FFVII Mafia: Over

[CarnCarn]

I don't remember my reasons but -

Nat
Kloud
IAAUN
CD

Interesting list, actually. Please try to remember the reasons and share them.

[Natirasha]

Empking's silence is funny. Also, Empking should claim targets.

[CarnCarn]

Also, Empking should claim targets.

Vote: CarnCarn

I can use my AVALANCHE training to overpower them stopping them from doing any actions.

I don't remember my reasons but -

Nat
Kloud
IAAUN
CD

[Cephrir]

Emp, we've had five nights.

[Empking]

I don't like the CD roleblock because you were roleblocking someone who claimed vanilla under no pressure at all (slipped up, really).
But, with 2 docs dead (and 2 kills last night), a RB would be useful to us if he's town. Emp really hasn't pinged my scumdar at all this game, so I'll have to think more about this whole thing.

Why are you voting me, Emp?

That made it a win-draw situation then. It meant I was unlikely to target a town power role.

I'm voting you because I don't think scum would do what IAAUN did unless you were scum.

[CarnCarn]

First, what Cephrir said.

I'm voting you because I don't think scum would do what IAAUN did unless you were scum.

Saying someone is on another scum team? Why wouldn't scum say that about a protown PR?

Which reminds me that I should claim my action last night, since I've claimed a PR already: I targeted Jebus and it protected him last night (not what I wanted).

That made it a win-draw situation then. It meant I was unlikely to target a town power role.

Bull. How many town PRs are left? All 3 cops (SK, Turk, Shinra) are dead. A Doc and Jailkeeper are dead. If you're willing to believe IAAUN that I'm Shinra, then why didn't you RB me?
The only reason is that you're not town at all. If you're town and you thought I was scum based on what he said, you would have RB'd me. Instead, you're lying scum who thinks I'm opposite mafia and didn't target me because you thought it would stop an NK.

This is the major flaw in the claim, I believe, and it's enough to make me:

Vote: Empking

[Cephrir]

I feel like this lynch is right. Not sure how many votes are on Emp and I don't have time to count, but I don't want to hammer if everyone hasn't given an opinion on him and/or checked in.

[MafiaSSK]

VoteCount

Empking (3)-KaleiDoscope,Natirasha,CarnCarn
CarnCarn (1)-Empking

[Empking]

The fact that people have to come up with BS like me not claiming my targets in order to get me lynched, suggests that this is not a good lynch.

Cephrir: Why does my role break the pattern and not Nat's?

[Cephrir]

His does as well. But at least it makes sense. And it's a backup role, so maybe it's allowed to break the pattern. That's really not the only reason why you're probably scum. Also, you still haven't claimed your fifth target.

[Empking]

But surely it bares mentioning?

I must have either deleted the other target or not sent it.

[CarnCarn]

Night 3: wolframnhart targeted no one.

oh btw, this makes sense with what I said about RBing wolframnhart Night 3, so if you're looking for something to back up my claim, here is something. Not sure if any of my other actions can be confirmed until massclaim, though.

[Cephrir]

Yeah, but we don't know that wolf/K-scope even has an action.

[Yosarian2]

Night 3: wolframnhart targeted no one.

oh btw, this makes sense with what I said about RBing wolframnhart Night 3, so if you're looking for something to back up my claim, here is something. Not sure if any of my other actions can be confirmed until massclaim, though.

(shrug) If nat was lying about my action that night, I would have said so.

Anyway, I don't really see how Nat's investigation made him think EmpKing is scum, since he targeted a guy that didn't die; but it dosn't matter, since EmpKing's roleblocker claim makes him likely to be the other scum roleblocker anyway.

[Natirasha]

Night 3: wolframnhart targeted no one.

oh btw, this makes sense with what I said about RBing wolframnhart Night 3, so if you're looking for something to back up my claim, here is something. Not sure if any of my other actions can be confirmed until massclaim, though.

(shrug) If nat was lying about my action that night, I would have said so.

Anyway, I don't really see how Nat's investigation made him think EmpKing is scum, since he targeted a guy that didn't die; but it dosn't matter, since EmpKing's roleblocker claim makes him like
...Empking targeted christiano drago last night...
...christiano drago died last night...
...Who exactly did he target that was dead?..

[Yosarian2]

Oh, I misunderstood. Ok, then.

Vote:Empking

[Natirasha]

Anyways, that's L-1.

[MafiaSSK]

VoteCount

Empking (3)-KaleiDoscope,Natirasha,CarnCarn,Yosarian2
CarnCarn (1)-Empking

[Cephrir]

Jebus + Grimmy haven't posted since Emp claimed, we probably shouldn't end the day until they check in or something.

[Jebus]

ohi der.

I don't have time to check back at my non-existent notes (aka read up on recent stuff that the mod-limbo period caused), but I'll check in later tomorrow/tuesday. Deadline isn't for a while, I didn't see, so it shouldn't be too big a deal.

[Grimmy]

Got Prod.

Empking seems like a good lynch choice, but I want to read back before hammering. More from me by wednesday the latest.

Grimmy
catching up

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

[]=====

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

=====[]

[Cephrir]

*brandishes hammer impatiently*

[Yosarian2]

[quote="KaleiÃ