Mafiascum.net

The fuck does Slog mean

Cabd you still gonna shoot me?

I'm going to be bugged if he does

In post 1872, Cabd wrote:

In post 1868, zMuffinMan wrote:oh yeah i wasn't around when it was being discussed but i agree with whoever said mass claim today is a good idea

That was me.


Neighbors, Vig, Doctor. Expecting at most one more PR for town.

So are we doing this?

In post 1855, Nachomamma8 wrote:

In post 1852, Selkies wrote:

In post 1837, Nachomamma8 wrote:Also why is me giving you a reads list so important to you? That's not the way I've chosen to play this game, and thus that is not ow m going to play.

What's the reason for playing this game the way you are?

There's no definite reason. I just felt like playing the game this way.
A funny answer would be in Natirasha's honor, but unfortunately that doesn't hold much truth to it.

Do you think you could play the game more honestly? Give more reads. The fact that you've blatantly disagreed to give reads is disturbing. Especially for you.

In post 1867, Bert wrote:You know guys, the silver linings playbook

The silver lining is that muffin's probably town for that Generic-esque tantrum

If it's not him...

Vote: IdiotKing

Time to figure you out next

Oh look one of Muffinz points held true. Bert just joined Nacho's vote because of the flow of the game.

Wanna give reasoning?

In post 1879, Selkies wrote:

In post 1872, Cabd wrote:

In post 1868, zMuffinMan wrote:oh yeah i wasn't around when it was being discussed but i agree with whoever said mass claim today is a good idea

That was me.


Neighbors, Vig, Doctor. Expecting at most one more PR for town.

So are we doing this?

Deadline's in 4 days. Think there's still enough time?

Yeah, good point.

My reads are off - SSK might be doc, muffin's rage and inappropriate stuff he pulled is probably town...

So I'm gonna look into others. I have Aronis as town and muffin as town, so I'm resetting

I have a hunch that notsci is with IK but that'll wait for tomorrow when I have more time to sort through old posts

In post 1883, Bert wrote:I have a hunch that notsci is with IK but that'll wait for tomorrow when I have more time to sort through old posts

I will say that Generic and ETL rage in the past as either alignment though

And Tammy did it well in Too Many Heads past game

Later

Notsci you could have defended me when that guy called me a scum and retard with learning problems lol

I be disappoint we r in a masonry

In post 1886, Bert wrote:Notsci you could have defended me when that guy called me a scum and retard with learning problems lol

I wasn't aware you needed defending from the temper tantrum

I'm trying to figure out why muffin would profess a scumread on you with so many others townreading you

Here let me pull a Nat-notscience gambit from 1526



Notsci we aren't masons, we lied.

Good point!!! I'm still working on not getting frustrated with tantrums though so moral support is da bomb. I fed the tantrum too, I was so ashamed last night.

Also

Wasn't it obvious we aren't lol

And you saw where voting the mod got SSK

pedit-

AHHHH yeah it's just like lolwhatever let him throw a fit if he wants

Why the selkies vote?

Idk obvscum ffery from 1526?

Yeah I tried to channel your "bite me" attitude, didn't work the way I envisioned. I'll just ignore next time but I tried standing up for myself once and it does not feel good lol

bite me is pretty much idgaf

We need to hydra soon so I can learn how to do the idgaf thing better

WE ALREADY HAVE A HYDRA

WE HAVE TWO

LOL

So here's how I see things:

Assume that 1 of the neighborhood is scum, and assume that there are 3 scum (which I think is about average for this size of game). I don't think Nat would be so cruel as to make there be two scum in the neighborhood.

We have 11 players.
-3 neighbors is 8 players.
1 has claimed a confirmable role (at least so far as confirming a distinct NK), so most likely is not scum.
1 has claimed a doc (which can be verified either via getting scum NK-d or by blocking a scum kill.)
That leaves 6 players with about 2 of them being scum. Assuming Cabd is telling the truth (which he most likely is, because why would scum false-claim a confirmable role?), we have a shot at killing 2 of these players, 1 with a lynch and 1 with a NK.

I think it would be wise for Cabd to specify who is going to shoot tonight, and have SSK protect someone else (or have Cabd put up a short list and SSK protect someone else). On the off chance that Cabd lists town in the shortlist, scum won't want to run the risk of double-shooting and wasting a NK, so if one of Cabd's list is killed we will have reason to trust him. It also means that SSK will be putting his potential protection somewhere where 1. it won't be blocking our vig confirm and 2. it will have the highest chance of blocking a scum kill.


As for the neighborhood, both Muffin and I are thinking Aronis is scum. For me at least this would be boosted by a bert flip, because I'm still thinking Aronis and bert are scum together.

In post 1896, Idiotking wrote:or by blocking a scum kill.

Nokill gambit is a thing.

There's about a -50% chance bert's scum

In post 1896, Idiotking wrote:On the off chance

This is freaking me out. It's statistically more likely that I do than not so why this wording?