Mafiascum.net

okay i was 100% expecting that so im not sure why i asked

what was bad about it and why is that one vote enough to make you townread fire

Catboi is lazy camping on their. Dwlee's vote is pretty meh. Kittens is on there despite not posting. Frogster hasn't even really explained why fire is scum.

It's a dumpster fire of a wagon.

Meh, looked at strange's iso and kind of think she's town now actually. Still haven't actually looked at andres's content.

dwlee’s vote seems fine and i think their reaction to frog pushing them early was towny

hi catboi do i know you or am i thinking of someone with a coincidentally similar name

In post 1850, Mistyx wrote:okay i was 100% expecting that so im not sure why i asked

what was bad about it and why is that one vote enough to make you townread fire

The votes are not why I townread fire.

The reason fire is getting voted is because of Luke's play, which sure, fine. But also, fire is asking questions and has takes on the game that are

Someone, I think maybe CSF?, said he is perhaps being slightly reactive, which is probably the best point against him I've seen made. But also, he's getting bagged for shit he didn't have anything to do with or that aren't even really being explained. I've been town in those situations. It sucks and you end up reacting a lot more because you're trying to be a good townie and not get killed. Also, look at fire's town meta. He is well within that range.

I mean, maybe I'm way off base and I'm going to eat shit if fire gets flipped red here, but I feel like I need to intervene here because this wagon has a lot of smoke and mirrors driving it while there are just way better people to wagon today, imo.

Why is that one post you quoted enough to join a serious wagon over?

In post 1854, Mistyx wrote:hi catboi do i know you or am i thinking of someone with a coincidentally similar name

yeah I'm the same person nya

In post 1855, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 1850, Mistyx wrote:okay i was 100% expecting that so im not sure why i asked

what was bad about it and why is that one vote enough to make you townread fire

The votes are not why I townread fire.

The reason fire is getting voted is because of Luke's play, which sure, fine. But also, fire is asking questions and has takes on the game that are

not bad.

Someone, I think maybe CSF?, said he is perhaps being slightly reactive, which is probably the best point against him I've seen made. But also, he's getting bagged for shit he didn't have anything to do with or that aren't even really being explained. I've been town in those situations. It sucks and you end up reacting a lot more because you're trying to be a good townie and not get killed. Also, look at fire's town meta. He is well within that range.

I mean, maybe I'm way off base and I'm going to eat shit if fire gets flipped red here, but I feel like I need to intervene here because this wagon has a lot of smoke and mirrors driving it while there are just way better people to wagon today, imo.

Why is that one post you quoted enough to join a serious wagon over?

am trying to work my way into the game and figured engaging with a major wagon was the way

i had skimmed his iso earlier and hadn’t come away with any strong vibes so

In post 1856, catboi wrote:

In post 1854, Mistyx wrote:hi catboi do i know you or am i thinking of someone with a coincidentally similar name

yeah I'm the same person nya

why didn’t you say hi to me

rude

In post 1858, Mistyx wrote:

In post 1856, catboi wrote:

In post 1854, Mistyx wrote:hi catboi do i know you or am i thinking of someone with a coincidentally similar name

yeah I'm the same person nya

why didn’t you say hi to me

rude

I'm sorry I wasn't around m(*-ω-)m

@vp if you thought Misty's vote was bad/scummy, why vote andres instead of there? misty/MT slot is the 2nd wagon rn. i see you said you wanted to reread MT in 1139 but don't see any further attempts to sort there. i guess she disappeared but still

In post 1857, Mistyx wrote:am trying to work my way into the game and figured engaging with a major wagon was the way

i had skimmed his iso earlier and hadn’t come away with any strong vibes so

A big part of why the slot got voted in the first place was luke's play, which both Bell and I have a fair deal of meta on. If you don't have that background it's not going to make as much sense. fire's posting mostly hasn't shook that impression for me

In post 1860, fireisredsir wrote:@vp if you thought Misty's vote was bad/scummy, why vote andres instead of there? misty/MT slot is the 2nd wagon rn. i see you said you wanted to reread MT in 1139 but don't see any further attempts to sort there. i guess she disappeared but still

I do want to reread MT still. I just didn't have time today because I had so many pages to catch up on. I might go there later, probably will have time to ISO MT tomorrow. For now though, I think andres looks p scummy.

In post 1826, Mistyx wrote:csf can you expand on your bell townread

Generally, he seems to be speaking without much of a filter

I especially liked his reaction dwlee around 1409. I vibed with a lot of what he was saying and it felt natural

In post 1864, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:VOTE: Andres

This is the way

i would say vp/fire probably unaligned

vp part of the reason im confused by it is that you are normally, like, all gung ho about pushing for 2 dueling wagons d1

and me and MT/misty have been the top 2 wagons since 991. misty is at 5 votes and im at 7 rn, i think

so it's kinda weird to me that during that time, you have spent most of it as the only vote on strange, and then now you started a new wagon on andres

pls explain

also im not opposed to the andres wagon and might join it if it picks up, but i am a little paranoid about a vp/misty pairing. and that doesn't really make me want to switch my vote away from misty at the moment

VOTE: andres

ok i'll give this a try

In post 1867, fireisredsir wrote:vp part of the reason im confused by it is that you are normally, like, all gung ho about pushing for 2 dueling wagons d1

and me and MT/misty have been the top 2 wagons since 991. misty is at 5 votes and im at 7 rn, i think

so it's kinda weird to me that during that time, you have spent most of it as the only vote on strange, and then now you started a new wagon on andres

pls explain

I am definitely for dueling wagons D1. I think enough people can see the logic of andres scum to make that a second wagon. I'm not gonna blind vote someone I haven't read the scum case on over someone I think is scummy if we aren't on deadline.

ok good enough for me

BUT CONSIDER MY PARANOIA NOTED

Also, it's fucking wild that andres makes ZERO mention of Praetorian, when almost the first thing andres always does as town is feel out koba. I think Praetorian's play was questionable enough I would think andres would say something about it.

sure ok let's do it

VOTE: andres

In post 1833, Titus wrote:Hmm I think scum might be healing me

In post 1838, Titus wrote:

In post 1835, fireisredsir wrote:

In post 1833, Titus wrote:Hmm I think scum might be healing me

what makes you think that?

I've deliberately done nothing.

Any follow up to this?