In post 41, PeaceBringer wrote: In post 4, SleepyKrew wrote:What is UP
I'm really excited
Also I'll probably be really
angry later
on so look out in case I go INCREDIBLE HULK
Also, my role is a
negative utility
.
So thinking it over, people are voting and calling SleepyKrew scum because of perhaps these 2 things. Now, as I read negative utility it is not declaring scum but declaring that his role has a negative impact on the village. So the player is town but may have some impact that does not benefit town. At any rate
Vote SleepKrew
, we need to know what the "negative utility" is because he/she/it boldy proclaimed having it...
This post is weird when PB considers himself a negative utility role as well.
In post 61, PeaceBringer wrote: In post 60, PeaceBringer wrote:
any sense of fear is projected from your end... no fear from me... looks like you are looking for validation of one thing or another or seeing if you can get someone to go one direction or another. Just something that is noteable... also seems like a suck up quickly to another player... but those are minor observations...
and it is actually 2 people now you are "seeking for opinions" Guess what there 2 heads and 1 player in game who has any game experience with me and nothing completed. So opinions are short... but your behavior of questioning others who do not know a player about a player you do not know is intriguing...
Peacebringer developing was seemed like a strong read on theloveofneroandmollie in the middle of his SleepyKrew feels off. I found that Peacebringer-town is the type of player who is very driven by gut/instinct/impulses and it reads kind of strange that he would continue a policy push while letting someone who he is reading as scummy go scot-free.
In post 123, PeaceBringer wrote:Oh and I basically agree N&M is likely town at this juncture... had to give them crap though over the "Oh, what do you think of peacebringer nonsense" such stuff is silly, but that is me... everyone enjoys differently...
This is a surprise, but lends more to Peacebringer town. Normally his attacks are to mislynch or discredit, I can't see him making a blind rush at someone in order to call them town a minute later, that seems like it follows more of the impulsive Peacebringer that I know and I love.
In post 142, PeaceBringer wrote:so, here is a time to ask a question you fine pair of lover birds. Is Kat's behavior true to his normal self or not? I only go on tone and keep flipping. But the SK play may have about run it's course... See I know there is a propensity of town to jump on something minor, think they hit scum and really just hit stinky bait... for me, used to fishing where there are walleyes and other fish that take a while to bite and far more complex. Her it is like sunnies snapping at bait by a dock. one post and wham bamm...get a reaction. The answer to my question can help me sort it out a bit more...
Didn't like this post, don't really know why.
In post 208, Rail Tracer wrote:neromollie wrote:Tell me why I shouldn't have you as null?
you (or your other head) have formed a town read on sleepykrew off almost no content, i'm wondering how you haven't formed any read on me whatsoever given the amount of stuff i've posted.
you know I don't have anything close to a read on you this far through the read
In post 256, PeaceBringer wrote:as to kats, hey guys, those of you that want reasons and such... go skim some of his scum games and compare the town with tone games and tone here...
tell me what you think the tone showed here has more in common with... either that or simply vote kats... Get R done. Of course you could always ignore but really not the wisest course.
THIS was weird as hell to me. I don't see PB meta'ing Katsuki and pushing a difference based on tone; I can see him posting a case on someone for a variety of reasons, but this isn't one of them that comes to mind.
In post 266, PeaceBringer wrote:that was weird. Post 6, 70, and 118
3). Read for yourself or ignore it. You care about whether Kats is scum go check for your self. I do not do the kind of stuff you want. Go look for yourself. If not, then to bad so sad. Kats is scum. Go hunt for yourself.
I liked this! "I'm not going to give you what you want, so find out why I'm right your own damn self"
this was a pretty fucking stupid thing to rip on but I couldn't really see scum pushing on this type of thing
In post 296, PeaceBringer wrote:eh, reading over deasvail, I thinking more likely town, does not really have the same feel for when someone is scum-dogging me... feels the normal dogging me...
Liked this as well, didn't really have any purpose as PB-scum.
In post 321, Dante wrote: In post 320, Rail Tracer wrote:... even if this weren't something that town players do, why not comment on peacebringer bringing up katsuki's meta? why is mnemonic scum for doing it?
I asked the Magic 8-ball if you were scum.
The reply:
YES!
I don't understand why Dante switched votes here. It was hilarious, yes, but if he had some sort of inherent hate of meta'ing like I'd expect him to, then it doesn't make sense for him to let that push go so easily.
In post 500, Dante wrote:You tell me? What's the point to using meta? IMO...to see if a pattern exists in a player's game play. It's day 1. What pattern can you find that relates to another game. SillyCindy told a joke last game to start the game and she was town...this time she played all serious...she must be scum. Yeah, that works often. Just another reason to cast a lame vote...IMO...No way to determine a pattern till some blood hits the street. So asking for another's game history strikes me as lazy and just another way to make shit up. Personally, I'd rather vote using the Magic 8-ball scum detector than use some BS meta on day 1.
This confirms to me that he had a very real hate of metaing, so not pursuing it seems even stranger to me.
In post 753, Dante wrote:Right now Mnemonic Device is hard scum...too little commentary even when called out.
Voting for lurking is literally the easiest vote possible.
In post 802, Rail Tracer wrote:hmm
@PV
if you have no information to verify yourself today, in your first post, i want you to declare the first and last letters of each word in your role, as well as how many letters there are in each word.
e.g. if you had dopog's role, you'd put N _ _- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ e N _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r
i'll consider refusal to do this a scum claim, since if you are town it shouldn't give scum any additional information, and if you're scum, i want to limit your fake-claims as much as possible.
I liked this plan a lot, actually.
In post 833, PeaceBringer wrote:
that is a lie or you are paranoid...
might as well claim then- my role is Networker. It is negative ultility.
There may be logic in my dying, as anyone who has a QT has full access during the day as long as alive. I die they lose it.
This is actually the weakest response to a guilty that I've ever seen from a town player. The bolded is especially weird since he has a guilty on him that he knows sure as hell isn't true and he's like "eh, there might be a good reason for killing me anyways".
In post 980, PeaceBringer wrote: In post 978, PeregrineV wrote: In post 960, Mitillos wrote:@RC: I'd like some more information from you. No references to other games, though. You claimed a guilty result on Peace. What is your role? Do you know how reliable this result is? Why did you not vote Peace, if you have a guilty result on him?
@Pere: Your links seem a bit off. Anyway, maybe Networker is just N's N-word for Encryptor? You know, like Namecaller was the N-word for Framer.
He presented us with his N-name (Networker), but not his regular rolename (Encoder/Encrypter)?
I guess that's possible, but why the confusion? Peace has been playing 9 years, I think that he would know and distinguish the difference between a Networker role and Networker role-name.
Vote: Peacebringer
that is really stretching things on your end and from what I have seen better player than this... I do not give a flying fig what the
"role is normally" called, as it is called what it is this game and pretty straight forward.
I do not believe you are stupid, therefore scum.
Everyone else has an "in other words" role, and I'm not sure Peacebringer would be able to figure out Networker but not Encryptor. Regardless of that, the bolded is still weird as fuck.
In post 1049, Rail Tracer wrote:it's fucking dumb how few wagons have happened this game. there's been like the Katsuki wagon, the dopog lynch wagon, and this pitiful fucking excuse for a mnem wagon.
no other major wagons because nobody seems to give a shit about pushing their votes.
this frustration seems very real
In post 1199, PeaceBringer wrote:deadline is fast approaching... nothing from mneumonic... I think there Is like 3 hours left till deadline...
Another thing that makes me uncomfortable about PB is the extent to which he's disappeared from D1 to now.
Why was SK town again?
In post 1641, PeaceBringer wrote:Not normal, not bastard. mod said there is at least one Townie. So my guess is one of rail and dante is the liar there. But will engage in more analysis of each claim and the in game behavior as get more time tomorrow.
this seems like the weird shit that town would be more likely to say than scum; scum wouldn't be like "oh there's only one VT in the game which means there's a liar in Dante/Rail", although he never pursued this at all.
weak response
In post 1677, PeaceBringer wrote:heh, forgot to come to this, but with Radiant's stance and toughts we are going to be doomed anyway, unless RC is scum.
This was cool.
In post 1711, PeaceBringer wrote: In post 1691, Varsoon wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Dante
Scum don't type like Mitilos is typing.
Dante wagon is better for me right now.
well if you are not scum and mitilos is not scum you just gave scum the game...
you REALLY need to watch your vote.
I have literally no idea what the fuck this means.
In post 1713, PeaceBringer wrote:Rail Tracer: He is very sketchy at this point. What has he done? He has essentially led each and every lynch and town has been following him by the nose hairs. He consistently stears away from certain players (Luna, Shadow, Ooba) to be precise. He white knighted me on day one and other days. Now at LyLo pushing my lynch. It is finding an easy target to lynch and win the game. If you examine reads and game comments you can note subtle pointing one way and disengaging another. Oh, and he did subtlely encourage my PV take and let that serve as distraction as long as possible.
this seems like something peacebringer town would say
My main worries about Peacebringer were that as scum he can fake that genuine tone pretty fucking beautifully, while he dropped the fuck off the map after D1 (then dropped back on it now), his role sticks out of other roles pretty sorely (and there is weirdness around his claiming of it), and his reaction to getting a guilty on him made no sense from any town player whatsoever. But a couple of his genuine notes strike genuine enough where I can look at the rest of it and call it Peacebringer play.
RT read is mostly due to genuineness and necessity. I'm mostly not willing to think about this one too much because I'm tired as fuck, but there are a few key townie points (there's some real frustration in lurkfuckiness, although not to the same degree that it featured in Xenogears), and I think the way he looked back on the past few days in a way akin to a frat bro seeing pictures of him passed out on a table without any clothes seemed genuine and unlikely to be coming from scum.
Dante hasn't done jack or shit, and we've gotten to the point where the things that made me lean town on him don't make me lean town so far anymore.