Mafiascum.net

I am incredibly confused about that last series of posts

votecount

With 17 alive it takes 9 to lynch.

TPFKAP (6):	Thor665 (1275),	Gamma Emerald (1595),	Elsa Jay (1749),	CheekyTeeky (1787),	BuJaber (1807),	Jingle (1835),
BuJaber (5):	McMenno (881),	Chickadee (1607),	Chara (1757),	Toogeloo (1870),	TPFKAP (1888),
Flicker (2):	Reasonably Rational (1459),	northsidegal (1866),
Reasonably Rational (1):	NicoRobin (473),
NicoRobin (1):	Malakittens (1191),
Malakittens (1):	Nancy Drew Shogunate (1651),
Not voting (1):	Flicker (1865),

(expired on 2018-10-16 02:00:00) remain.

In post 1879, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:I dislike your reads on both Skygazer

what do you dislike / disagree with exactly?

but especially Flicker and it seems your sr us for our hard Flicker defense.

can you quote what i said that gave you this idea?

In post 1880, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:NSG , why are you still scumreading this slot?

i've made my reasoning pretty clear. is there something about the post you quoted that shows that i shouldn't be?

In post 1895, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:

In post 1828, northsidegal wrote:oops, meant to do this in one of my earlier posts. just bookmarking this quote, quite mysteriously.

Spoiler:

In post 1677, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:

In post 1505, Elsa Jay wrote:If you beleive it Tor, we'd like to confirm it's true. Your vote now lets her prove herself as Priest with the non Self-Hammer.

Vote her to confirm her. Any unvotes on her is scum who dont want her to prove her role.

Seriously, who makes up priest? I hadn’t even heard of that role before her claim?

Not opposed but doubt she’s lying about that.

~N

NSG, you clearly misunderstood my post. What I was “not opposed” to was having Flicker PROVE her claim. I was however adamantly opposed to lynching her. I agreed with Tora and others that doing so was more likely than not, was a waste of time, she I was and am still convinced she’s probably town here.

okay, stop.

how can you say that i "misunderstood" your post

In post 1840, Chara wrote:i'm so tired.
BuJaber keeps feeling town to me in his posts. it's his stances i haven't liked.

That's literally describing a town read.

In post 1899, McMenno wrote:Okay, what's the tpwhatever case? Lurkscum?

To crank it down to it's most basic - yes, it's a lurk scum case.
You could also just go read his entire ISO (which should take about 5 minutes tops) and have a very solid grasp of the issues with the slot.

In post 1894, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:

In post 1884, TPFKAP wrote:I COACH MY DAUGHTERS SOCCER TEAM AND IVE NEVER BEEN TO ONE GAME DRUNK YOU DONT KNOW HOW HARD THAT WOULD BE FOR SOMEONE ELSE

THIS IS A WITCH-HUNT

BEEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEER

You only say that as scum.

She says while still sitting on the incredibly meaningful Mala wagon...

I started to write more comments, but I realize I am being very snarky while I am also currently winning the wagon game (and thanks to TPFKAP for basically coming in and claiming scum).
So, really I should be contented, so i'm not going to post the snark so I can pretend I'm a better person than I apparently am.

The TPFKAP lynch will basically be a policy lynch considering his flip will be almost entirely informationless.

...and people gave me a hard time for saying we should lynch the third party player.

In post 1902, northsidegal wrote:

In post 1879, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:I dislike your reads on both Skygazer

what do you dislike / disagree with exactly?

but especially Flicker and it seems your sr us for our hard Flicker defense.

can you quote what i said that gave you this idea?

In post 1880, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:NSG , why are you still scumreading this slot?

i've made my reasoning pretty clear. is there something about the post you quoted that shows that i shouldn't be?

In post 1895, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:

In post 1828, northsidegal wrote:oops, meant to do this in one of my earlier posts. just bookmarking this quote, quite mysteriously.

Spoiler:

In post 1677, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:

In post 1505, Elsa Jay wrote:If you beleive it Tor, we'd like to confirm it's true. Your vote now lets her prove herself as Priest with the non Self-Hammer.

Vote her to confirm her. Any unvotes on her is scum who dont want her to prove her role.

Seriously, who makes up priest? I hadn’t even heard of that role before her claim?

Not opposed but doubt she’s lying about that.

~N

NSG, you clearly misunderstood my post. What I was “not opposed” to was having Flicker PROVE her claim. I was however adamantly opposed to lynching her. I agreed with Tora and others that doing so was more likely than not, was a waste of time, she I was and am still convinced she’s probably town here.

okay, stop.

how can you

posssibly,

possibly

say that i "misunderstood" your post

when i didn't even say anything about it?

I’m assuming based on me both defending Flicker slot and then saying I wasn’t opposed to her wagon. I wanted to clarify exactly what I meant by that, because without taking into account the whole proving of her claim thing, it looks like I was contradicting myself when I wasn’t. So, if my assumption was in error and you did actually understand what I meant, then that’s my mistake.

In post 1897, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1896, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:

In post 1893, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hell no
I want this dead 10000x faster than before just for how annoying this is

Are you convinced she’s scum though? I don’t want a policy lynch.

Yes
I said this when I voted I’m pretty sure

In post 1904, Thor665 wrote:

In post 1894, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:

In post 1884, TPFKAP wrote:I COACH MY DAUGHTERS SOCCER TEAM AND IVE NEVER BEEN TO ONE GAME DRUNK YOU DONT KNOW HOW HARD THAT WOULD BE FOR SOMEONE ELSE

THIS IS A WITCH-HUNT

BEEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEER

You only say that as scum.

She says while still sitting on the incredibly meaningful Mala wagon...

I was just waiting for Gamma to clarify. I think these recent series of posts from TPFKAF seems scummy to me as well.

UNVOTE:

VOTE: TPFKAP

I'm also very confused about the recent string of Porkens postings. wtf

Porkens, care to explain anything? some thought to share? Actually relevant information?

In post 1898, BuJaber wrote:

In post 1890, TPFKAP wrote:Vote bujabber, keep the advantage while we have it and press. Just look at his record, he is literally I thing about 90% WRONG on the issues that matter most to the town.

In post 1891, TPFKAP wrote:Show me his anti scum moves ste. He isn’t always anti town but he is never ever anti scum

You defend yourself by lying about me?

Not a good way to look townie.

You are the liar.


Gamma emerald thinks I’m annoying. Be careful everyone this is what happens if you annoy him

In post 1909, Chickadee wrote:I'm also very confused about the recent string of Porkens postings. wtf

Porkens, care to explain anything? some thought to share? Actually relevant information?

It’s all completely relevant that’s why I have so much support

In post 1906, Toogeloo wrote:The TPFKAP lynch will basically be a policy lynch considering his flip will be almost entirely informationless.

...and people gave me a hard time for saying we should lynch the third party player.

Yes, the reason you’ve been getting a hard time is because unlike TPFKAP, EJ is actually doing something useful. You’ve essentially got a myopic tunnel blindness when it comes to that slot. It’s only D1, what good does it do us to lynch the hard claimed neutral doc, who is actually trying to help town?

I wouldn’t vote TPFKAP, if I really thought she was just a policy lynch. I have only seen her use that “witchhunt” comment when she’s scum. I’ve been in games where people tr Porkens and wanted to policy lynch her for being annoying and I objected to that. Her most recent posts makes me think, she likely isn’t town here.

In post 1906, Toogeloo wrote:The TPFKAP lynch will basically be a policy lynch considering his flip will be almost entirely informationless.

...and people gave me a hard time for saying we should lynch the third party player.

We'll never have info from his posting.
We still have the info from his flip and the wagon and counterwagon (which is, frankly, most of the info I ever use for a lynch anyway)

I also didn't give you a hard time for the 3rd party push, I just didn't agree with it - which is also info on us and everyone else involved.

In post 1906, Toogeloo wrote:The TPFKAP lynch will basically be a policy lynch considering his flip will be almost entirely informationless.

...and people gave me a hard time for saying we should lynch the third party player.

Too be fair, I'm lovable and becoming the Town Mascot. The same cant be said for TPF.

Also your getting 3 people in a row responding to this one comment. That's an achievement.

Nah, we just need to ask if TPFKAP is Porkens again.

VOTE: TPFKAP
l-1.

In post 1906, Toogeloo wrote:The TPFKAP lynch will basically be a policy lynch considering his flip will be almost entirely informationless.

...and people gave me a hard time for saying we should lynch the third party player.

I don't see how it'd a bad thing to lynch scummy slots who are inactive over scummy slots who post content. When I quit mafia the meta in large themes was active town lynching eachother and scum just coasting so I fail to see why this is a bad thing

it's not like scum is going to kill them. unless you think the contentless slot is town, why not?
also the posts that are there are pretty scum. and honestly Thor is right about me on BuJaber, i can't help but TR it. another day we could revisit that.

and it's only informationless if TPFKAP is town.

consider this intent to hammer, i suppose.

cool. get the accused to claim and let's get rolling.

Why bother...

UNVOTE:
VOTE: TPFKAP

Well there goes day 1.

Remember I'm ascetic, so if anyone says they visited me for any other reason then to put a bullet in my skull, they are a liar.

I mean ... that spew of crap could be give up posting I suppose. That's some consolation.

There is a VERY strong reason to believe that NicoRobin is scum in this game. Like bordering on logical certainty reasoning. Just trying to get this in before threadlock.

~D

I dont know if a vigilante can shoot this night yet, but I assure you, you have easy pickings that arent me. Listen too Drixx, he's smart.

Inb4 I'm fucked because TPF is a vengeful.