Mafiascum.net

I voted Scorp because I think there's a good chance of him being mafia

I don't actually care if mathblade mislims me this game on d1

it would be preferable for me as opposed to dealing with his shit for as long as I dealt with it last time.

I’ve been saying Nero town forever now.

In post 1802, fua wrote:If Ari is town she would be putting more thought into the game than just tackling low-hanging limbait.

I think I've put a fair amount of thought into this game.

I evaluated the HEM wagon and find the players on it to be mostly townie so I evaluated the game state as town driven wagon on town in a fast moving large implying scum are mostly hanging low and unmotivated to participate.

I asked mb which player on the HEM wagon he found scummy and we could discuss that if that's where he wants to go, his response was "if you won't push someone on the hem wagon then you can go die" which is a nonstarter for me.

I decided to vote for scorp because of all the people who are not posting/participating he is the most egregious example for me.

Dats

1847 just seems kinda townie and lines up with Nero's actions this game. It's not a deep read.

Why can't Ari just be like ya know, scum that ploped down a vote on a somewhat EZ to wagon player in an attempt to save herself b/c you know he's EZ?

In post 1855, Nero Cain wrote:Why can't Ari just be like ya know, scum that ploped down a vote on a somewhat EZ to wagon player in an attempt to save herself b/c you know he's EZ?

You're pulling me around to the idea

do you see anyone voting for scorp?

In post 1855, Nero Cain wrote:Why can't Ari just be like ya know, scum that ploped down a vote on a somewhat EZ to wagon player in an attempt to save herself b/c you know he's EZ?

because no townie in their right mind would go "hey, this person that's being suspected voted a lhf player, let's vote out the lhf player instead!"?

like you keep saying scorp is easy to wagon but I don't see any votes going toward him so I'm not sure how you are making that evaluation besides pulling something straight out of your ass

Scorp is someone who won’t defend himself and as you said, is a low poster/not participating. It’s uncontroversial LHF.

In post 1856, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1855, Nero Cain wrote:Why can't Ari just be like ya know, scum that ploped down a vote on a somewhat EZ to wagon player in an attempt to save herself b/c you know he's EZ?

You're pulling me around to the idea

frogs, please use your fucking brain

ari sees she's getting pressure for "not having reads" and "not voting on the math/monkey wagons"

so her response is to lolvote a lurker and make no attempt to actually address the things that are being asked of her and that she's suspected for??? that doesn't make sense unless coming from the noobiest of scums

and she isn't that

In post 1861, Datisi wrote:

In post 1856, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1855, Nero Cain wrote:Why can't Ari just be like ya know, scum that ploped down a vote on a somewhat EZ to wagon player in an attempt to save herself b/c you know he's EZ?

You're pulling me around to the idea

frogs, please use your fucking brain

ari sees she's getting pressure for "not having reads" and "not voting on the math/monkey wagons"

so her response is to lolvote a lurker and make no attempt to actually address the things that are being asked of her and that she's suspected for??? that doesn't make sense unless coming from the noobiest of scums

and she isn't that

This point has been refuted several times.
If you townread Ari please try a new angle.

In post 1860, fua wrote:Scorp is someone who won’t defend himself and as you said, is a low poster/not participating. It’s uncontroversial LHF.

LHF implies town alignment and I don't really see how you're making that determination.

In post 1862, MathBlade wrote:This point has been refuted several times.

it hasn't been refuted well

I do like being defended tho it is a nice feeling <3

In post 1864, Datisi wrote:

In post 1862, MathBlade wrote:This point has been refuted several times.

it hasn't been refuted well

So then you’re doing the same thing I am doing?
And calling me bad for it?

mathblade when someone disagrees with your opinion they aren't calling you bad.

they just have a different opinion.

In post 1863, Aristeia wrote:

In post 1860, fua wrote:Scorp is someone who won’t defend himself and as you said, is a low poster/not participating. It’s uncontroversial LHF.

LHF implies town alignment and I don't really see how you're making that determination.

Not necessarily, but it’s FoS because I SR you and you’re pushing him.

In post 1863, Aristeia wrote:

In post 1860, fua wrote:Scorp is someone who won’t defend himself and as you said, is a low poster/not participating. It’s uncontroversial LHF.

LHF implies town alignment and I don't really see how you're making that determination.

I disagree, LHF can take on many meanings and they all do NOT implicate town.

In post 1809, fua wrote:Because I don’t think you’re thinking about the game critically and are trying to deflect onto other people when possible. And I’m really not following Nero around, since I completely disagree with his reads on Mathblade, Yeet, and VP.

you TR wu in 257. then Nero shows up and is sus of wu in 283. you say good point in 285 and follow Nero to wu in 292.

nero says I'm a mediator in 898, you say I'm a mediator in 1063

you also TR skitter in 1063. Nero starts wanting a skitter lim in 1325. you SR skitter in 1414.

nero starts getting less interested in wu somewhere around 1370. you switch off wu onto ari in 1623, and say you're hesitant with the wu wagon now on 1791. you did vote ari before him, so credit there.

Nero says there's scum in VP/skitter/yeet in 1506, you say yeet is in your solve in 1658. (you had already leaned scum on yeet earlier, so this isn't a switch of opinion, but you def do not have the opposite read)

Nero says that ari's vote on scorp is bad because she's voting limbait in 1702, you say ari's vote on scorp is bad because she's voting limbait in 1804.

mathblade read is irrelevant because he is claimed mason, so i don't know why you have that as an example of a place where you and Nero differ. the only one that stands is VP. anyway it's not like you're going to agree with him on every single read, so pointing out one where you don't doesn't disprove my point. it's a pattern of general behavior of sheeping after things he says, even down to using the same phrasing that he does

In post 1868, fua wrote:

In post 1863, Aristeia wrote:

In post 1860, fua wrote:Scorp is someone who won’t defend himself and as you said, is a low poster/not participating. It’s uncontroversial LHF.

LHF implies town alignment and I don't really see how you're making that determination.

Not necessarily, but it’s FoS because I SR you and you’re pushing him.

you SR me for pushing him.

you townread him because you SR me.

isn't that just circular logic?

that's a good point about fua

VOTE: fua

In post 1869, Scorpious wrote:

In post 1863, Aristeia wrote:

In post 1860, fua wrote:Scorp is someone who won’t defend himself and as you said, is a low poster/not participating. It’s uncontroversial LHF.

LHF implies town alignment and I don't really see how you're making that determination.

I disagree, LHF can take on many meanings and they all do NOT implicate town.

are you not town?

In post 1871, Aristeia wrote:

In post 1868, fua wrote:

In post 1863, Aristeia wrote:

In post 1860, fua wrote:Scorp is someone who won’t defend himself and as you said, is a low poster/not participating. It’s uncontroversial LHF.

LHF implies town alignment and I don't really see how you're making that determination.

Not necessarily, but it’s FoS because I SR you and you’re pushing him.

you SR me for pushing him.

you townread him because you SR me.

isn't that just circular logic?

Nope.