Page 76 of 175
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 8:43 am
by notscience
In post 122, notscience wrote:Something something track record of low availability sundays something
Beetle juice something
I have to put in my truck order then drive home.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 8:46 am
by Infinity 324
Iverson feels towny
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 8:49 am
by Iverson
1. It's Monday
2. Still haven't been thinking about the game
3. Doesn't explain the Cakez vote or not trying to sort NM
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 8:52 am
by Iverson
There isn't even a more explicit statement like "I'm waiting for Mena/want to confer with Mena", just whoops here's a Cakez vote and let's ignore the weird AF NM interactions entirely
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 8:55 am
by notscience
1) and I’ve been at work most of the day too
2) I have been at work for majority of the night and people here can confirm that’s just how my schedule is
3) why not means I don’t see a reason not to atm? His vote was a pure sheep off mine when I told him he could Jill me today if I’m wrong and I’m noticing a lack of trying to kill me. You can’t engage notmaf through traditional means and I’m letting him do his own thing so i can read him. And besides, if I was still scumreading him why the fuck would I try to start a counterwagob
Ninja-
All menas done is enjoy elimming notmaf bc it’s a policy thing and I’m not voting for policy I’m voting people I scumread lmao
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:00 am
by Iverson
I find it very, very hard to believe that the best guess you have on Cakez 75 pages into the game is "I don't see a reason not to", and even harder to believe that you got anything from the latest NM interactions (you're welcome for doing the heavy lifting, btw) only to not comment on it. I don't even understand what the claim about Mena here is suppoesd to be in light of daystart.
Absolutely fine voting this slot.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:02 am
by Iverson
...Am I supposed to interpret this as you having an active scumread on Cakez with the reason being "why not"? Like what are you even doing dude
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:03 am
by Iverson
There's something in there about Cakez not trying to kill you, so push for an explanation if you scumread that, Christ.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:14 am
by Iverson
VOTE: notscience
Open to either this or NM but I want to see where this goes. I'll stop castigating him for a few hours and let others jump in but I am not thrilled.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:26 am
by SirCakez
Notsci going after me after BEGGING me to vote Nacho yesterday is ????
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:55 am
by notscience
I don’t really expect to get listened to this day phase
My role this day phase is that crazy uncle you try to rope in at the last minute
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:56 am
by Disaster Cartel
Iverson have we played together before?
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:56 am
by Disaster Cartel
-M
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:57 am
by fferyllt
I just noticed I missed this question. Sorry about that! They're all images that come up in searches with deja vu-related search terms. There's a little more method (or madness) to the images, which may become evident over the course of the game.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:57 am
by Disaster Cartel
Oh cool, I get it now, thanks!
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:59 am
by Disaster Cartel
In post 1883, Iverson wrote:VOTE: notscience
Open to either this or NM but I want to see where this goes. I'll stop castigating him for a few hours and let others jump in but I am not thrilled.
You should catch up first, I think noddy was p towny in his initial interactions with me and I still think his nacho vote felt like a more sincere take than like cakez/your slot’s/mom’s
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 10:00 am
by Disaster Cartel
In post 1879, notscience wrote:All menas done is enjoy elimming notmaf bc it’s a policy thing and I’m not voting for policy I’m voting people I scumread lmao
Why are you scumreading N_M and why are you not voting him anymore
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 10:01 am
by notscience
I was scumreading him for his piss poor day one. I figured it was either “he’s mad I said I could read him” or “he’s scum”
I’m not scumreading him now because he’s tryharding
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 10:02 am
by Disaster Cartel
I think that cakez and NM read partnery on the last page with the 1855-1857 and I think N_M’s 1870 reads as insincere given that we really haven’t had that many rep ins this game
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 10:03 am
by Disaster Cartel
(1) I don’t think he’s tryharding compared to what he’s capable of and (2) isn’t your vote meant to be mine for the day?
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 10:04 am
by notscience
You never agreed first off I was just being nice
And are you scumreading or policying? I’m not voting policy.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 10:04 am
by SirCakez
In post 1894, Disaster Cartel wrote:(1) I don’t think he’s tryharding compared to what he’s capable of and (2) isn’t your vote meant to be mine for the day?
What is NM even capable of? This is possibly the most I've ever seen out of him.
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 10:06 am
by Disaster Cartel
In post 1896, SirCakez wrote: In post 1894, Disaster Cartel wrote:(1) I don’t think he’s tryharding compared to what he’s capable of and (2) isn’t your vote meant to be mine for the day?
What is NM even capable of? This is possibly the most I've ever seen out of him.
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=84282
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 10:08 am
by Disaster Cartel
In post 1895, notscience wrote:You never agreed first off I was just being nice
And are you scumreading or policying? I’m not voting policy.
Oh shit I thought I did after your entry today
I’m SRing at this point
I have enough TRs/TLs, I think the resistance to the wagon yesterday when I know the main pushers were 2 town is strongly indicative, and I think he has excellent equity with my other SRs (like cakez)
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2021 10:09 am
by Iverson
I'm sorry, you think "the three people shoving me are scum" with no reasoning is tryharding?
Mena, no clue, if we have it was not memorable.