Mafiascum.net

In post 632, Ythan wrote:

In post 51, Kazyan wrote:I thought it might be a little scummy to ask a probing question over something that clearly doesn't matter, but then I realized that a "peck" at someone hasn't historically come from scum in my games--Lunar Martian in Mini Normal 2187, or T3's initial questions in Not Quite Normal Multiball. And then you gave a reasonable answer, so now I'm not getting any scum vibes from you.

Don't love this on gut. The town read possible pocket attempt at the end particularly but the back and forth at the beginning and multiple meta citations as well.

In post 633, Ythan wrote:

In post 37, Kazyan wrote:

In post 24, Nathann wrote:

In post 16, Kazyan wrote:VOTE: Kazyan

Why the self-vote?

It's an RVS gag? Weird question.

I think it's a stretch to call that a weird question.

In post 634, Ythan wrote:

In post 46, Kazyan wrote:

In post 36, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 20, geraintm wrote:Oh....this game is going to be weird from what I've read above.

Will post more later.

This is post 20

VOTE: geraintm

This is a good point. geraintm, can you elaborate on "weird"?

Calling this a good point when there's no context seems "weird" but Gramps is already a top suspect of mine. This can be tabled for later.

I feel potentially conf biased and am going to take a break.

In post 651, Ythan wrote:

In post 647, Kazyan wrote:Also, should we consolidate wagons?

On second thought this is actually a weird question.

In post 679, Ythan wrote:

In post 92, Kazyan wrote:I like that we have things to talk about already besides the IC, though I'm still kinda in the phase where I only know anything about Jolyne's role and my role. So, I'm going to watch and reread for a while in order to differentiate people in my mind.

This feels to me like not purely fluff but a subtle suggestion that you are uninformed town. And other than that it is fluff which makes it stand out.

In post 693, Ythan wrote:

In post 691, Nathann wrote:

In post 680, Ythan wrote:I could do Kazyan but I'd rather not do a lurker (Enchant) over him or Gramps d1. I'm judging them on content they posted and that's not likely to change going forward but a lurker will either do something later or be a better target if he's still lurking later imo.

If you're judging them on the content they posted, why do you think it's not gonna change going forward? Your recent posts seem to be going through Kazyan's ISO, and judging by 679, you're still only on 92, which feels like a bit of an early call?

@Dwlee, what changed your mind on me? And on Kazyan, why not.

I mean I'm looking at their content now and tomorrow they'll have more of the same. It's helpful but I think the difference between a lurker as a potential wagon is larger between days 1 and 2 if that makes sense.

In post 1099, Ythan wrote:

In post 117, Kazyan wrote:If we're going to have to actually hunt scum instead of relying on a cop/tracker/whatever to tell us who the bad guys are, I am worried.

Like is this genuine? I'm not in the headspace to judge this right now I just feel confirmation biased looking at the iso.

In post 1744, Ythan wrote:Morning friends.

VOTE: Kazyan