7. Artemiana
6. Ircher - mostly lack of presence and a really bad ISO from JJH.
VOTE: Ircher
Perhaps there is a misinterpretation issue.
To me, only this segment is what I consider your PoE, which implies process of elimination list. The entire list I would just call it your readlist.
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 10:53 am
by Thestatusquo
Also, I didn't get your soft bingle and neither I think did morph so its possible that you weren't softing as well as you thought you were.
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 10:53 am
by morph the cat
In post 1850, Guillotina wrote:If everyone starts with 5 HP by default, then I would assume that STD was targeted by scum.
This is categorically untrue, but also seems an off the cuff town thing to assume.
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 10:53 am
by morph the cat
In post 1852, Thestatusquo wrote:Also, I didn't get your soft bingle and neither I think did morph so its possible that you weren't softing as well as you thought you were.
We thought he was softing bulletproof.
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 10:54 am
by unwnd
Adding new clarification, this is reflected in the OP now as well.
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 10:55 am
by Thestatusquo
I thought there were a couple things it could have been. IC wasn't on that list.
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 10:55 am
by Something_Smart
In post 1853, morph the cat wrote:This is categorically untrue, but also seems an off the cuff town thing to assume.
Well if it was a real assumption then it's either town or an impressive scumslip.
Seems like a pretty plausible dumbtell attempt to me, though.
In post 1850, Guillotina wrote:If everyone starts with 5 HP by default, then I would assume that STD was targeted by scum.
This is categorically untrue, but also seems an off the cuff town thing to assume.
Do you think townies would just target someone to harm them without any information whatsoever during N0?
I meant "starts with 5 HP exactly"
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 10:58 am
by Titus
In post 1778, Farkran wrote:pedit: wrt titus, yes shea's point is really good and i'm still undecided what to do with titus. I think she could be scum, but she's also a player who talks a lot and will be sorted at some point no matter what
I tried to push my wagons. I got shot down. So now, I am just following any good wagon.
Anya's still coasting.
Ircher's still not here.
Arte is still MIA after only defending themselves and shading me mostly.
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 10:59 am
by Thestatusquo
What was "the thing" and why hasn't it happened yet.
In post 1778, Farkran wrote:pedit: wrt titus, yes shea's point is really good and i'm still undecided what to do with titus. I think she could be scum, but she's also a player who talks a lot and will be sorted at some point no matter what
I tried to push my wagons. I got shot down. So now, I am just following any good wagon.
Anya's still coasting.
Ircher's still not here.
Arte is still MIA after only defending themselves and shading me mostly.
In what way was N_M a good wagon by whatever definition you would prefer to use to justify it?
In post 1778, Farkran wrote:pedit: wrt titus, yes shea's point is really good and i'm still undecided what to do with titus. I think she could be scum, but she's also a player who talks a lot and will be sorted at some point no matter what
I tried to push my wagons. I got shot down. So now, I am just following any good wagon.
Anya's still coasting.
Ircher's still not here.
Arte is still MIA after only defending themselves and shading me mostly.
In what way was N_M a good wagon by whatever definition you would prefer to use to justify it?
It wasn't. It wasn't a wagon on town, so I was literally jumping on anything that wasn't a townread. I'd rather eliminate an unknown mechanic possibility than town.
I'm at work and taking screenshots and uploading to imgur is hard to do while at work.
you tease.
It's just a PETAchart, don't get too hyped.
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 11:04 am
by Thestatusquo
That justification does not jive with my understanding of how you play as town in literally any way.
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 11:05 am
by Bingle
In post 1856, Thestatusquo wrote:I thought there were a couple things it could have been. IC wasn't on that list.
The point wasn't that I was softing IC, but rather that I was softing a role and thus a higher pocket priority than someone who wasn't softing a role. And I'd wager anyone who was reading the thread realized I was softing
something
.
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 11:05 am
by Titus
In post 1872, Thestatusquo wrote:That justification does not jive with my understanding of how you play as town in literally any way.