Mafiascum.net

In post 1871, Datisi wrote:

In post 1863, Iconeum wrote:VOTE: T3
maybe this is the spicey wagon this game needs

ico pls
why not t3-t
why is three town

In post 1875, Wiki wrote:He is playing a role, faking, this is not a real thinking

In post 1873, Iconeum wrote:we cracked him open real good, made him squeeeeeze under our boots yeah?

In post 200, Three wrote:

In post 198, Selynee wrote:

In post 197, Three wrote:

In post 179, Gamma Emerald wrote:anyway can some more people towntell pls

Ok.

VOTE: Gamma

Serious vote?

Perhaps.

I don't see why town would beg for more people to town tell on page 8, but maybe that's just me.

In post 210, Three wrote:Or...explain your scum read. You can't say "I'll explain later." as if you have to leave but then still keep posting. Also, where's your vote?

In post 242, Three wrote:

In post 223, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 200, Three wrote:I don't see why town would beg for more people to town tell on page 8, but maybe that's just me.

why would scum do it either lol
as for why I said that, I'm trying to use my new just-about-norm strat of townblocking slots early, forming a PoE based on those TRs, and crushing the scumteam beneath my bootheels. The faster I can get at least 50% of players into my townblock, the faster I can start applying pressure to a PoE solve. I'll be honest that I

do not

expect my townblock to be solid initially, 4 scum means there's more chances for someone to take the Cabd Clause ticket, but I also think that also means there's more chances for scum to underperform

A possible scum motivation is to just simply look busy while saying townie things. I think if you want someone to town tell you'll need to drag it out of them, otherwise it's pretty easy to fake a town tell if you're just offering it up yourself as opposed to town telling through genuine reactions.

I do think your strat sounds effective though, which I think is a bit +town.

In post 340, Three wrote:

In post 329, Andresvmb wrote: @Three, OMGUS doesn’t say shit about someone’s alignment btw. Town sometimes just get frustrated and vote back thinking they’re being attacked by Scum. But I do SR Selynee’s timidity and somewhat narrow focus on your slot.

I don't disagree. The OMGUS doesn't mean as much to me as the rest of her post IMO. It reads like she's trying to scare me off her wagon by acting like she was on the verge of being flipped when she wasn't anywhere close to it. The fact that she's already worried about getting eliminated suggests self-conscious scum to me, like she's mad that she's already been caught over something small and trivial.

If she's genuinely frustrated town, she needs to deal with the people casing her, not attack people who are convinced by those casing her.

In post 519, Three wrote:

In post 511, Selynee wrote:Why not? I mean, feel free to share.

The lack of aggression here is telling.

In post 746, Three wrote:

In post 739, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 732, Selynee wrote:

In post 723, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 716, Iconeum wrote:

In post 709, Salsabil Faria wrote:I don't see the obvious A50 town thing ico.

okay, so sell me on scum!A50? i don't see it

In my pervious games with them, they were more active as town. I don’t have scum meta on them though but they're lurking for some reason and the self vote is weird.

Meh, I think they don't really enjoy this game. Seemed like they were looking for some reactions to their self-vote, though not pushing a lot there...

Hmm can be, who do you propose to vote instead?

This feels pretty scum indicative. I don't know how you could be so lost on who to vote for that you need someone to tell you who to vote.

VOTE: Salsa

In post 1209, Three wrote:

In post 1097, Datisi wrote:i'm gonna shorten my response to 1012 because this game is already giving me a headache due to wiki and it's not worth it

i am disagreeing with you? or rather i'm calling you out for falsely saying i have a "contradiction" going. like, 740 asks how i can think a post she made made sense while still thinking it's scummy. i can think both, because scum sometimes tells the truth. she was telling the truth about never claiming there was scum between dwlee/wiki. that doesn't make her town.

i'm not quoting word for word (and am rather carrying over the meaning) because it's easier to make my point that way. like it seemed obvious to me that "cuz i'm mafia pushing you?" was said in a "is this not what you're thinking right now?" context.

and it's called hyperbole. yes, you obviously didn't have literally zero reads and takes this whole game. the intended meaning was always "i think you've given too little content for how you've been active", like i think it was kinda understood to mean that?

You're making it really obvious that you just don't want to admit you were wrong. Whatever.

In post 1210, Three wrote:

In post 1097, Datisi wrote:i'm gonna shorten my response to 1012 because this game is already giving me a headache due to wiki and it's not worth it

i am disagreeing with you? or rather i'm calling you out for falsely saying i have a "contradiction" going. like, 740 asks how i can think a post she made made sense while still thinking it's scummy. i can think both, because scum sometimes tells the truth. she was telling the truth about never claiming there was scum between dwlee/wiki. that doesn't make her town.

i'm not quoting word for word (and am rather carrying over the meaning) because it's easier to make my point that way. like it seemed obvious to me that "cuz i'm mafia pushing you?" was said in a "is this not what you're thinking right now?" context.

and it's called hyperbole. yes, you obviously didn't have literally zero reads and takes this whole game. the intended meaning was always "i think you've given too little content for how you've been active", like i think it was kinda understood to mean that?

In post 1169, T3 wrote:

In post 1011, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 992, Almost50 wrote:

In post 988, Dwlee99 wrote:A50 why not salsa

I dunno. She tried to pocket me, didn't she? I'm glad to accept that pocket for today.

Yeah, pocket the person who also in people’s suspect list..

>_>

that's like the entire point of whiteknighting

THANK YOU. Holy shit, I feel like I'm losing my mind.

In post 1214, Three wrote:I'm not sure why people suddenly piled their votes onto Dorsey.

In post 1449, Three wrote:

In post 1436, Iconeum wrote:A50 can easily be either allignment here
same goes for GE i think

Oh wait, forgot I'm damn near town locking A50. He just has close to no WIM this game, at least so far.

In post 1729, Three wrote:

In post 1728, Datisi wrote:three's read on me is utter bullshit because he's been called out by multiple people as misrepping, which means that maybe, *maybe* your posts are fucking confusing and it's not the rest of us that are wrong

rn i'm leaning on it being town bullshit

but it's bullshit nonetheless

Dude can you literally talk about anything other than a post from a fucking week ago? You're so focused on something that doesn't matter and you refuse to actually try to solve me. I'm trying to figure you out and you don't even acknowledge it.

Also "called out by multiple people" you mean you, who I scum read? Salsa, who I scum read and who also LIED about the misrep? Lmao. Sel is the only other one and it got clarified a week ago that what I said wasn't a misrep, it was a misunderstanding. Get the fuck over it and play the game or get limmed.

In post 1883, T3 wrote:Many people have said that A50 having low WIM is a scumtell.

In post 1876, Iconeum wrote:

In post 1871, Datisi wrote:

In post 1863, Iconeum wrote:VOTE: T3
maybe this is the spicey wagon this game needs

ico pls
why not t3-t
why is three town

VOTE: three

sure
works as well

In post 1788, Iconeum wrote:i fee like Three v Datisi is more misunderstanding and frustration then anything else

In post 1876, Iconeum wrote:VOTE: three

sure
works as well

In post 1884, Almost50 wrote:I'm back.. still nervous.. maybe i should take a cold shower to ease my nervousness??

In post 1888, Datisi wrote:

In post 1876, Iconeum wrote:

In post 1871, Datisi wrote:

In post 1863, Iconeum wrote:VOTE: T3
maybe this is the spicey wagon this game needs

ico pls
why not t3-t
why is three town

VOTE: three

sure
works as well

earlier today you said you thought it was a misunderstanding btwn the two of us
now you're voting there
why?

In post 1894, Dorsey wrote:Wow, an explosion of posts and wagon shifts to protect Datisi. That was quick. VOTE: Datisi

I jump off A50 and now all of a sudden he's scum. Datisi is the manipulator. He's also the one calling people "fucking morons" and "purposefully ignorant".