Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:17 am
This game is fucking stupid because if people don't understand something they auto scum read it to help there egos.
It was a start of a scumread based on you defending her hardcore when she had a wagon her. So yes, it was associative, and so I don't count it because I can see how dumb that was. If you want to count it like that, that's fine, but it doesn't really matter.In post 1899, TierShift wrote:You voted texcat so that was the start of a scumread. And that was purely based on associatives?
what do you think of tex hoping on the first counter wagon she could find, and not previously fosing me at all.In post 1899, TierShift wrote:You voted texcat so that was the start of a scumread. And that was purely based on associatives?
dude you're wrong, i'm not even lying to you. and if you're putting on a fake charade as mafia then that's even more pathetic.In post 1901, xSoniaNevermindx wrote:When gerry is lynched I want a fucking sorry from half of you assholes.
CAN YOU SRSLY FKING STOP-In post 1904, TierShift wrote:Ok saru glad you're not teying to defend it
Sonia you annoy people with your spamposting and this is what happens so stop whining
Did you read 1858 where I laid out the reasons for voting Gerry? Gerry was hiding most of yesterday. It wasn't until he did something really scummy like try to get me hammered in the middle of the night that I wanted to vote him.In post 1898, Saru wrote:Honestly, I didn't really feel Tex was actually scum up until she voted Gerry. She had no reasons of her own, and only quoted BlackStar. Mooching off other people's reasons for her SR is what she's been doing for a while now.In post 1884, TierShift wrote:Saru why did you originally scumread tex because I don't understand
My scum read of her and you combined was dumb imo and I'm not counting that as the start of my SR of her, fyi.
You're not giving any reason other than her sheeping me earlier. You just keep repeating that over and over. Do you have any other reasons for scum reading her? And the quality of her posts has gone up since she voted youIn post 1917, gerryoat wrote:BlackStar. You literally said you fos'd tex. why is it scummy for me trying to get your fos hammered?
No. If scum does that, they end up scum claiming. That wouldn't work as a strategy on D1 or even D2 for that matter.In post 1918, texcat wrote:Hammering without intent and a chance to claim is what SCUM does.
People usually see it as too scummy to be scummyIn post 1922, Saru wrote:No. If scum does that, they end up scum claiming. That wouldn't work as a strategy on D1 or even D2 for that matter.In post 1918, texcat wrote:Hammering without intent and a chance to claim is what SCUM does.
Sometimes sure. But, for the most part, those who do it end up doing it still get lynched. Point is: it's too risky. I just don't see scum doing it.In post 1923, BlackStar wrote:People usually see it as too scummy to be scummyIn post 1922, Saru wrote:No. If scum does that, they end up scum claiming. That wouldn't work as a strategy on D1 or even D2 for that matter.In post 1918, texcat wrote:Hammering without intent and a chance to claim is what SCUM does.