Page 76 of 189
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:35 am
by Chara
actually maybe i wouldn't call Brigitte town. she'd be in a null category because i don't know what to do there.
Ank's stance i get because it seems in line with how she's been forming her reads, but the lack of reasoning i've seen from skitter about Brigitte scum is bothering me.
but i might've missed that reasoning somewhere, if so i would really appreciate a quote.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:41 am
by Chara
VOTE: tris
not done here though.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:46 am
by Chara
In post 1056, tris wrote:VOTE: Nimueh
Anything to say about someone other than NMSA (Or I guess tictac)?
In post 1061, tris wrote: In post 1059, Nimueh wrote: In post 1056, tris wrote:VOTE: Nimueh
Anything to say about someone other than NMSA (Or I guess tictac)?
I’ve V/LA because I haven’t been feeling well, so no I’m not caught up yet but if this is your sole reason for for voting me, it isn’t a town one.
VOTE: Tris
Alright, fair enough.
UNVOTE:
logically i know why tris unvoted here. Nim called her out on voting her just for activity.
which, yes, it wasn't a good reason for a vote with Nim having a hard time to catch up, but it's been bothering me. i don't know tris as a player at all but if her approach is always this defanged i might be making something out of nothing.
there's
1045 where tris gives a neutral stance on Brigitte.
later, tris votes her but i don't see any real reason for it.
she asks two questions to Brigitte after that but it seems like the answers don't matter.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:48 am
by Chara
followup on the last post, i think it's possible tris is town who realized her reasoning was bad, or she's scum who decided to pivot after Nim called her scummy if her vote was just for Nim's activity. so scum tris decided it was better to just pull back.
Brigitte wagon however, that has a lot of support and Brigitte's been active.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:53 am
by skitter30
In post 1875, Chara wrote:actually maybe i wouldn't call Brigitte town. she'd be in a null category because i don't know what to do there.
Ank's stance i get because it seems in line with how she's been forming her reads, but the lack of reasoning i've seen from skitter about Brigitte scum is bothering me.
but i might've missed that reasoning somewhere, if so i would really appreciate a quote.
i basically decided to sheep ank on brigitte (kinda exactly like how i just sheeped you on varsoon and stopped pushing him last time even though i didn't particularly agree)
i don't particularly see it but rn i don't townread brigitte really and i townread ank enough and am ready for the day to be over enough that i'm just willing to sheep her
none of the other wagons rn are particularly appealing to me, and i think since the gameday is starting to come to a close we should be coalescing onto one wagon instead of starting new ones. (i do kinda like the idea of a tris wagon tbh)
like it's not that i really scumread brigitte, it's more like it's the most agreeable wagon to me rn out of all of the existing wagons (and the fact that the wagon is largely formed by slots i townread reassures me too)
not sure why you've lost your townread on me
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:55 am
by Chara
you should join me on tris anyway. we have all these replacements in, the status quo doesn't need to be that.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:56 am
by Chara
In post 1879, skitter30 wrote:i basically decided to sheep ank on brigitte (kinda exactly like how i just sheeped you on varsoon and stopped pushing him last time even though i didn't particularly agree)
even though Varsoon was scum and sheeping me was the wrong thing to do, as it turned out?
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:58 am
by Chara
it's just sort of weird to me that you'd bring that up as a reason for you to be sheeping again when last time it didn't work out for you.
and that's different from me asking you to vote tris, since you do actually scumread her.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:58 am
by tris
In post 1878, Chara wrote:followup on the last post, i think it's possible tris is town who realized her reasoning was bad, or she's scum who decided to pivot after Nim called her scummy if her vote was just for Nim's activity. so scum tris decided it was better to just pull back.
Brigitte wagon however, that has a lot of support and Brigitte's been active.
I voted for Nim because I wanted to prompt her to talk about players other than NMSA. I then unvoted because she indicated that she was trying to catch up. I didn't feel like keeping my vote there would do any good.
For Brigitte, I didn't like the case she made on Ank, and she's never really done anything that feels like town.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:59 am
by tris
I do wonder why skitter seems reluctant to vote for me.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:01 am
by tris
In post 1879, skitter30 wrote:(and the fact that the wagon is largely formed by slots i townread reassures me too)
And me who you considered voting earlier.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:02 am
by Chara
hm. alright. i can sort of agree with that.
1733 has this hindsight scumread on Brigitte that seemed like a setup rather than an actual look at her play.
what didn't you like about the case specifically?
pedit: i had a thought about you being scum together but i don't feel like skitter would softbus her partner on day 1. it looks really bad if scum you ever flips. so i find it unlikely it's both of you.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:11 am
by tris
It was the part about Ank's scumread of her being a copy of hers on Ank. But not just the initial argument there. Her response in
1212 I especially didn't like. The interactions with Reck later were not great. I don't know if they were necessarily scummy, but they weren't town.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:15 am
by tris
In post 1886, Chara wrote:
pedit: i had a thought about you being scum together but i don't feel like skitter would softbus her partner on day 1. it looks really bad if scum you ever flips. so i find it unlikely it's both of you.
I find her reluctance to vote me strange, but I'm not sure how it would make sense for scum. The only explanation I can think of is she didn't want to lynch her partner like you say, but I know that's not the case of course. I still do think she's town.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:38 am
by Chara
another thing for skitter: you've justified your paranoia about me with the lack of nightkills multiple times; scum Chara can't remove you by killing you.
but you also have mentioned a few times that you keep forgetting the game is nightless, regarding your townread on Ank that she would probably be nightkilled if town.
so it's a weird juxtaposition between remembering it's nightless every single time you mention your paranoia of me, but then what about your decision regarding Ank? are you stringly townreading her or are you townreading her with the caveat she would be removed if town?
and then something something tmi, i feel like skitter's one of the only players who even keeps bringing up the nightless thing.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:54 am
by Ankamius
if skitter legitimately is scum this game and I actually did catch her immediately, I'm going to lol
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:57 am
by Elbirn
K I'm 66 pages back, no one will talk to me, and I now refuse to acknowledge anything before this post. The game starts now.
Gosh golly gee wizz I cant wait to start playing this game with you guys
VOTE: Chara
Why are you being a meanie to skitty shes nice
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:05 am
by Chara
In post 1890, Ankamius wrote:if skitter legitimately is scum this game and I actually did catch her immediately, I'm going to lol
so am i being paranoid or do you think there's something here.
Elbirn: why is skitter town for you? it seems like my posts on this page answered your "why".
and i seem to remember someone directly asking for your thoughts about a specific interaction. i think that was skitter.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:11 am
by tris
This was it.
In post 1594, skitter30 wrote: In post 1591, Elbirn wrote:I'm so far behind and I dont feel like I'm a part of this game and I dont know how to get a word in edge wise
Someone spoon feed me or ask me to look at a specific something or something
what do you think of the ank/brig/reck thing that started around here:
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:14 am
by Creature
Damn, I should've done my thing yesterday
Today I feel pretty moodless to anything
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:14 am
by Creature
What are the shitty reads we have so far?
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:27 am
by Ankamius
In post 1892, Chara wrote: In post 1890, Ankamius wrote:if skitter legitimately is scum this game and I actually did catch her immediately, I'm going to lol
so am i being paranoid or do you think there's something here.
Elbirn: why is skitter town for you? it seems like my posts on this page answered your "why".
and i seem to remember someone directly asking for your thoughts about a specific interaction. i think that was skitter.
quote me where skitter justified her paranoia with the lack of nightkills
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:28 am
by Creature
In post 4, Brigitte wrote:Reporting in for duty on the Anukat Topaz!
I believe I have been assigned to kitchen duty today.
What would everyone like to eat tonight?
This person is on watch duty tonight:
VOTE: u r a person 2
In post 6, Brigitte wrote:Even more reason for you to be on watch!
You need be on watch for night and enemies.
I like these tbh.
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:29 am
by Creature
In post 19, Enter wrote:Seeing as there's no corporal in the navy
VOTE: Brigitte
Time to bring back lynch all liars.
Town
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:30 am
by Creature
Brigitte and Enter are town.
Why are we wagoning Brigitte?