea at that point in time?In post 1045, northsidegal wrote:Here's the thing: do you think we're far enough into the day that:In post 1040, CheekyTeeky wrote:NSG can you case flicker please?
1) Flicker has enough content that anything I say couldn't be explained away by it just being early in the day
2) A case I make is actually likely to make progress towards getting Flicker lynched and not just having random votes on and off the wagon?
These aren't rhetorical questions, they're just completely serious questions. Part of the reason why sometimes I guess I don't do much is because I very much so like to give things time so that people can produce enough content where either their newer content makes me rethink my read from their earlier posting, or they have enough posts such that anything I bring up is actually meaningful and won't just be overlooked as an artifact of it being early on in the game.
