Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 6:05 pm
In post 1103, Alisae wrote:@Bugs if you feel demoralized because of a certain player, that player is scum.
Period.
End of discussion.
In post 1103, Alisae wrote:@Bugs if you feel demoralized because of a certain player, that player is scum.
Period.
End of discussion.
But why do you say in the rules all PTs only have night talk?
So you seriously think I’m scum, because I’m tilted at your inability to see the obvious? Well, Idk the context but in this game it makes absolutely no sense.In post 1875, drusilla wrote:In post 1103, Alisae wrote:@Bugs if you feel demoralized because of a certain player, that player is scum.
Period.
End of discussion.
In post 1875, drusilla wrote:In post 1103, Alisae wrote:@Bugs if you feel demoralized because of a certain player, that player is scum.
Period.
End of discussion.
In post 1878, drusilla wrote:In post 1875, drusilla wrote:In post 1103, Alisae wrote:@Bugs if you feel demoralized because of a certain player, that player is scum.
Period.
End of discussion.
In post 1877, Loki Dokie wrote:So you seriously think I’m scum, because I’m tilted at your inability to see the obvious? Well, Idk the context but in this game it makes absolutely no sense.In post 1875, drusilla wrote:In post 1103, Alisae wrote:@Bugs if you feel demoralized because of a certain player, that player is scum.
Period.
End of discussion.
So the fact that I reasonably tilted at you despite everything in my ISO, voting patterns, interactions with Pooky practically screaming through the rooftops I’m beyond bleeding obvtown, you’re totally content to just ignore all of that when I have every goddamned right to be extremely irritated with you here.
In post 1882, Loki Dokie wrote:In post 1877, Loki Dokie wrote:So you seriously think I’m scum, because I’m tilted at your inability to see the obvious? Well, Idk the context but in this game it makes absolutely no sense.In post 1875, drusilla wrote:In post 1103, Alisae wrote:@Bugs if you feel demoralized because of a certain player, that player is scum.
Period.
End of discussion.
So the fact that I reasonably tilted at you despite everything in my ISO, voting patterns, interactions with Pooky practically screaming through the rooftops I’m beyond bleeding obvtown, you’re totally content to just ignore all of that when I have every goddamned right to be extremely irritated with you here.
I can play this game too. You’re wrong, End of freaking discussion. So if there’s actually some point OTHER than to you wrongly confibiasing me here, I’d love to hear it.
@ydrasse; wrt 1830, i don't think it's very likely scum bus like this when they're not in danger/there's no need to, and so comfortably too. it looks to me like pooky found something everyone else was pushing and wanted to take advantage of the situationIn post 1834, Ydrasse wrote:...okay but i literally just played a game where i was willing to like. go to the death against my partner. we did not coordinate it but it still happened like that.
if we have confirmation that scum didn't have a chance to talk i will feel more comfortable accepting that case as it is but even in the absence of any sort of day-talking it can still happen.
p-edit: ...
I have all fucking night. And I can post this as much as you continue to wrongly call me scum, just because you’re pissed at me now.In post 1880, Loki Dokie wrote:Okay @drusilla, reread any/preferrably ALL of my ISO/voting patterns/interactions with Pooky and tell me which points to my being scum - I mean other than the fact you obviously don’t like me very much right now. I’ll wait,
i... guess so? i'm probably pushing my own experiences on this game but even if there's no reason to you still can? i know i am the ass in this situation not rereading and just acting in the moment but gah.In post 1884, Kanna wrote:@ydrasse; wrt 1830, i don't think it's very likely scum bus like this when they're not in danger/there's no need to, and so comfortably too. it looks to me like pooky found something everyone else was pushing and wanted to take advantage of the situationIn post 1834, Ydrasse wrote:...okay but i literally just played a game where i was willing to like. go to the death against my partner. we did not coordinate it but it still happened like that.
if we have confirmation that scum didn't have a chance to talk i will feel more comfortable accepting that case as it is but even in the absence of any sort of day-talking it can still happen.
p-edit: ...
my point about the deadline hammer is that scum!taylor had no reason to not fake being afk and letting the timer run out. this would result in a no-lunch and scum can execute isis.
i think those 2 points are good enough for us to save taylor and kill everyone around her which would win the game if she's town. who do you think is scum rn? what do you think we should do?
i don't want to end the game until ydrasse catches up so she has fun too
And fyi @Dru by your logic, you would actually have to be scum here, because I feel extremely demoralized by you right now because absolutely nothing in any of my ISO/voting patterns/Pooky interactions points even remotely to my being scum and why tf do you honestly think I shouldn’t care that you’re blithely confibiasing me despite all of that? Why the he’ll wouldn’t anyone be beyond frustrated by that?In post 1885, Loki Dokie wrote:I have all fucking night. And I can post this as much as you continue to wrongly call me scum, just because you’re pissed at me now.In post 1880, Loki Dokie wrote:Okay @drusilla, reread any/preferrably ALL of my ISO/voting patterns/interactions with Pooky and tell me which points to my being scum - I mean other than the fact you obviously don’t like me very much right now. I’ll wait,
I’m not having fun and it’s a damn shame too, because I totally was before scum put me in one of the unconfirmed spots and I - despite every godddamn thing in my freaking ISO/voting patterns/interactions with Pooky are so obviously beyond bleeding obvtown, I’m seriously pissed. I don’t think there’s a game anywhere in existence where I’ve been more super obvtown than this and STILL being wrongly scumread. I wish I was because if I actually was scum here, I wouldn’t subject myself to another second of this bullshit but I’m not and I don’t want to gamethrow.In post 1884, Kanna wrote:@ydrasse; wrt 1830, i don't think it's very likely scum bus like this when they're not in danger/there's no need to, and so comfortably too. it looks to me like pooky found something everyone else was pushing and wanted to take advantage of the situationIn post 1834, Ydrasse wrote:...okay but i literally just played a game where i was willing to like. go to the death against my partner. we did not coordinate it but it still happened like that.
if we have confirmation that scum didn't have a chance to talk i will feel more comfortable accepting that case as it is but even in the absence of any sort of day-talking it can still happen.
p-edit: ...
my point about the deadline hammer is that scum!taylor had no reason to not fake being afk and letting the timer run out. this would result in a no-lunch and scum can execute isis.
i think those 2 points are good enough for us to save taylor and kill everyone around her which would win the game if she's town. who do you think is scum rn? what do you think we should do?
i don't want to end the game until ydrasse catches up so she has fun too
I’m never this agressive when I’m scum because I lack the conviction that I do especially when I know that nothing I’ve posted, voting patterns, Pooky interactions make an iota of sense if I’m scum here, which is why I’m so pissed.In post 1886, Ydrasse wrote:i... guess so? i'm probably pushing my own experiences on this game but even if there's no reason to you still can? i know i am the ass in this situation not rereading and just acting in the moment but gah.In post 1884, Kanna wrote:@ydrasse; wrt 1830, i don't think it's very likely scum bus like this when they're not in danger/there's no need to, and so comfortably too. it looks to me like pooky found something everyone else was pushing and wanted to take advantage of the situationIn post 1834, Ydrasse wrote:...okay but i literally just played a game where i was willing to like. go to the death against my partner. we did not coordinate it but it still happened like that.
if we have confirmation that scum didn't have a chance to talk i will feel more comfortable accepting that case as it is but even in the absence of any sort of day-talking it can still happen.
p-edit: ...
my point about the deadline hammer is that scum!taylor had no reason to not fake being afk and letting the timer run out. this would result in a no-lunch and scum can execute isis.
i think those 2 points are good enough for us to save taylor and kill everyone around her which would win the game if she's town. who do you think is scum rn? what do you think we should do?
i don't want to end the game until ydrasse catches up so she has fun too
the safest way to vote right now is n_m, probably; he was prodded but i dunno if we'll get much from him regardless. uh. from there i would be lying if i said i felt completely comfortable self-voting myself. i get the idea behind it especially from the eyes of the confirmed of the odds being better to vote here, but to me it's 33% across the board and i don't think that everything that's happened confirms taylor as town. loki is... being very stubborn though, about this, and i get it because i have the same frustrations of being in the unconfirmed pair and to me it also feels like we're being set up but it's very... aggressive right now.
i don't have a good answer for you really other than i think that, to me, it makes sense to start with nm if he doesn't show up/say much and go from there.
She’s saying that makes me scum and I’m not.In post 1890, Isis wrote:I think drusilla is probably naked quoting because you've fallen below standards for decency and mutual respect to the point it's not exactly fair to expect thorough responses.
You seem at least half aware of being toxic which is an improvement over truly oblivious players but it'd be much better if you stopped.
There's no misread in any setup that deprives any player of the right to be respected, even if you scumread Mother Theresa.
@Isis, please be fair here, how is she deliberately not baiting me with this? Tell me that she’s not trying to deliberately provoke me here?In post 1878, drusilla wrote:In post 1875, drusilla wrote:In post 1103, Alisae wrote:@Bugs if you feel demoralized because of a certain player, that player is scum.
Period.
End of discussion.
In post 1802, Isis wrote:Ydrasse hasn't made a post that's fully cognizant of the gamestate in like a week
VOTE: ydrasse
c:In post 1810, Isis wrote:yes but I think if I revote plusJOYED might quote it and vote and then I get to see his chipper faceIn post 1808, Loki Dokie wrote:Didn’t you already vote her? You need one of me/Ydrasse/NM for the hammer, right?
Not everything I do is for wincon.
the lower the percentage of your play that's for wincon, the more fun you have
What makes you think that this is a condemnation and not an execution?In post 1897, PlusJOYED wrote:one wacky idea i have is letting maf choose the first condemnation for analysis
but that's probably bad idea
im a lil sus of loki atm but that's all gut