Page 77 of 103

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:36 pm
by Katsuki
THE PROCEDURE OF THIS DAY IS SIMPLE FOR MY FELLOW TOWNIES

>POWERLYNCH GINNGIE WITH GREAT JUSTICE
>IF SCUM, GAME IS WON WE PROCEED WITH ANK/DUNSTRALL
>IF TOWN, I GET VIGGED/POWERLYNCHED D3

Wisdom will do his best to derail this scum lynch with some innane thought like "Katsuki is fakeclaiming guilty D2 with no flipped scum on a player not named Wisdom because Katsuki is a VI". The rest of you must stand strong in lynching scum without giving her any chance of wiggling out of it with her whispers of sweet nothings while scumbuddies ank and dunnstral try their hardest to stall and redirect.

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:36 pm
by Kaede Akamatsu
In post 1899, Ginngie wrote:
In post 1896, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Meanwhile we still don't know why you checked mastina Ginngie.
Do you want me to answer this?

Get Katsuki to entertain me
That's not how this works.

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:37 pm
by Ginngie
In post 1898, Brian Skies wrote:Silly Ginngie, questions don't have any gravitational pull.
Actually you could make an argument that it does

In order to produce thought, you have to fire a bunch of connections in your head, those neurons have matter, and all matter, no matter the size, has gravity.

So thoughts do have gravity

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:38 pm
by Ginngie
In post 1901, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:
In post 1899, Ginngie wrote:
In post 1896, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Meanwhile we still don't know why you checked mastina Ginngie.
Do you want me to answer this?

Get Katsuki to entertain me
That's not how this works.
Would you be surprised if I told you it actually is.

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:39 pm
by Kaede Akamatsu
Some people have commented it's weird for you to target mastina.
You come in and instead of telling us why you come with this question towards Katsuki
(Granted I wanted to see what the question was all about but w/e)
Why?

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:39 pm
by Kaede Akamatsu
Are you implying that the question you're asking Katsuki is relevant to the reason you targeted mastina?

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:40 pm
by Ginngie
EVERYTHING IS ANSWERED IF KATSUKI ANSWERS THE QUESTION

I LITERALLY PROMISE YOU THE QUESTION, AND THEREFORE THE ANSWER KATSUKI GIVES

ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION

P-EDIT:

PLZ READ ABOVE

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:48 pm
by Kaede Akamatsu
There's no need to yell.
But fine i'll stop asking i'll just keep my vote where it is then.

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:48 pm
by Ginngie
I haven't yelled in ages

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:51 pm
by Kaede Akamatsu
In post 1907, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:There's no need to CAPSRAGE.
But fine i'll stop asking i'll just keep my vote where it is then.
Fixed

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:00 pm
by Kokichi Oma
VOTE: gin

vig wisdom/kaede

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:01 pm
by Ginngie
Are you fucking joking.

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:30 pm
by Ankamius
In post 1695, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Well good news im still a vanilla cop.
I'm quite interested in knowing if someone got vanillized since if no one did, then scum probably doesnt have one and will mean that my role isnt as useful as I thought.
Ftr, last night i investigated grapes since they were the only other PR that was outed together with me and I figured if scum vanillized them instead of me for some reason could help confirm that they were the target of a scum attack, which would be almost like an inno. I initially thought of scanning mastina for the same reason, but after deliberation if scum does have a vanillizer they would target the vanilla cops first, since mastina's IC if real doesnt trigger for another day anyways.

Considering im fine and grapes is fine, im starting to believe it's possible they just flat out dont have one.
This isn't necessarily true, but it's unlikely that it wouldn't be claimed by now anyways so the conclusion is probably still correct.

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:31 pm
by Ankamius
In post 1698, Kokichi Oma wrote:Stupid lunch. We should have got Kaede. VOTE: Kaede this is scum
In post 1699, Kokichi Oma wrote:She vanilla copped her cc. Hahahaha
That isn't scummy and Kaede actually isn't scum.

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:39 pm
by Ankamius
In post 1700, Katsuki wrote:How interesting, it seems FG is now a fan of Amnesiac roles.

I received a PM stating that Ginngie and Ginngie alone visited muffins last night.


I'm pretty our watcher role does not need to claim today.

VOTE: GINNGIE
This is almost 100% a gambit.

I believe Katsuki is well able to gambit as both alignments just based on my personality read of him.

Katsuki-town saw the Muffin kill and decided to fakeclaim a guilty in order to sheep his reads.
Katsuki-scum wanted to gambit to get free kills; this would mean that town overall was probably in a pretty good spot reads-wise despite the mislynch D1.

Plus, the role being claimed feels out of place in this setup.

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:44 pm
by Ankamius
In post 1717, Katsuki wrote:Who knows.

Either way, it makes far more sense to vig someone hard to lynch whom muffins was hard reading as scum last night when we were chatting than to waste it on an easy lynch target. Plus, if I die overnight, I have 0 faith in you guys lynching Wisdom ever.
Another possible indicator that this was very much planned with a Katsuki-scum game.

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:45 pm
by Ankamius
In post 1720, Purrcocet wrote:my pool is like andriod nos

ill just let u guys lynch wisdom if u really want to there were like 3 wisdom wagons yday but i think hes town



Brian Skies wrote:If Ginngie flips scum, Ank would also be an okay vig target.
:cat:
I'm not really reading Andriod in either direction right now, but Nosferatu is 100% a great shot, no matter what happens today.

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:46 pm
by Ankamius
In post 1729, Purrcocet wrote:why is human sequencer town
Dunnstral wrote:UNVOTE: Ginngie

We can slow down for a minute actually

I don't understand people calling for an andriod vig, or wh y people think there is a vig after 1 kill
read: im scum with andriod
That's not a good associative.

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:49 pm
by Ankamius
In post 1734, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 1732, Ankamius wrote:It's blatantly a gambit that is getting scum-sheeped
especially since i visited muffin last night
This isn't the scumclaim I thought it was, but I still think this slot is very likely scum mainly because of tone.

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:52 pm
by Ankamius
In post 1731, Ankamius wrote:Can you guys chill until I get home please
In post 1732, Ankamius wrote:
In post 1730, Wisdom wrote:katsuki's claim looks like a gambit at first glance

I might be biased due to last game tho
It's blatantly a gambit that is getting scum-sheeped
In post 1735, Brian Skies wrote:I don't actually care about Katsuki's claim.

Also, Ank is still trying to hard-defend Ginngie, which I find hilarious.
Brian is a great vig too, this misrep is awful.

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:55 pm
by Brian Skies
In post 1919, Ankamius wrote:
In post 1731, Ankamius wrote:Can you guys chill until I get home please
In post 1732, Ankamius wrote:
In post 1730, Wisdom wrote:katsuki's claim looks like a gambit at first glance

I might be biased due to last game tho
It's blatantly a gambit that is getting scum-sheeped
In post 1735, Brian Skies wrote:I don't actually care about Katsuki's claim.

Also, Ank is still trying to hard-defend Ginngie, which I find hilarious.
Brian is a great vig too, this misrep is awful.
Oh please, you and I both know that you don't make 1732 unless your intention was to derail the Ginngie wagon.

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:56 pm
by Ankamius
In post 1740, Katsuki wrote:OK YA I WAS PERFECTLY OK WITH ANK BEING VIGGED BUT THIS SCUMCLAIM LMAO

I DIDNT DEFEND IT AFTER GOING THRU THAT ANK ISO
YOU WERE 100% RIGHT BS
lol

Show me how that's a scumclaim

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:58 pm
by Ankamius
In post 1920, Brian Skies wrote:
In post 1919, Ankamius wrote:
In post 1731, Ankamius wrote:Can you guys chill until I get home please
In post 1732, Ankamius wrote:
In post 1730, Wisdom wrote:katsuki's claim looks like a gambit at first glance

I might be biased due to last game tho
It's blatantly a gambit that is getting scum-sheeped
In post 1735, Brian Skies wrote:I don't actually care about Katsuki's claim.

Also, Ank is still trying to hard-defend Ginngie, which I find hilarious.
Brian is a great vig too, this misrep is awful.
Oh please, you and I both know that you don't make 1732 unless your intention was to derail the Ginngie wagon.
well

you're using meta as a case against me, so you should be able to figure out why that's town if you use it properly

I'll give you a hint:

(I don't try to derail the Ginngie wagon as scum. Maaaaaaaaaaybe if Ginngie was town, but not if Ginngie is also scum)

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:59 pm
by Ankamius
or just be scum

that works too

Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 4:01 pm
by Ankamius
In post 1789, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Here i spent all of D1 (not really) trying to figure out if her (Ank's) SR on me was sincere or not, hence some of my interactions with her (I mean i even had a reach out that she ignored FFS), and I was thinking that maybe she was just bad at reading me like Wisdom admitted to yesterday...

Now i feel like an idiot. Maybe in the end im just too trusting.
What reach out? If it was after my reads shifted, then that's probably why.