Mafiascum.net

In post 1899, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Post 568 is me saying I had a gut scum read on you and would wagon you.

In post 1897, Ythan wrote:

In post 1893, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Ythan is trying to look busy. He's not scumhunting because he's scum.

I'm hoping this is Tammy because I enjoyed Mina's company too much to reconcile with the disdain I feel for your play.

In post 1896, Untrod Tripod wrote:hey waffles

not all conversation is explicit

you gotta read between |you implied ittttttttttttttttt| the linesssssssssssssss

In post 1904, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:

In post 1896, Untrod Tripod wrote:hey waffles

not all conversation is explicit

you gotta read between |you implied ittttttttttttttttt| the linesssssssssssssss

I very explicitly said I'm perfectly fine with a VIG shot on us. I'm not scared. I don't care. Invitation completely open.

In post 1902, Ythan wrote:"I said you were scum yesterday."
"Yeah you wanna show me again?"
"Yeah remember I said gut." GAME SET MATCH garbage mafia player

In post 1877, EagleKit wrote:

In post 1874, Malakittens wrote:So ehm I managed to forget the eagle kit password and since I'm phone posting it doesn't save and I moved my email to desp somewhere with the password. When I'm home ill quote this on my hydra (sorry!). Also I'm convinced I have too many hydras because I'm forgetting passwords left and right.

@Mollie: what exactly put us back to scum read? Was it me agreeing with Desperado about his scum read on you?

Also you do have a good point about CD. Something feels off about him over the last two games I played with him. I need to pinpoint that more than gut at this point.

@Gamma: want to explain that because its like wtf. You don't like the wagons okay, but do you know your vote on us is just a singleton and you aren't really doing much to push us. It's looks like a scum placing a safe vote, tbh.

Quoted for hydra purposes.

Axxle that's probably a good idea. Maybe ill do it after work.

In post 1722, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Ythan, I cannot BEGIN to describe how pissed off I am with you right now. So in case you're not bluffing, I just want to tell you in advance...if you vig us and we die, ignore our breadcrumb. (I won't even bother arguing with you not to vig us, because I can just guess how well that will end.) The "modified" part of the hider means there's a very real chance your shot will actually hit us. There's a reason that when I claimed, I was so insistent that you don't treat our breadcrumb as gospel if we're the only death tonight.

I would much rather say this now than have it lead to a clusterfuck later on.

In post 1904, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:

In post 1896, Untrod Tripod wrote:hey waffles

not all conversation is explicit

you gotta read between |you implied ittttttttttttttttt| the linesssssssssssssss

I very explicitly said I'm perfectly fine with a VIG shot on us. I'm not scared. I don't care. Invitation completely open.

In post 1722, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Ythan, I cannot BEGIN to describe how pissed off I am with you right now. So in case you're not bluffing, I just want to tell you in advance...if you vig us and we die, ignore our breadcrumb. (I won't even bother arguing with you not to vig us, because I can just guess how well that will end.) The "modified" part of the hider means there's a very real chance your shot will actually hit us. There's a reason that when I claimed, I was so insistent that you don't treat our breadcrumb as gospel if we're the only death tonight.

I would much rather say this now than have it lead to a clusterfuck later on.

In post 1904, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:

In post 1896, Untrod Tripod wrote:hey waffles

not all conversation is explicit

you gotta read between |you implied ittttttttttttttttt| the linesssssssssssssss

I very explicitly said I'm perfectly fine with a VIG shot on us. I'm not scared. I don't care. Invitation completely open.

In post 1812, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Hey UT - Point out where we begged the vig not to shoot us? Go on, I'll wait. Cuz what Mina *did* say was that if we do die, and the vig claims to have shot us, then ignore our crumb. Because we uh claimed modified hider for a reason, you know.

Also, totes love how Fate keeps peddling we could be scum and ignoring that Faraday is calling us Town. durr hurr burr

Quite frankly, I couldn't care less if the vig shoots us. I'm over this game, and since we're using our hider shot as investigative and going after a suspect, we don't really expect to be alive tomorrow anyway.

Also, love that no one is considering the possibility of ythan being a scum vig. Like his play makes no sense for town, but whatevs.

In post 1878, InflatablePie wrote:have you actually read my posts (no one does and since you ignored the last thing I phrased at you...) and/or seen me play in large games

this is leaps and bounds above my usual efforts so stfu

In post 1920, Fate wrote:oh wait


my god is waffles ALTERING their hider claim??

LOL


BELIEVE ME YET FARADAY