Mafiascum.net

What does miscancel mean?

In post 1861, geraintm wrote:

In post 1825, Galron wrote:

In post 1155, geraintm wrote:@galron

I dislike players who tag people as scum, place lots of votes. If a player ends up thinking 80% of the players are scum then that isn't helpful, and I felt it was what you were doing in the first half ofnyesterfay

It reminds me of this, which was also scummy.

just because I had a read on you which points you as scum, that doesn't make it scummy

It wasn't based in fact. Scummy. And you disregarded my correcting you on it. Scummy. And you choose to continue to disregard the facts. Scummy. And you insert this gem without acknowledging my correction. Scummy. It is, indeed, scummy. And it continues to be, scummy. And you, my good king, are scummy.



You would have my vote if we had more time on the clock.

In post 1871, UnaBombaH wrote:Their posting has been off for some time now

I should return to the alleged "fluff" posting I suppose.

In post 1875, Replacement for Sujimichi wrote:What does miscancel mean?

I believe it means mis-execute.

But the talk of the town is why Mr. BombaH gave you and me asterisks.

In post 1852, Replacement for Sujimichi wrote:

In post 1828, Galron wrote:

In post 1725, UnaBombaH wrote:RfS and Bella should both relocate to another wagon within Bella/RfS/Galron, and then we can all have a talk. Agreed?

Hmm... I have a sinking feeling.

Sinking in what way - like quicksand or a ship? You think all 3 are town?

Also, why aren't you joining me on Bob?

A sinking feeling about someone else.

In post 1878, Galron wrote:But the talk of the town is why Mr. BombaH gave you and me asterisks.

Because you are #1 and #2 in my list right now. You being #1, and RfS being the first compromise. As I tried to put it in words instead of numbers or an order in a list.
The colors are only there to make it more obvious where I'm at.
But if that's the first/only/last thing you managed to pick up from that, good on you.
Just the kind of posting that fits my current read on you.

In post 1879, Galron wrote:A sinking feeling about someone else.

And this was the thing I didn't want to bring up myself until you were at E-1, but since you pointed at it again..
You are talking about me here, right? And even if you aren't - why not make it more obvious to everyone right away?
Because that would be the townier course of action, and considering you WERE one vote away from being lynched, you should always out everything you have in your mind at the time.
OR did you KNOW someone was going to unvote anyway? Or at least not hammer you away quickly?

You know, I really think there was 4 town on Galron at the time of this post.

In post 1828, Galron wrote:

In post 1725, UnaBombaH wrote:RfS and Bella should both relocate to another wagon within Bella/RfS/Galron, and then we can all have a talk. Agreed?

Hmm... I have a sinking feeling.

Then we get an immediate votecount afterwards, and you know what are the two things that follow?

In post 1830, Hoopla wrote:this is a strange stalemate. the two leading wagons have townreads on one another, and are voting elsewhere. this is rare. usually out of self preservation one or both wagonees will vote the other option.

it almost makes me believe this is a town/town wagon battle

with the way this game has ground to a halt.

My #1 scumread comes in and starts to spew nonsense about the wagons. And to top it all off?

In post 1833, Isis wrote:VOTE: Galron

..making it E-1 for a very brief moment, until Porkens got cold feet and unvoted.

And no. I'm not saying Porkens is the scum here, but I believe Isis voting Galron might've very well been a scum jumping on a bus.

I'm off to bed now, but I'll just say that I really want Galron to be the one we flip today.
The more I think about it, the better I feel.

We are at e-2 yea?

In post 1880, UnaBombaH wrote:

In post 1879, Galron wrote:A sinking feeling about someone else.

And this was the thing I didn't want to bring up myself until you were at E-1, but since you pointed at it again..
You are talking about me here, right? And even if you aren't - why not make it more obvious to everyone right away?
Because that would be the townier course of action, and considering you WERE one vote away from being lynched, you should always out everything you have in your mind at the time.
OR did you KNOW someone was going to unvote anyway? Or at least not hammer you away quickly?

Was I at E-1? Are my math skills really that off this game? Apparently geraintm and you need to fix me straight.

Replacement can you explain your town read on garlon. All i can see is that you think he is explaining his thought process

In post 1884, Galron wrote:

In post 1880, UnaBombaH wrote:

In post 1879, Galron wrote:A sinking feeling about someone else.

And this was the thing I didn't want to bring up myself until you were at E-1, but since you pointed at it again..
You are talking about me here, right? And even if you aren't - why not make it more obvious to everyone right away?
Because that would be the townier course of action, and considering you WERE one vote away from being lynched, you should always out everything you have in your mind at the time.
OR did you KNOW someone was going to unvote anyway? Or at least not hammer you away quickly?

Was I at E-1? Are my math skills really that off this game? Apparently geraintm and you need to fix me straight.

I see you corrected yourself, but you found another theory to fit your narrative.

In post 1885, bob3141 wrote:Replacement can you explain your town read on garlon. All i can see is that you think he is explaining his thought process

Did you miss the second half of the post? 1803

This gamestate is pretty bad. Bob should not be this hard to push and I have no idea where the townreads are coming from. The best I got from notscience was gut/tone. Does anyone have substantial reasons? Una?

In post 1888, Replacement for Sujimichi wrote:This gamestate is pretty bad. Bob should not be this hard to push and I have no idea where the townreads are coming from. The best I got from notscience was gut/tone. Does anyone have substantial reasons? Una?

I think Isis said something about meta.

VOTE: bob

In post 1887, Replacement for Sujimichi wrote:

In post 1885, bob3141 wrote:Replacement can you explain your town read on garlon. All i can see is that you think he is explaining his thought process

Did you miss the second half of the post? 1803

It comes from cherry picking, apparently. The same thing geraintm has been doing.

Why the bob vote galron

My biggest reasoning behind the bob read is how the game state felt when I pushed that

In post 1891, notscience wrote:Why the bob vote galron

The way it's going, we're going to need a viable wagon in a hurry.

It’s interesting hoops hasn’t been pushing it as much. She hates end of day wagons.

If we're going to do this, we should get on with it. Waiting until the last second is just dumb.

I agree, you should vote yourself

In post 1895, notscience wrote:It’s interesting hoops hasn’t been pushing it as much. She hates end of day wagons.

i have been solemnly lamenting this all too predictable blueprint unfolding.

believe me, it's exhausting having to always be the one to energise the town and convince people to compromise.

anyhow, i don't agree with this reignition of bob's wagon, so...

UNVOTE:
VOTE: galron

In post 1886, Galron wrote:

In post 1884, Galron wrote:

In post 1880, UnaBombaH wrote:

In post 1879, Galron wrote:A sinking feeling about someone else.

And this was the thing I didn't want to bring up myself until you were at E-1, but since you pointed at it again..
You are talking about me here, right? And even if you aren't - why not make it more obvious to everyone right away?
Because that would be the townier course of action, and considering you WERE one vote away from being lynched, you should always out everything you have in your mind at the time.
OR did you KNOW someone was going to unvote anyway? Or at least not hammer you away quickly?

Was I at E-1? Are my math skills really that off this game? Apparently geraintm and you need to fix me straight.

I see you corrected yourself, but you found another theory to fit your narrative.

I actually think this reads as paranoid town over-thinking.