Page 76 of 235

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:25 am
by borkjerfkin
Votecount 1.13


[6] RachMarie (zMuffinMan, Andrius, Desperado, Saki, Aj The Epic, Mutleyddmc)
[5] Andrius (notscience, Trust Fund, Malakittens, RachMarie, Faster Than Light)
[3] Mutleyddmc (Ghostlin, Nachomamma8, TiphaineDeath)
[2] mastin2 (BROseidon, nickthename)
[1] BROseidon (Sound of Silence)
[1] nickthename (mastin2)
[1] TiphaineDeath (Venmar)

[2] Not Voting (BeautyAndTheBeast, Mac)

With 21 alive, it is 11 to lynch.

Let me know if you see any problems.

Deadline is in (expired on 2013-08-26 08:30:00)

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:30 am
by Aj The Epic
Venny, that vote really doesn't fly with me. There's way too much to drop a random vote now.

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:30 am
by Trust Fund
Hi guys. I'm here. A mix of Tales of Xillia being awesome (aka lusting over milla) and a few other things have been keeping me from my true love in this thread. But hey, I'm back now. Catching up.

~sasha

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:31 am
by Venmar
It's not random, TD is scum.

I might vote Andrius if it comes down to it, but would prefer TD of course.

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:53 am
by Aj The Epic
Any specific reason/post that caught your eye?

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 5:17 am
by Venmar
Yeah his absence, which is in line with his scum meta i think

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:33 am
by TiphaineDeath
I'm hear, just not particularly active right now do to time constraints. If someone asks me a question or something pops up that bother me, I'll prod it.

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:36 am
by BeautyAndTheBeast
In post 1872, Aj The Epic wrote:Because how do you type accurately when you're truly drunk? One, you shouldn't even be playing mafia at that point, but two, truly drunk people are rarely that coherent.
It's really not as hard as you think it is.

VOTE: Nickthename

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:59 am
by Aj The Epic
I've never been drunk, or drinking. Therefore, I can only tell you what I see from everyone else who acts like a fool.

I don't mind Nick as a vote, (especially after his last useless post) but if you're planning to pushing that wagon over Andrius, I'm going to assume you now see andrius as town, correct?

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 7:08 am
by BeautyAndTheBeast
I am.

Mollie is still fency but I think she's leaning town on him.

We're currently hashing out reads together.

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 7:18 am
by notscience
Majiffy what about nacho

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 7:22 am
by BeautyAndTheBeast
Leaving him to Mollie.

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 9:22 am
by RachMarie
Ok I grant I worded that badly.

I am not saying that skull now his replacement is not scum or is scum, I was saying pushing on a player who clearly was going to be replaced for flaking out was going after low hanging fruit. I am hoping the replacement will clear up that slot of us so we know what skull was. Which is why I had Skull as null.

Hope that makes more sense?

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 9:24 am
by Trust Fund
In post 1125, Trust Fund wrote:
In post 1123, Skullduggery wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Mastin2
Skull joins cool kids club list.
Next person to try to misrep this post gets a free Syr-swearfest, i'm tired of keeping him chained up.

"Cool kids club" != "cabd's townlist" it means "you're voting for the wagon I am currently on and supporting and urging people onto, cool"

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 9:25 am
by RachMarie
oh mutley replaced skull and then voted for me :facepalm:

So mutley why that vote? Even if my intent was not clear why would you vote for someone who was making a point about not focusing on someone who was going to be replaced (which kinda indicates wait for the replacement to come in and clarify that slot).

How is that scummy?

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 9:27 am
by notscience
In post 1888, Trust Fund wrote:
In post 1125, Trust Fund wrote:
In post 1123, Skullduggery wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Mastin2
Skull joins cool kids club list.
Next person to try to misrep this post gets a free Syr-swearfest, i'm tired of keeping him chained up.

"Cool kids club" != "cabd's townlist" it means "you're voting for the wagon I am currently on and supporting and urging people onto, cool"
omigod

Now I'm excited

Ask Syr how he eels about nacho plox

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 9:40 am
by BeautyAndTheBeast
In post 1888, Trust Fund wrote:
In post 1125, Trust Fund wrote:
In post 1123, Skullduggery wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Mastin2
Skull joins cool kids club list.
Next person to try to misrep this post gets a free Syr-swearfest, i'm tired of keeping him chained up.

"Cool kids club" != "cabd's townlist" it means "you're voting for the wagon I am currently on and supporting and urging people onto, cool"
do you think mebbe you can get around to answering the question that I asked

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 9:41 am
by Trust Fund
The one syr wouldn't shut up about yesterday re RW meta?

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 9:45 am
by Trust Fund
In post 1623, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:@ syr

I asked him about bro's play in red wedding and if he was seeing the same weird uncertainty. nacho scum read him in that game but they were both still alive in xeno while I was dead. I understood why nacho was reading him as scum cos the xeno and the rw game held vastly different play by bro. I would like mac's input on that and nacho's now that is able to put the 2 games in perspective.
Uh... bro only had like 13 posts, one of them was RVS, and another was him replacing out. He was VT, and yeah he scumread nacho but like... it was very passive play. I don't really think RW meta is very data-heavy because of how detached bro was from the game in general. WHat little data we can gain says that nacho doing his townbloc thing is what reversed his scumread into a townread.

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 9:53 am
by mastin2
In post 1617, Sound of Silence wrote:I fucking hate elaborate association analysis sans flips. I can't think how many times the majority of the so called associations have turned out to be among town players. There aren't many slouches in this player list. Scum associations will probably be pretty subtle.
Which is why I kept things relatively simple (as to not violate occam's razor) while also pointing out how the subtle interactions looked like they're from scum. I fully admit, my analysis isn't perfect. I'm probably wrong on at least one read, given the likely number of scum this game. But I
do
think that it's worth bringing attention to.
Spoiler: To Venmar
In post 1805, Venmar wrote:The thing with Mastin is that i'm seeing half of his play as part of his scum meta, and the other as part of his town meta. The big posts, even though I think they're not that good, look like his town self, and his general posting looks align with his town mentality. What bugs me is that Mastin enjoys weird and obscure votes on non-momentum wagons / players as scum, and Mastins attitude in his first few posts also look really scummy, not to mention Mastins spur of activity was inspired by the wagon that grew on him which makes him look beetlejuicy. The fact he has receeded back I think means his posting was just response to pressure and wasn't town motivated...
I'll give you a helpful hint: don't try to meta me. :P Like, seriously. I've been in 120+ games for sure. (Probably more, but not that I can confirm.) Of them, roughly half have been on mastin2. (And another 30 or so on Mastin, and the remaining on hydras and alts which have a different meta.) *I* don't know my meta. (And even if I did, the very act of me being aware of my meta spurns me to change said meta. :P I constantly evolve my play, and adapt my play to specific games and specific playerlists regardless of alignment. No two games are alike.) If I can't know my own meta, what makes you think that some upstart with only a few games of exposure to me can know it? ;)

That's not to say nobody can get an accurate read on me. You can get townreads and scumreads that are correct, especially if you've hydra'd with me and know my general thought process in a game. But said reads are not based off of meta from two or three random games. Rather, they're based off of in-thread posting, and how I make myself be obvtown or (accidentally, obviously :P) obvscum. I'm not saying it's impossible for someone to get an accurate meta read. I am saying that I've never seen anyone GET a successful meta read. Use meta on me, sure. And use it to OBTAIN a read, sure, but not a meta-read itself. (For instance, an example of using meta to GET a read is to point out a generality in my play, "Mastin always does that", and then to explain the town-reasoning and scum-reasoning behind it, and which way the person believes I am leaning, more or less.) Basically, if you're town who's trying to meta me, you're doing it wrong if you expect to get a clear picture of alignment.

There's a reason my MD theory focuses so heavily on the
generalities
of meta and covering a wide variety of games, emphasizing the strengths of meta (understanding how a player thinks, in general, as scum, and as town), and also the weaknesses (that players evolve/adapt their play and that no two games are identical) of it.

Buuuuut, let me humor you anyway. :P My scum meta used to be voting on non-momentum lynches, yes, but it's not anymore. My scum meta is more like I focus on players who I see as realistically having a chance at being mislynched, but who're not the dominant wagon. "...Isn't...that...what you're doing with nick?" Yes, it is, admittedly. :P I don't really have any answer for that, in fact. If you want to base a vote on me off of that pattern, then I have no explanation to it, other than that I'm not scum. I guess I can invent reasons, which're probably true to some extent, but they're still BS. :P Reasons like "I don't like being on big wagons in general" (which is true, but hasn't really contributed to my play as far as I know), "I adapt successful elements of my scum play into my town play" (which is also true, but again, probably doesn't apply to targetting a secondary-tier lynch person), and such. Yet those are all half-hearted; I really don't have anything to explain that. It's just there, and I'm town.

As for the bit about my activity, check the timestamps. My activity has been consistent without the aid of wagon or no wagon. The exception to this is on weekends, which I have marked as V/LA in my signature for dang-good reasoning. My activity levels have been the same regardless of whether someone has called my name. I'll admit, many of my posts are addressed to people who call out my name, but that's because they're calling out my name and I don't want to ignore them. :P There's plenty in my posting which isn't about players calling my name, though.

You should sort me out today, though. Don't wait until the night. Believe me, I'm far more likely to be nightkilled than you think, so I wouldn't waste effort trying to read me. You can trust me to be town.
For the record--miiiiiiight be moving Venmar back into town.

...Aw, heck. I'm moving Venmar back into town. I'm trusting him to be town, despite what I've said about him.

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 10:04 am
by Mac
In post 1887, RachMarie wrote:Ok I grant I worded that badly.

I am not saying that skull now his replacement is not scum or is scum, I was saying pushing on a player who clearly was going to be replaced for flaking out was going after low hanging fruit. I am hoping the replacement will clear up that slot of us so we know what skull was. Which is why I had Skull as null.

Hope that makes more sense?
makes sense but i dont understand how you could say for certain skull was obviously going to flake. And it is still driving people away from the skull slot.

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:19 am
by Saki
In post 1852, Mutleyddmc wrote:Don't bother Saki. It's just all fluff, trust me I read it
If
mutley's
telling me not to read something holy shit I shouldn't read it.

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:22 am
by Saki
In post 1844, Faster Than Light wrote:Saki, welcome to hell.
What a warm welcome.
In post 1856, Faster Than Light wrote:Saki? Spammy? We've seen worse.
Oh, oh, don't dare me ._
In post 1868, Mutleyddmc wrote:
In post 1866, notscience wrote:Mutt your vote is shit

:L

Your role is shit. Be scum soon please
NS is town you little shit >_>
In post 1877, Trust Fund wrote:~sasha
If this is what I think it is (AW flavor) then I fucking love you.

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:23 am
by Saki
Oh and
UNVOTE:

Why is Rach scummy I did a quick ISO and I don't find her remotely so

Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:29 am
by Trust Fund
In post 1897, Saki wrote: If this is what I think it is (AW flavor) then I fucking love you.
Love accepted.