Mafiascum.net

In post 1900, Jake from State Farm wrote:

unvote

Why?

(Also, you weren't actually voting Majiffy before this so he was at L-1 the entire time)

In post 1899, Jake from State Farm wrote:

In post 1898, ArcAngel9 wrote:Jake, any inputs about my post # 1892

1892 is my post

huh
I mean 1896

I didn't know who I was voting for actually

In post 1901, Selkies wrote:

In post 1900, Jake from State Farm wrote:

unvote

Why?

(Also, you weren't actually voting Majiffy before this so he was at L-2 the entire time)

Fixed

yeah, we have a direct CC of AA and Jennifer so as much as I want to lynch Jiffy, we lynch one of the CC's

In post 1904, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:

In post 1901, Selkies wrote:

In post 1900, Jake from State Farm wrote:

unvote

Why?

(Also, you weren't actually voting Majiffy before this so he was at L-2 the entire time)

Fixed

cmon, stop posting on the wrong account.

huh what?? who is CCing Jens (mafia) Watcher claim?

In post 1905, Jake from State Farm wrote:yeah, we have a direct CC of AA and Jennifer so as much as I want to lynch Jiffy, we lynch one of the CC's

Do you think you can keep Rach from succumbing to the scum siren call on day 4? Because it will be up to you. And who knows what AA will decide to do.

^^ -f

In post 1897, Selkies wrote:Because, AA9, Majiffy is an excellent scum player and I don't want him to make Rach get cold feet. I don't want him to talk his way out of it. Jennifer can't, she's a less dangerous scum player.

we're lynching Majiffy while we're sitl around to lead the lynch

I don't like giving compliments to majiffy but yeah he is bit bad ass player
but think about this.. We are taking a player down over a confirmed player. i am trying to do what best for us so that we could secure our win. I dont want to loose this game.

In post 1908, Selkies wrote:

In post 1905, Jake from State Farm wrote:yeah, we have a direct CC of AA and Jennifer so as much as I want to lynch Jiffy, we lynch one of the CC's

Do you think you can keep Rach from succumbing to the scum siren call on day 4? Because it will be up to you. And who knows what AA will decide to do.

Fferyl
I have handled these type of situations before, they seem too easy but they're not. It is viable that we all stand one decision and Jen is the best and safe lynch for today. Let's not risk a lynch when are not 100 % sure about it.

In post 1907, RachMarie wrote:huh what?? who is CCing Jens (mafia) Watcher claim?

jen is basically saying AA9's claim is bullshit. That's is essentially a cc even though the roles are different.

And its not like the last scum would kill all of us, only one of us will die, which give us more to understand the game, less room to get the last scum.

In post 1912, Jake from State Farm wrote:

In post 1907, RachMarie wrote:huh what?? who is CCing Jens (mafia) Watcher claim?

jen is basically saying AA9's claim is bullshit. That's is essentially a cc even though the roles are different.

Btw, Rach if you're confused with what CCmeans.. CC- Counter Claim

hold up, I need to read something real fast

PEOPLE.

It doesn't matter if we mislynch today or tomorrow. We lose either way.

I am NOT letting Majiffy go to see tomorrow because he is a good player and I do not have sufficient trust in your ability to listen to us and lynch Majiffy.

Majiffy/Jen is the team, and they go IN THAT ORDER.

AA9, your argument doesn't make sense. Jen is confscum, sure. But we're not lynching her because I do not have sufficient trust in your ability to lynch Majiffy.

Tell me, could you be swayed to lynch someone else other than Majiffy tomorrow?
If yes: Then we're lynching Majiffy today so you don't mislynch tomorrow.
If no: Then what fucking matter is it to you if we lynch Majiffy or Jen today

In post 1916, Selkies wrote:

Tell me, could you be swayed to lynch someone else other than Majiffy tomorrow?
If yes: Then we're lynching Majiffy today so you don't mislynch tomorrow.
If no: Then what fucking matter is it to you if we lynch Majiffy or Jen today

Bolding for posterity.

AA9 - if you protected Selkies and we had a NK last night, why would you think that Selkies was scum? Wouldn't you think your BG stopped the kill?

I know that but what did you claim Arc?

Keep in mind my mind is a tad fuzzy it is almost 6 AM here in CA and I have a doc appt this afternoon for my ear infection

wait a min Arc is a bodyguard?

Shouldnt she have died then? I thought they die when they protect someone, unlike Doc?

In post 1918, Jake from State Farm wrote:AA9 - if you protected Selkies and we had a NK last night, why would you think that Selkies was scum? Wouldn't you think your BG stopped the kill?

Because she subscribes to your screwed up philosophy of "lynch all liars". This is very hypocritical.

In post 1920, RachMarie wrote:wait a min Arc is a bodyguard?

Shouldnt she have died then? I thought they die when they protect someone, unlike Doc?

yeah that too. Bodyguard DOES die which means

I WAS THE NK TARGET LAST NIGHT!!!!!!!!!

ROFL - Majiffy - I want you in here to eat some crow

hey Majiffy

this one's for you

ORC or Ffery

Please sow down and Listen to us, Majiffy is a bad ass player, I see what you saying. I would also prefer taking Majiffy down over Jen but at this moment what I feel is best for this game is to take Jen down and majiffy later becuz Jen CC'd and given herself out as confirmed scum player where as majiffy didn't, so there is slightest possibility (even 1%) that majiffy may not be with jen, we don't know for certain, at least not the way we know it as Jen, so by saying that, It is more viable to take the confirmed scum than a scum who we caught based on reads and assumptions.

i am not trying to win this argument, i am only trying to do what's best for this game so that we could secure our win.