Mafiascum.net

I am going to bed.

You invest BCG
Toog invest ???
Pooky invest Toog

I invest Toog BCG or ???

Would prefer clarity on ???

In post 883, schadd_ wrote:

Spoiler:

vote count 1.8 !

Big Chungus Gaming (4):

KittyTacky, PookyTheMagicalBear, Toogeloo, Frogsterking

Save The Dragons (3):

Gamma Emerald, Charloux, Enchant

Frogsterking (3):

Greeting, Big Chungus Gaming, Save The Dragons

Enchant (2):

Cape90, furtiveglance

MalcolmTucker (1):

MariaR

Cape90 (1):

Titus

Toogeloo (1):

marcistar

not voting (1):

MalcolmTucker

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to blow someone up. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-10-12 15:00:00)

modorator notes

• working up the vote count count

In post 1025, schadd_ wrote:

Spoiler:

vote count 1.9 !

Greeting (4):

Frogsterking, Cape90, Titus, PookyTheMagicalBear

Big Chungus Gaming (3):

KittyTacky, Toogeloo, Greeting

MalcolmTucker (2):

Not_Mafia, furtiveglance

Save The Dragons (1):

MariaR

Frogsterking (1):

Save The Dragons

Enchant (1):

Big Chungus Gaming

Toogeloo (1):

marcistar

furtiveglance (1):

Enchant

not voting (1):

MalcolmTucker, Charloux

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to blow someone up. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-10-12 15:00:00)

modorator notes

• e

In post 1150, schadd_ wrote:

Spoiler:

vote count 1.10 !

Alisae (5):

Frogsterking, furtiveglance, Titus, PookyTheMagicalBear, Toogeloo

Frogsterking (3):

Save The Dragons, Big Chungus Gaming, MariaR

Big Chungus Gaming (2):

KittyTacky, Alisae

MalcolmTucker (1):

Not_Mafia

Toogeloo (1):

marcistar

furtiveglance (1):

Enchant

not voting (3):

MalcolmTucker, Charloux, Cape90

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to blow someone up. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-10-12 15:00:00)

modorator notes

• e

You're asking the wrong question imo.
I don't think it's a bad guess that scum preferred Greeting over BcG. If that's your theory, then your eyes should go directly to PookyTheMagicalBear because he shifted off BcG to go to Greeting, effectively killing BcG as a counter.

Even if we suppose that scum preferred eliminating Greeting/Alisae over BcG, that says nothing about BcG's alignment. Scum could want Alisae dead before they shook up the game. BcG could be loud and wrong town. Maybe they want BcG for a miselimination for later.

VCA is too early to get most details.

However, stD and Frogsterking are almost certainly not partners. Like 10% chance.

I agree StD and Frog are likely both town or TVS/SVT

Second paragraph likely false as Greeting wagon became top wagon before Alisae replaced in.

I agree it’s not an absolute but it is enough to get what’s probable.

And the most probable is one (or more) of those wagons is on scum before going to town greeting.

I did some self reflection and I decided that Pooky is scum.

Even if one of the three wagons is scum, there's no specific reason why BcG. My money is StD is the scum wagon.

However, it's day 2 and no mafia flip, so strongly prefer Malcolm. He's basic and never saw Star Wars.

In post 1851, Frogsterking wrote:I did some self reflection and I decided that Pooky is scum.

Why?

In post 1852, Titus wrote:Even if one of the three wagons is scum, there's no specific reason why BcG. My money is StD is the scum wagon.

However, it's day 2 and no mafia flip, so strongly prefer Malcolm. He's basic and never saw Star Wars.

That’s where Alisae and Kitty come in. End of day (or close to it 1.19) they’re both on BGC.

In post 1852, Titus wrote:Even if one of the three wagons is scum, there's no specific reason why BcG. My money is StD is the scum wagon.

However, it's day 2 and no mafia flip, so strongly prefer Malcolm. He's basic and never saw Star Wars.

I prefer spicy elims when we have 4 invests claimed.

Basic = probably town.

In post 1854, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1852, Titus wrote:Even if one of the three wagons is scum, there's no specific reason why BcG. My money is StD is the scum wagon.

However, it's day 2 and no mafia flip, so strongly prefer Malcolm. He's basic and never saw Star Wars.

That’s where Alisae and Kitty come in. End of day (or close to it 1.19) they’re both on BGC.

Given the size of the wagons, two town on one is meaningless.

In post 1856, Titus wrote:

In post 1854, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1852, Titus wrote:Even if one of the three wagons is scum, there's no specific reason why BcG. My money is StD is the scum wagon.

However, it's day 2 and no mafia flip, so strongly prefer Malcolm. He's basic and never saw Star Wars.

That’s where Alisae and Kitty come in. End of day (or close to it 1.19) they’re both on BGC.

Given the size of the wagons, two town on one is meaningless.

No one listens to dead town.

We should break that cycle.

In post 1857, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1856, Titus wrote:

In post 1854, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1852, Titus wrote:Even if one of the three wagons is scum, there's no specific reason why BcG. My money is StD is the scum wagon.

However, it's day 2 and no mafia flip, so strongly prefer Malcolm. He's basic and never saw Star Wars.

That’s where Alisae and Kitty come in. End of day (or close to it 1.19) they’re both on BGC.

Given the size of the wagons, two town on one is meaningless.

No one listens to dead town.

We should break that cycle.

Agreed, but we should do it with more data. Kitty could have been killed for a multitude of reasons.

Right now, we should focus on play. That should likely mean us taking a back seat and seeing what shakes out. I'd want to see what Pooky with the floor.

I also want to watch StD.

I am going to bed.

I really hope you’re not scum here.

But every piece of me thinks you are.

Or maybe I just like old speedsters? Who knows?

I need sleep

In post 1853, Titus wrote:

In post 1851, Frogsterking wrote:I did some self reflection and I decided that Pooky is scum.

Why?

There are a lot of elements of his scum play present and I don't trust he has a town!motivation for claiming when he did.

In post 1860, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1853, Titus wrote:

In post 1851, Frogsterking wrote:I did some self reflection and I decided that Pooky is scum.

Why?

There are a lot of elements of his scum play present and I don't trust he has a town!motivation for claiming when he did.

What's the scum motivation?

In post 1861, Titus wrote:

In post 1860, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1853, Titus wrote:

In post 1851, Frogsterking wrote:I did some self reflection and I decided that Pooky is scum.

Why?

There are a lot of elements of his scum play present and I don't trust he has a town!motivation for claiming when he did.

What's the scum motivation?

Out roles and get pressure off.

In post 1862, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1861, Titus wrote:

In post 1860, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1853, Titus wrote:

In post 1851, Frogsterking wrote:I did some self reflection and I decided that Pooky is scum.

Why?

There are a lot of elements of his scum play present and I don't trust he has a town!motivation for claiming when he did.

What's the scum motivation?

Out roles and get pressure off.

So you're suspecting that town!Pooky never thinks I am crumbing an inno there? Why would scum pooky suggest it then?

In post 1863, Titus wrote:

In post 1862, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1861, Titus wrote:

In post 1860, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1853, Titus wrote:

In post 1851, Frogsterking wrote:I did some self reflection and I decided that Pooky is scum.

Why?

There are a lot of elements of his scum play present and I don't trust he has a town!motivation for claiming when he did.

What's the scum motivation?

Out roles and get pressure off.

So you're suspecting that town!Pooky never thinks I am crumbing an inno there? Why would scum pooky suggest it then?

To get you to talk about your role and reveal who you investigated. I think it was a phishing attempt. I don't know whether or not pooky actually believed that was a crumb.

wtf r u even talking about I literally didnt want to claim my investigation result on titus mathblade is the one who made me actually out what the result was because he thought it would help break the game open

I was just claiming that I thought Titus was inno with no details attached because I thought there was a good chance this game is lots of town investigative roles and no protective PRs

this whole I'm fishing Titus thing is literally random horseshit you decided to pull out of your ass

Why did you investigate me Pooky?

you had few posts and your predecessor slot had few posts and lurked out - theres no heat on you at all.

you are pretty under the radar and I thought a decent chance to be carrying out the nightkill if you were scum

also if im fucking scum trying to "rolefish" titus I would just fake claim Neapolitian or some bullshit and push her as a guilty

softing that I think she's inno without revealing details is because I didn't want to make her a target

I'm going to sleep on this.

I'd love your thoughts on where we should go Pooky.

Like I said, I've thought about it and I believe that Pooky is lying. I don't buy the lurking + AtE + claim.

I don't think you've actually thought about it because your comments make no sense

I suspect you are writing things that are factually inaccurate because you think it's funny to try to tilt someone over the internet

In post 1869, Titus wrote:I'm going to sleep on this.

I'd love your thoughts on where we should go Pooky.

I'm happy to kill anyone on this list:

marci
Enchant
MT
BCG