Mafiascum.net

the worst case is my list is horribly wrong
you can help me with that

rethink TD.

Where is MS in your list?

MS is in the leaning town pile, I've thought a lot on TD but nothing to him being scum has sold me yet. What are your personal reasons?

In post 1868, fferyllt wrote:

In post 1867, Varsoon wrote:

In post 1866, ² wrote:wrong.

- f

So, then, who is scum?

TMT. Setting aside that horrible waste of a meta dive that Nacho provoked and just looking at his posts in this game, I think AJ is scum. MS is leaning scum for me, but buldermar thinks he's solid scum.

My 4th would be TD.

I'd give Nacho more weight on that one but between him letting me flounder around in old Aj games and having a shit read on us this game, I don't think I'll be weighing his read all that heavily wrt to my own reactions to TD's posts.

- f

the bolded wording of this post sounds weird. like you there are 4 scum. I'm pretty sure I've seen you do it earlier too.

In post 1877, Nachomamma8 wrote:MS is in the leaning town pile, I've thought a lot on TD but nothing to him being scum has sold me yet. What are your personal reasons?

I don't have MS leaning town. He's probably the weakest of my scum reads. buldermar's read is stronger. the observation about 30 pages in 15 minutes was a moment of whoa for me. I am a pretty fast reader, but I can't touch that reading a game thread.

TD's fluff to content ratio is terrible. I think most of post 906 is shit. There was precious little trajectory to the Ghostlin vote. The MS vote was reactive. gut, though, says neither are bussing, so I am either wrong about that or wrong about at least one other read.

In post 1879, ² wrote:I don't have MS leaning town. He's probably the weakest of my scum reads. buldermar's read is stronger. the observation about 30 pages in 15 minutes was a moment of whoa for me. I am a pretty fast reader, but I can't touch that reading a game thread.

He's not reading, but that's pretty normal for him.

In post 1864, ² wrote:

In post 1860, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:

In post 1855, ² wrote:

In post 1834, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:

In post 1804, ² wrote:

In post 1796, TheReverend wrote:Ok it was posh mafia where I played bulder. Here's a thought though... he says I was anti-town in a past game with him, but then goes on to say he can't remember which game it was... how can you remember the details of my performance if you can't even remember which game it was?

I remember nearly none of the names of the games in which I have participated but probably essentially all of the players I have ever played with and at least something about their behavior, and I remember your behavior being inherently anti-town. If I want to make sure that it is indeed a town tell, I'd need to confirm that you were indeed town in the game(s) we played together, but I really can't be bothered.

Also, it's not exactly a detailed description of your performance saying that you were anti-town.

the game you played with him I think was posh and you subbed in for a day and he is

not

an anti-town player. he was my rock in that game even if I couldn't get him to agree to an uber goober lynch.

making up fake meta is another ginormous scumtell btw

Good thing I'm not making up fake meta then, sunshine. You're reading anything I do as scummy no matter what, so please go away and bother someone else.

- b

then go find the game and tell me what rev did that was anti-town. cos he is most definitely NOT what I would call an anti-town player

Do you agree or disagree with the premise that he's playing anti-town this game?

- b

I think he is playing genuinely after subbing into a lengthy game where he does not understand the dynamics <----- not anti-town in my book. YMMV

nor has he played anti-town in the past

In post 1878, Mac wrote:

In post 1868, fferyllt wrote:

In post 1867, Varsoon wrote:

In post 1866, ² wrote:wrong.

- f

So, then, who is scum?

TMT. Setting aside that horrible waste of a meta dive that Nacho provoked and just looking at his posts in this game, I think AJ is scum. MS is leaning scum for me, but buldermar thinks he's solid scum.

My 4th would be TD.

I'd give Nacho more weight on that one but between him letting me flounder around in old Aj games and having a shit read on us this game, I don't think I'll be weighing his read all that heavily wrt to my own reactions to TD's posts.

- f

the bolded wording of this post sounds weird. like you

know

there are 4 scum. I'm pretty sure I've seen you do it earlier too.

Right now I don't have a fifth scum read. I have some nulls. But, 4 scum in a game of 20 players sounds about right to me. Smallest number I have ever seen in a game this size was three scum. Oddly enough, they won. it was a hell of a scum team.

In post 1868, fferyllt wrote:

In post 1867, Varsoon wrote:

In post 1866, ² wrote:wrong.

- f

So, then, who is scum?

TMT. Setting aside that horrible waste of a meta dive that Nacho provoked and just looking at his posts in this game, I think AJ is scum. MS is leaning scum for me, but buldermar thinks he's solid scum. My 4th would be TD. I'd give Nacho more weight on that one but between him letting me flounder around in old Aj games and having a shit read on us this game, I don't think I'll be weighing his read all that heavily wrt to my own reactions to TD's posts.

- f

this is weak cos you are not trying to find the head before the ass

you are going after low hanging fruit

In post 1884, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:

In post 1868, fferyllt wrote:

In post 1867, Varsoon wrote:

In post 1866, ² wrote:wrong.

- f

So, then, who is scum?

TMT. Setting aside that horrible waste of a meta dive that Nacho provoked and just looking at his posts in this game, I think AJ is scum. MS is leaning scum for me, but buldermar thinks he's solid scum. My 4th would be TD. I'd give Nacho more weight on that one but between him letting me flounder around in old Aj games and having a shit read on us this game, I don't think I'll be weighing his read all that heavily wrt to my own reactions to TD's posts.

- f

this is weak cos you are not trying to find the head before the ass

you are going after low hanging fruit

You know more about them reputation-wise than I do. It's one of the reasons why I lean on the reads of players that I know in games right now.

- f

In post 1865, Varsoon wrote:

In post 1852, Ghostlin wrote:

In post 1817, Varsoon wrote:Makes me think--in a Lylo situation, all players could quote their role PMs directly, and the one guy who isn't modkilled is the scum, because he would have to lie or be modkilled. Then again, I guess if everyone is modkilled, there's no one to lynch the remaining scum.

WHAT THE FUCK. WHY WOULD YOUR BRAIN EVEN GO HERE??

I am some sort of evil genius, or absolute retard, according to 2.


Anyway, let's lynch 2.
VOTE: 2

2, you're scum, right?

Please don't waste my time.

- b

In post 1873, Nachomamma8 wrote:and i will always listen to you even if i have to lynch you
no matter what <3

That's sort of a paradox, don't you think?

- b

In post 1880, Nachomamma8 wrote:

In post 1879, ² wrote:I don't have MS leaning town. He's probably the weakest of my scum reads. buldermar's read is stronger. the observation about 30 pages in 15 minutes was a moment of whoa for me. I am a pretty fast reader, but I can't touch that reading a game thread.

He's not reading, but that's pretty normal for him.

He also made a list of 7 town reads and 1 scum read in these 15 minutes.

- b

In post 1881, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote: I think he is playing genuinely after subbing into a lengthy game where he does not understand the dynamics <----- not anti-town in my book. YMMV

So why the hell do you want me to show that he previously played anti-town when we don't even agree on what constitutes playing anti-town in the first place?

- b

I want to establish that you can point to where you thought he was being anti-town

In post 1890, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:I want to establish that you can point to where you thought he was being anti-town

I can't point to where exactly I established that impression of him. Like I said; I recall him being anti-town in previous games - that's it.

- b

buldey is ffery around?

In post 1893, Nachomamma8 wrote:buldey is ffery around?

I'll check.

- b

She's on her way.

Why don't you want to play with me anymore?

- b

Replacement here.

In post 1895, ² wrote:She's on her way.

Why don't you want to play with me anymore?

- b

because you're in "fuck you" mode and ffery will be nicer to me

and i've been ignoring her a little, where i tried to reach out to you so many times and you never did what i wanted you to do

In post 1897, Nachomamma8 wrote:

In post 1895, ² wrote:She's on her way.

Why don't you want to play with me anymore?

- b

because you're in "fuck you" mode and ffery will be nicer to me

But there has to be room for disagreements in a strong relationship, right?

- b